1181
Comments (81)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
randomusers239874 -1 points ago +1 / -2

No that's where you're wrong. Monopolies are the natural end to any market because monolith entities like that are the most efficient. Competition is less efficient from a profit perspective. That's exactly why anticompetition laws exist, and were created long before government intervention into the market. The train monopolies were due to the free market, not despite it.

0
EUssr 0 points ago +1 / -1

No that's where you're wrong. Except that I'm not and every example you tried to bring is an example against the point that you're trying to make.

Every single time you get a monopoly there are countless alternative solutions to the problem they are addressing. The only way a monopoly could stay is if it simultaneously maximizes the "profit" or "utility" of each individual. Which absolutely will never happen through a centralized monopoly.

Competition is less efficient from a profit perspective.

You're too narrowly focused to see the issue. Markets don't give a shit about the profit of a single conglomerate.

You make more profit by balancing the number of entities in a way that simultaneously optimizes their size and complexity as well as their individual profit.