Yeah but they were able to reduce the acid rain, stop CFCs and slowed depletion. So those things are not great examples since they were resolved through change.
We stopped using CFC's in the United States and Europe, but Chyna and India still use them and at higher volumes than we ever did. So that change in the use of CFC's very likely did NOT reduce/slow acid rain or fix the ozone hole.
I was told acid rain would destroy us. And hairspray ...ozone hole. Now Bon Jovi stumps for Biden. Surreal .
Yeah but they were able to reduce the acid rain, stop CFCs and slowed depletion. So those things are not great examples since they were resolved through change.
Correlation does not imply causation.
We stopped using CFC's in the United States and Europe, but Chyna and India still use them and at higher volumes than we ever did. So that change in the use of CFC's very likely did NOT reduce/slow acid rain or fix the ozone hole.
That's just not true, CFC levels plummeted in the from the late 80s and onward.
India and China don't account for even a fraction of the peak in the 80s when the issue was discovered and banned.
They even noticed a spike a year or two ago and traced it down to the source.
China peaked in 1998 at 50 ODP Tonnes of CFCs, but almost zeroed out by 2008. the world wide peak was ~1000 ODP Tonnes in 1986.
https://ourworldindata.org/exports/ozone-depleting-substance-consumption_v1_850x600.svg
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/p6MBQJ2BbwhDLNFehiOb5QA9gGd3H8lyPtNFR5-2Ss68F_bGlmI0JYWxV7FUJjKA2mtEhUO85MpBQ1dj_FG7CzTfMoL-qP_0
The china spike from a rouge produce a few years ago: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02109-2