2620
Comments (133)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
51
kompromatdotwin 51 points ago +53 / -2

Here's the diff where her brother, Jeffrey Psaki, was added:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jen_Psaki&type=revision&diff=1003465012&oldid=1003421001

it was just removed. remember wikipedia editors look like this.

here is the reason given:

we don't report non-notable relatives

.. except, the goddamn link provided for context contains Jeff Psaki for notability!

https://archive.vn/Z5eGo

18
Bogey 18 points ago +19 / -1

At some point wiki history will get memory holed. I've noticed for trans people the history is 'problematic' because it dead names them.

0
EvanGRogers 0 points ago +2 / -2

The Jeff part was removed because it was just added today

1
kompromatdotwin 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Jeff part was removed because it was just added today

  • first: that's not what it says. that's something you said. I quoted the literal reason it was removed.

  • second first: why does when it was added matter, if it's true and relevant?

0
EvanGRogers 0 points ago +1 / -1

Because people randomly accused them of being related yesterday.

Someone went in and added it without giving a source

Then it got removed because the Wikipedia people were noticing interest in the article. They do that frequently.

1
kompromatdotwin 1 point ago +1 / -0

people randomly accused them of being related

THEY ARE RELATED. BROTHER AND SISTER!

Someone went in and added it without giving a source

My link shows the diff of the text where it was added, and the person who added the text to the page also included a link proving the relative's notability.

Why are you spreading uncertainty and doubt here?