2770
Comments (70)
sorted by:
96
current_horror 96 points ago +98 / -2

A billion dollars will keep you out of any jail, but no amount of money can bring you back to life.

56
deleted 56 points ago +57 / -1
36
Trump2024 36 points ago +36 / -0

Iceland was able to jail the snakes and throw their banking system upside down.

39
deleted 39 points ago +40 / -1
18
Trump2024 18 points ago +18 / -0

Sadly accurate

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
16
CucksForTheDonald 16 points ago +16 / -0

You can do that when they don't also control the politicians, the courts and the Federal police.

Also: Iceland has population 360,000. There's more transparency in a smaller population like that, because everyone is connected to each other through a single acquaintance. If something bad is going on, then you know someone with direct knowledge of it.

7
BigAmericanParty 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah its a little easier when your nation is the size of Cleveland.

7
VinnyMAGA 7 points ago +8 / -1

Now replace 'banks' with;

Politicians

Swamp creatures

Stock brokers

FBI

CIA

NSA

Judges

Supreme Court Justices

2
Aambrick 2 points ago +2 / -0

With all of that let's just say they are the real life illuminati, yes?

1
V2021 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, no shit. They make the illuminati look like amateurs.

0
Aambrick 0 points ago +0 / -0

I would have to disagree. The Illuminati would still ensure they would be hidden, and not pronounce themselves to the world in such a fashion. They would still be using people like these for the saps they are(but by no means are they idiots, they are disposable when their use is out). These people are more in line with Wanna be Illuminati types that don't follow the first rule(remain hidden even in victory).

They do make criminals look like amateurs though, especially, the psychopaths/sociopaths.

2
THELEADERSOFMEN 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hans Herman Hoppe has entered the chat

21
NotAPuma 21 points ago +24 / -3

Definitely not calling for violence.

17
deleted 17 points ago +18 / -1
2
NotAPuma 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree, Chairman.

1
V2021 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Peaceful protests at their homes just like BLM does.

1
NotAPuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

But of course.

9
Onemoretime11 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yup, RH committed suicide

2
jslenterprises 2 points ago +2 / -0

Didnt their IPO go public this morning as well?

2
Azrael1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or remit your ticket to hell.

43
deleted 43 points ago +44 / -1
21
Isolated_Patriot 21 points ago +22 / -1

So, working as intended then?

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
1
blackflame7000 1 point ago +1 / -0

We need to be smarter then. We keep falling victim to their cons

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
blackflame7000 0 points ago +1 / -1

Holding a highly volatile position on a stock indefinitely will eventually make you poor

33
tholins 33 points ago +33 / -0

I don’t want this to sound like I’m shilling. I’m not. But this is a really, really good example of my favorite internet maxim, if you aren’t the customer, you are the product.

This app, from what I understand, allows free trades for users, but in exchange, sells that data back to Wall Street for market trend analysis. Under normal circumstances, I suppose that’s a trade-off the user base is comfortable with, or at least accepts as okay in exchange for what they get.

But in an extraordinary situation like this, the flaws become apparent. The user base does not pay the bills and thus, the app is not going to act in their interest. The app will act on behalf of those who keep it alive, and here, those people used that leverage to try to stem their bleeding.

And thus is the whole thing is revealed as devious, underhanded, and potentially financially dangerous for the users. It’s one of these events that was unexpected, maybe unanticipated, but predictable. And because the user base at some level consented to the TOS, maybe not illegal. (Although some of the other shit RH has done may reach that level.)

Bottom line: you as a user are not in control. And when control matters, it really matters.

ETA. Also want to say that this doesn’t justify anything else RH might be up to or any other connections that might exist from them to others. There could definitely still be criminal activity here, and certainly they should get reamed in a class action lawsuit.

15
tom_machine 15 points ago +16 / -1

The trades aren’t free. Robin Hood routes them through a broker (often Citadel) who takes a fat spread and pays Robin Hood a small portion as commission. They are just saying that line of crap because they don’t take the money directly from users themselves. They use a third party entity to do it. It is a lie they tell to make you feel safe trading with them.

6
tholins 6 points ago +6 / -0

If they aren’t charging users directly, it all washes out to the same thing.

3
Tellsyouhow 3 points ago +3 / -0

And Bidens press secretarys brother is a key player in citadel and Wikipedia are erasing that connection

12
Rubicon_Don 12 points ago +12 / -0

Them taking money from big firms is whatever, I don't have a problem with that. What I have a problem with is halting the purchasing of a stock, and only limiting transactions to selling, so that the value drops and your investors can get out at a lesser hit.

That is market manipulation.

That is a federal fuck you in the ass felony.

4
tholins 4 points ago +5 / -1

Oh yeah, that part could definitely be criminal. I don’t know what the laws on that are. At the very least, it’s lawsuit fodder.

2
PepePinochet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Makes sense. well reasoned.

19
Ballind 19 points ago +19 / -0

They drew down on their lines of credit. They were existing relationships ahead of this

8
YouNeedVPN 8 points ago +8 / -0

You mean there's nothing fishy about the group that is shorting the stock having a prexisting relationship with RobinHood?

11
Ballind 11 points ago +11 / -0

Robinhoods actions are outright illegal when they blocked trades. That's independent of this.

They would have to have received something to call it a bribe. They already had the right to draw down.

6
YouNeedVPN 6 points ago +7 / -1

Citadel convincing robinhood to do something very illegal is definitely very illegal.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
5
BigSteve 5 points ago +9 / -4

Link to an article on CNN? Im sorry xir, but your ass is deported

3
PepePinochet 3 points ago +4 / -1

Deport at your own peril

SENDING FALSE REPORTS CAN GET YOU BANNED.

1
YouNeedVPN 1 point ago +2 / -1

Better than fox.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
Kamalas_a_Bitch 8 points ago +8 / -0

Oh it’s 100% obvious RH colluded with certain hedge funds. About as obvious as Hank Aaron’s cause of death.

4
sleepingbeautyc 4 points ago +4 / -0

Which makes it that much sweeter. That we were able to stick it to wall street using a site that was designed to fleece us.

3
gtwhizz 3 points ago +3 / -0

In 1969 my economics teacher had us chart stocks. He said that large traders would go down and see what the small traders were doing and do the opposite. If you traded in lots of 25 or 50 stocks the big boys would clean you out. It was like walking into a high stakes poker game with $100 in your pocket.

1
highenergywinning 1 point ago +1 / -0

Meaning 25 or 50 shares ?

2
geckogreen 2 points ago +4 / -2

what is this cnn BS on my patriots.win?

5
CucksForTheDonald 5 points ago +5 / -0

It is OK to link to the opposition when they're openly exposing themselves.

4
LOLFuckReddit 4 points ago +4 / -0

We need to learn how to battle evil with our money=power. It’s a tool we need to learn.

2
invalid_data 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pull your money out of Robinhood now! Just pulled my money out, fuck them. If 1000s of us do this then they lose regardless.

2
4Christ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not quite sure you're understanding what is going on in this instance. Check out this zerohedge article for a full rundown. Agreed that they do frontrun and are evil though....

"If something is free... YOU are the product"

1
Counterforce1 1 point ago +2 / -1

“EVERYBODY LIVES SOMEWHERE”

1
Hades440 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm dumb about stock stuff, but if all the stocks were bought up, and now the short sellers need to buy them all back, but the people who have them can't buy or sell because Robinhood blocked that stock, how will the short sellers get the stocks they need?

1
ChimpZilla 1 point ago +1 / -0

they allowed the holders of these stocks to sell , but not buy.....this way it drives the price of the stock back down and in turn allows the short positions to save money...now buying back at lower stock pricing coming down instead of rising which it would have continued to do - absolute collusion !

1
gurnzb 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are blocking buyers on their app. But people can buy the stock being sold on robinhood as robinhood likely links to other exchanges.

1
quesadalejandro 1 point ago +1 / -0

"everybody lives somewhere"

l like OP very much!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
JosephRBiden 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look fat here’s the deal. The big guy got his ten percent now shut up and let me sniff your daughter. Come on man! You one horse pony.

1
PatriotGabriel 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alright, you may be right... But let's not start going to people's houses and doing crazy things. I think jail is perfectly good enough

1
Big_Al_42223 1 point ago +1 / -0

spoiler: this guy goes to prison

1
dadmda123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn’t it ironic how it’s a company called Robinhood stealing from the poor to give to the rich?

1
Lepreco-Inc 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s bigger. If they didn’t get capital they could be shut down by the exchanges. Makes it worse when people do margin buys/shorts.

But yea, they give price info to big traders, increased liquidity by small moron investors. Both things big guys like. If there are only two traders in a market then there is no one to screw other than maybe the company.

1
GiveMe1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep, until these criminals turn up dead BECAUSE OF their bullshit, it will continue

1
Gmama2 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was a story (NOT VERIFIED) that people involved in rigging the election were being paid via deposits to Robinhood accounts.

I recently had a situation where a person told me they "recently came into money" and showed me their Robinhood app with 100K in cash but it looked like they hadn't put it in anything. Super, super weird, and I don't know the person well enough to ask more. She was a young person in college, well educated.

1
blackflame7000 1 point ago +1 / -0

The issue is that Robinhood gives you cash to invest immediately before that money has actually cleared from the persons bank. So for 2 days, Robinhood is on the hook for that money. If a person transfers $1000 and loses it all and the transfer fails, Robinhood just lost $1000. In order to insure against this, they are required to put up collateral on high margin purchases. In extreme cases like GME this can suddenly demand billions of dollars in collateral that the company was not prepared for. I'm not sold this was malicious by Robinhood. It's bad for their business

1
Rhondevu85 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve been noticing this trend with “free” apps like Twitter, Robinhood, Facebook, etc. always a price to pay. I think I would pay for a YouTube or social media service. I’m signing up for Gab soon.

0
Based_psychologist 0 points ago +1 / -1

Right with you until the last sentence.