2854
Comments (74)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
GlobalPatriotism 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah. I was there from early on and saw it evolve and change over time. In many ways it was probably the first digital communist takeover that kind of rolled out just like the Russian Revolution with the various incremental ratcheting and instigation and subversive agitation and false flag stuff all in a deliberate strategy to push in a certain direction.

What strikes me is that this is not an accident. I know that many are starting to realize that now, but I saw it unfold man years ago. My senses were already piqued back years ago when I saw Zuckerberg state that he wanted Facebook to replace the internet, which likely meant nothing to most people back then who were largely still ridiculing me for proposing that the internet could be taken over just like it has been. And it also struck me as odd when someone, maybe Mark Cuban, maybe even Elon Musk said, after I think a G6 meeting, I think in Canada/Toronto several years ago, that "the socialists/communists are coming", well before all this stuff started really gripping.

I unfortunately either did not retain either of those things or maybe just did not file them away properly, but what I would recommend to any youngster today is to not only get organized and autistic and obsessive about information, but to retain every little thing that seems even slightly odd or out of place to your gut/senses. If you have the gut and senses that allow you to see and sense what is going on well before they happen, you will also be saving materials that will only validate those gut feelings later on when things become apparent.

And when i say retain, I mean download the information/video locally, or at least on the cloud somewhere and also create backups.

To get back on the point. It is not that Reddit has lost its mind, it is doing the things it is doing out of very "sane" or deliberate reasons and they are going about it very intentionally. The censorship has nothing to do with all the claimed self-righteous altruistic intentions that the useful fool "moderators" espouse, It is all about an agenda to manipulate and control and essentially socially engineer with the result being genocide and an ethnic cleansing of all "white spaces", be it your neighborhood or native European countries.

2
Vermin 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is amazing that people do not follow their instincts when they sense something is off.
Back in college years ago I had a very interesting advisor that taught classes from time to time for CJC which was my major. One night he wanted to talk about Facebook. It had not been around very long. He got us started a little bit in the discussion.
He was waiting for something specific to get brought up.
Finally someone hit on censorship which was what he was waiting on.
Class kind of was skeptical, first amendment would stop that from happening was used as a counter point.
He mentioned it becoming too powerful / influential along with the censorship.
I might have been the only one of the 14 or so students that decided by the end of class not to ever join.
I just did not like that feeling I had.
But I still believe a lot of these censorship people have lost their minds.
People with power make stupid decisions on occasion.
They have too much power & are taking enjoyment from taking away a person's right to speak their piece.
They are shutting them up & no one is stopping them.
Not our supposed representatives in congress. No one.
Not sure where the solution is when we can not even vote them out.

2
GlobalPatriotism 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you are old enough, you may remember how about 2009 or so, there was this odd push of twitter into all corners of many if not all industries. You even had news anchors asking themselves befuddled, on air, why they are being made to push this nonsense twitter thing, and all the sudden all the companies were pushing for the use of twitter to reach out to customers, etc. That was both a long game, but it was also a means to centralize the conversation onto narrow channels that the government was actively monitoring with the help of a whole army of contractors. The same with facebook.

I think that it will take a lot of different efforts that need to be identified and then organized around and acted upon with focus; something our side is DEFINITELY not good at for a couple different reasons. But a good start would be low hanging fruits that we could even get alt-tech companies to join together on, to force the government to use gab and bitchute and parler, etc. because they are currently outright discriminating by only being on a few companies' services. It may backfire in some way, but it could also lead to the government being barred from using any social media if it does not use all social media, or it could force competition to even a small degree if all social media companies have to be on level playing field and can't be reprioritized.

I even think there could be a class action lawsuit by the Gabs and bitchute if the government does not publish to their sites or interact with citizens the same way as on the big sites. Wouldn't it be create to force Biden to have to publish to Gab and bitchute, etc the same way they publish to Twitter and Facebook ???

That's a very low hanging fruit.

2
Vermin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do remember some of the push of using Twitter. People were kind of like "Whats a Twitter & why only 140 characters?" (Looks like there are more characters usable now, or it did the last time I went over to see a CatTurd tweet a couple months ago.) Kind of fun in a way to have never had a social media account. I like being off the grid somewhat so to speak for those companies.
When you were talking about biden having to use social media, one of the best laughs I have had in awhile was the video from Florida from last summer where it was just a complete comedy of errors with how far behind his social media team was in technology.
I bet he would be a mess on other platforms.
I like your idea though of a class action lawsuit by the other social media companies.
It would be fun to watch them have to publish to the other sites.
Even better since rumble & gab are more free speech, it would be fun to also not let the official accounts be able to block citizens, even if the citizens are trolling.
I believe (this might be wrong), that at one point Mr. President Trump was not allowed to block people from his tweets.
This is a great idea you have here, fren.

1
GlobalPatriotism 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, that's right. And then they immediately blocked comments on Biden YouTube videos. I'm not sure if anyone is taking it to court or not, but it needs to be. Not only that, but just alone YouTube censorship on Youtube is also a clear proof that the government is engaged in censorship by only publishing to youtube that censors.