150
posted ago by KuzoKevin ago by KuzoKevin +150 / -0

"Within eight months after the change in the law took effect, Viking Yachts, the largest U.S. yacht manufacturer, laid off 1,140 of its 1,400 employees and closed one of its two manufacturing plants. Before it was all over, Viking Yachts was down to 68 employees. In the first year, one-third of U.S. yacht-building companies stopped production, and according to a report by the congressional Joint Economic Committee, the industry lost 7,600 jobs.

When it was over, 25,000 workers had lost their jobs building yachts, and 75,000 more jobs were lost in companies that supplied yacht parts and material. Ocean Yachts trimmed its workforce from 350 to 50. Egg Harbor Yachts went from 200 employees to five and later filed for bankruptcy. The U.S., which had been a net exporter of yachts, became a net importer as U.S. companies closed. Jobs shifted to companies in Europe and the Bahamas. The U.S. Treasury collected zero revenue from the sales driven overseas.

Back then, Congress told us that the luxury tax on boats, aircraft and jewelry would raise $31 million in revenue a year. Instead, the tax destroyed 330 jobs in jewelry manufacturing and 1,470 in the aircraft industry, in addition to the thousands destroyed in the yacht industry.

Those job losses cost the government a total of $24.2 million in unemployment benefits and lost income tax revenues. The net effect of the luxury tax was a loss of $7.6 million in fiscal 1991, which means Congress' projection was off by $38.6 million. The Joint Economic Committee concluded that the value of jobs lost in just the first six months of the luxury tax was $159.6 million.

Congress repealed the luxury tax in 1993 after realizing it was a job killer and raised little net revenue."

Comments (9)
sorted by:
7
KuzoKevin [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Disclaimer - I am far from wealthy, but I know more than a few people who make good livings working directly for wealthy individuals.

It costs about $2 million per year to run and maintain a $10 million yacht. Most of that expense is payroll for crew and contractor maintenance.

6
literallyhitler 6 points ago +6 / -0

absurd to try to tax more when these ppl are already paying 100k, 200k in sales tax

2
ObamasLooseButthole 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what I always tell people. Let's say we all get 15%-20% tax rate. A billionaires 15%-20% is a whole hell of lot different than my 15%-20%

3
randomopinion 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or ,if these companies leave ,just impose a 70% tariff on their products sold in the US, Trump style. You will see they will come back again really fast.

3
winslow1132 3 points ago +3 / -0

Leftists seem not to understand cause and effect. It's that basic. They always assume that they can magically receive a certain share of last year's private revenue if they just tax it at that rate. The world doesn't work like that on any level. Not in taxation, not in farming yields, not in production of a mine, etc. These people are absolutely ignorant, stupid, and supremely arrogant at the same time.

2
tiredofwinning2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

they just didn’t do it right.

2
FightingTeuton 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great comment!

1
johnbillaby 1 point ago +1 / -0

30 years is way too long ago for retarded people to have any sort of memory of it. They can generally remember things from like 3 weeks ago or less.