Nothing perks my ears up like when a conspiracy theory with a level of plausibility at a crude level gets amped up to the absurd. For example, could someone have committed arson? So why make a conspiracy theory involving far-fetched variables? To make even the plausible aspects toxic to consider.
It seems that random fires would be more...random and not burned in a straight line. A straight line that also follows the exact path of the country's largest single construction project to date. I'm on the fence on this one.
Nothing perks my ears up like when a conspiracy theory with a level of plausibility at a crude level gets amped up to the absurd. For example, could someone have committed arson? So why make a conspiracy theory involving far-fetched variables? To make even the plausible aspects toxic to consider.
I just dont see a bunch of teenager hippies with gas cans being that accurate....
Those fires are hundreds of miles wide, I think. Not an amazing level of accuracy required.
It seems that random fires would be more...random and not burned in a straight line. A straight line that also follows the exact path of the country's largest single construction project to date. I'm on the fence on this one.