Wow, a large amount of ambiguous rules are inconsistently enforced and structured so that anyone can be ‘guilty’ at anytime for nearly anything. I’m shocked. I know what we need: more rules!
A generic strike is one thing, but categorizing someone as engaging in ‘sexual exploitation’ is far different. That could mean a million different things from trivial (like using skank) to criminal...that’s some Orwellian shit. BTW: never saw 90 day fiancé, but from what I’ve seen in clips, but it seems being a skank is required for casting.
I was just shocked that calling someone a skank in a group dedicated to being savage would be censored. It was coming directly from Facebook and not the moderators. I saw other people complaining about it too.
I haven't seen anywhere what was posted in there that was so offensive to be banned?
Yes, typically the women on that show definitely fit that label.
Wow, a large amount of ambiguous rules are inconsistently enforced and structured so that anyone can be ‘guilty’ at anytime for nearly anything. I’m shocked. I know what we need: more rules!
I got a strike this month for calling a 90 Day Fiance cast member a "skank" in a group that is called Savage.
Never had any issues in 13 years until January 2021.
A generic strike is one thing, but categorizing someone as engaging in ‘sexual exploitation’ is far different. That could mean a million different things from trivial (like using skank) to criminal...that’s some Orwellian shit. BTW: never saw 90 day fiancé, but from what I’ve seen in clips, but it seems being a skank is required for casting.
I was just shocked that calling someone a skank in a group dedicated to being savage would be censored. It was coming directly from Facebook and not the moderators. I saw other people complaining about it too.
I haven't seen anywhere what was posted in there that was so offensive to be banned?
Yes, typically the women on that show definitely fit that label.