36
Comments (5)
sorted by:
2
ramennov 2 points ago +2 / -0

It might drag it out, but wouldn't a decision against one claim just be used as precedent for a decision against another?

1
ClimbsAndCuts 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. Small claims decisions generally have no precedential effect. (In most of Indiana, none at all). I doubt even that non-mutual defensive collateral estoppel (based on a single court in a single state’s judgment) would be effective.

1
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

not in small claims court!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.nycourts.gov/courts/nyc/smallclaims/startingcase.shtml

for $20, we can literally swarm the fuck out of their lawyers without the ability to dismiss!