Because Bitcoin is not only software, you dingus. The 1 MB block size cap is implemented in the software, but the coopting grows far beyond that into the social realm, into the networks of developers and businesses that control not only the code but also their branch of the project.
The code is open source and anyone can change it.
No, they cannot. You have no idea how things work if you believe that. You must submit proposed changes; Bitcoin Core and Blockstream get to decide if they go in.
There's no such thing as "The original vision of Satoshi Nakamoto" or a bitcoin that "is closest to the original".
Bullshit. Read the whitepaper and Satoshi's comments on bitcointalk. Calling BTC "Bitcoin" is like calling the Pythaogrean theorem "a+b=c" and then astoundingly you have the audacity to say shit like "there is no original meaning of Pythaogrean theorem." Get fucking real kid. Bitcoin is a socioeconomic design, a novel invention, defined by the white paper. BTC is not Bitcoin and stopped being so a long time ago.
Not "taking over," long ago took over.
Because Bitcoin is not only software, you dingus. The 1 MB block size cap is implemented in the software, but the coopting grows far beyond that into the social realm, into the networks of developers and businesses that control not only the code but also their branch of the project.
No, they cannot. You have no idea how things work if you believe that. You must submit proposed changes; Bitcoin Core and Blockstream get to decide if they go in.
Bullshit. Read the whitepaper and Satoshi's comments on bitcointalk. Calling BTC "Bitcoin" is like calling the Pythaogrean theorem "a+b=c" and then astoundingly you have the audacity to say shit like "there is no original meaning of Pythaogrean theorem." Get fucking real kid. Bitcoin is a socioeconomic design, a novel invention, defined by the white paper. BTC is not Bitcoin and stopped being so a long time ago.
You're nuts. Bye