1034
Comments (49)
sorted by:
29
Rudygarrido 29 points ago +29 / -0

Did Some say GAB-Trade ™️

😂😂😂

6
Khan 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes plz

22
BulletsForTeethORG 22 points ago +22 / -0

Blocking Robinhood just blew the doors off the FTC... They have to answer for that, its akin to wire fraud.

5
Jaqen 5 points ago +8 / -3

Except the RH terms of service allow them to do whatever the heck they want, and every user agreed to it.

Ho hum, diddly dum. Pay attention next time. Don't sign up for services when the terms are not in your favor.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
5
Jaqen 5 points ago +6 / -1

Maybe. You'd be outlawing the ability for the company to exist in the first place, since without the terms of service, the company has no business model.

However when the business model is exploitation of unwitting consumers, that is certainly a problem.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-3
Jaqen -3 points ago +1 / -4

All the consumer had to do was read the terms. It is not rocket surgery.

By clicking agree, they consented that they not only read the terms, but agree to them.

Buyer beware. Stop enabling stupid consumers.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Jaqen 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m helping educate those very people.

So when they are next in this situation, where a contract is shoved in their face, they actually engage their brain, instead of blindly signing away any agency they may have.

This is how we empower people. Not by coddling them and insulating them from reality.

Further, this pushes back on the contract writers. More smart shoppers means less draconian contracts. It makes room for companies that have higher regard for their customers.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Jaqen 1 point ago +1 / -0

My argument is not that these services are ethical. It is the opposite. They are parasitic trash heaps.

However, you should have figured that out the moment you read the contract. And then declined the service. Instead of clicking Agree.

Stop chasing the shiny new free services off cliffs like lemmings.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Jaqen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Make sure to tell your lawyer that contracts you failed to read don't actually apply.

Then report back.

15
hiddensfinger 15 points ago +15 / -0

Next step would be 100 million Trump supporters pulling out all their cash from banks themselves. Lol.

11
Jaqen 11 points ago +11 / -0

Now that is revolutionary.

If big sibling is watching this website, it is notions like this that are truly the incendiary ones.

The chaos this would cause can not be overstated. Full and absolute collapse.

It is probably an awful idea, but it is an idea alright.

4
Khan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Im at a credit union. F these mega banks

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
NavySTG 3 points ago +3 / -0

And moving your 401k money to a cash fund. It would tank the market.

2
you_HO [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can you imagine the fallout? That would be AWESOME!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
Pierre_Delectoes 7 points ago +8 / -1

You need government approval to offer stock trading. So, good luck with that. If they shut down a liberal-run app, imagine what they'll do to a conservative-run one.

4
Ben45 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just don't market it as a conservative run app. Run it like one. Words are meaningless anyway.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
4
Jaqen 4 points ago +5 / -1

Smells a lot like a bunch of people who blindly accepted a "free" service, skipped reading the terms of service they agreed to, and then got exactly what should have been expected, if they were only paying attention.

Gee, where have I heard this story before?

Hate to sound like a broken record, but we need to be smarter consumers. Under no circumstances should you follow the herd off the cliff in pursuit of the new shiny service. Do due diligence, read the fine print, do not shop there. Only support businesses and services that respect you. Run far, far away from services who's business model and legalese allows abuse.

They're not your friends and the service is not "free".

6
Pierre_Delectoes 6 points ago +6 / -0

Most every brokerage was blocking or slowing trades on GME today, even the paid ones.

3
Johnfox13 3 points ago +3 / -0

Though RH was the only to sell trades or cancel already queued ones

1
Jaqen 1 point ago +2 / -1

System is rigged for sure. My point is for consumers to get a whole lot smarter when selecting who to crawl into bed with.

4
the-new-style 4 points ago +4 / -0

The irony is that Robinhood is only "free" in the same way Facebook is.

The trades are relayed to Citadel (!) in real time and they can front run them.

4
cjcivicx 4 points ago +5 / -1

Dogecoin: "TO THE MOOOOOOOOOOOOON!"

3
LibertarianXian 3 points ago +3 / -0

1DOG = 1DOG

3
Varangian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Citadel owns Robinhood. It’s a data mine.

2
ObamakilledJoan 2 points ago +2 / -0

At this point, I hope nobody is using Robinhood.

2
Fullidat1 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s temporary. Everyone has a price. Eventually it will end up where Robin Hood did: selling trader info to hedge funds.

2
AmericanJawa 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm hearing Tradezero stated loud and clear they're not going along with the blocking of stock purchases?

2
JigglesV 2 points ago +2 / -0

Difficult bc free trading cant exist. The broker needs to make money to exist, they sell order flow or charge commission.

I know what you mean and i feel your passion

This week is magnificent

2
mintscape 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem is with a free app, it has to sell order flow and the people buying that order flow are the exact same corrupt bastards you don't want anywhere near your app.

1
EvanGRogers 1 point ago +2 / -1

Probably owned by another corrupt company

1
Darkheartisland 1 point ago +1 / -0

Finra protects their own

1
Alphahorizon 1 point ago +1 / -0

The genie of Freedom will be global. None of these insecure tyrants CANNOT STOP IS.

1
OPsMom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Crypto an DeFi FTW!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
fuckthealphabetsoup 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Just build your own... "

Gladly.