2620
Comments (133)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
kompromatdotwin 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Jeff part was removed because it was just added today

  • first: that's not what it says. that's something you said. I quoted the literal reason it was removed.

  • second first: why does when it was added matter, if it's true and relevant?

0
EvanGRogers 0 points ago +1 / -1

Because people randomly accused them of being related yesterday.

Someone went in and added it without giving a source

Then it got removed because the Wikipedia people were noticing interest in the article. They do that frequently.

1
kompromatdotwin 1 point ago +1 / -0

people randomly accused them of being related

THEY ARE RELATED. BROTHER AND SISTER!

Someone went in and added it without giving a source

My link shows the diff of the text where it was added, and the person who added the text to the page also included a link proving the relative's notability.

Why are you spreading uncertainty and doubt here?

1
EvanGRogers 1 point ago +1 / -0

YOU DON'T HAVE EVIDENCE THAT THEY'RE RELATED.

POST ANY NON-WIKIPEDIA SOURCE