SNOPES: Did Convicted Terrorist Susan Rosenberg Sit on the Board of a BLM Funding Body? Weelll, that depends if your definition of terrorist includes smuggling guns and hundreds of pounds of explosives for various radical groups to utilize, some which were used to Bomb the Capitol Building. So.....
(media.patriots.win)
☭ Far-Left Media ☭
“It’s a matter of subjective determination”
Hmmnnn - if only that idea got applied to political dialogue and critical race theory.
FUCK THESE MARXISTS
Running guns, bombing government buildings = "Depends on how you define terrorism"
Selfies in the Capitol = "Worst Domestic Terror Threat in History!"
So I guess the stuff at the Capitol just depends on subjective determination too
It depends on the definition of "is"...
THIS RAISED MY BLOOD PRESSURE AND MADE ME YELL AT MY HUSBAND. He yelled back. We were yelling in agreement.
Oh yes, the guy that sat at Nancy Pelosi's desk = Domestic Terrorist
Susan Rosenberg, CONVICTED for being an active member of a group that BOMBED US GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS and was in possession of hundreds of pounds of explosives = Can we really call that 'domestic terrorism'?
YES. YOU CAN.
FUUUUUUUUUUUUU
I am so happy that you can yell in agreement. I'm a bit jealous to be honest.
Her son is the District Attorney of San Francisco. He has never tried a single case in court. Her husband is Bill Ayres. He developed Common Core. They're both terrorists who murdered cops.
Hey Snopes!
Fresh from the Oxford Dictionary.
ter·ror·ism
/ˈterəˌrizəm/
noun
noun: terrorism
the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
"the fight against terrorism"
Guess we can rate this one “True”
They don't mention "weapons and hundreds of pounds of explosives" until the verrrryyyy bottom.
One Man's Terrorism is another They/Them's existence.
I just read this reply after I replied upthread. 😂
Well their definition of domestic terrorism includes right wing so of course she isn’t a terrorist but their definition.
Berg
Shutup, ya bigots!
Is this a real screenshot of something someone wrote on Snopes?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/blm-terrorist-rosenberg/
It depends on what the word "is" means.
Clinton Perfected LYING!
Is there a ‘single, universally-agreed definition’ of anything anymore? You could use this exact same retarded argument to rate anything as ‘Mixture’.
What a bunch of shit heads. Snopes is fucking laughable.
In other words, only the left is allowed to determine what a terrorist is or isn't.
Fuck. These. Commies.
They're right-- it's hard to define 'terrorism'. Say for example, personally, I consider SNOPES as an information terrorist.
She wasn't at the Capitol iNsUrReCtIoN. Nope, not a domestic terrorist...
Well, one man's terrorist and another man's freedom fighter... 🙄
This really means all acts of terrorism now are in question, pending further back peddling and excuses.
Terrorism has a specific legal definition as well which is NOT subjective and can be proven in court.
In this case the dishonest “fact checker” is trying to invoke postmodernism which is an epistemology that denies that objective truth exists at all. “Truth is subjective” is directly from Foucault.
Additionally Foucault says that people should make (false, because everything is subjective anyway) truth claims to assert power for social “justice”.
Fortunately our court system isn’t based on this, not YET anyway.....
Snopes? Are you fucking kidding me? They are NOT credible. If you believe Snopes, I have a bridge to sell you....
Now do people walking into congress....
We have one, “the unlawful use or threat of violence especially against the state or the public as a politically motivated means of attack or coercion.” Is providing support and munitions to literal terrorists not covered?
No definition?
It's right here, this is Criminal Justice 101 - junior college stuff. C'mon man!
Can you imagine the self-loathing that must result from having to write this tortured bullshit?
Rosenberg.... wasn't it the Rosenberg's that gave nuke technology to the soviets?!!!
... ... ...
LMAO...Snopes is a used up rag.
By their standards EVERYTHING is a mixture.
Why bother even giving them traffic by looking over there...
Know thy enemy.
They're not the enemy, they are a distraction.
The media is not the enemy...
Okie dokie then...
I agree the MSM is the enemy...
Snopes is a distraction...kinda like the 120K Porsche parked two spaces away from your min-van.
A distraction.
I disagree, Snopes acts as a Fact Checker for social media and MSM alike.
It's used daily by normies. A war has battles, while pointing out this one tiny corner of hypocrisy won't win the war, it will be a won battle, and 1000's of won battles will win us the war.