1034
Comments (49)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
22
BulletsForTeethORG 22 points ago +22 / -0

Blocking Robinhood just blew the doors off the FTC... They have to answer for that, its akin to wire fraud.

5
Jaqen 5 points ago +8 / -3

Except the RH terms of service allow them to do whatever the heck they want, and every user agreed to it.

Ho hum, diddly dum. Pay attention next time. Don't sign up for services when the terms are not in your favor.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
5
Jaqen 5 points ago +6 / -1

Maybe. You'd be outlawing the ability for the company to exist in the first place, since without the terms of service, the company has no business model.

However when the business model is exploitation of unwitting consumers, that is certainly a problem.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-3
Jaqen -3 points ago +1 / -4

All the consumer had to do was read the terms. It is not rocket surgery.

By clicking agree, they consented that they not only read the terms, but agree to them.

Buyer beware. Stop enabling stupid consumers.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0