So that small bit was added only on the 29th? Are we sure it wasn’t just a troll who saw the last name connection and made an edit? I’m not doubting it’s true but seems odd it wasn’t there for very long in the first place.
If we had real reporters at the White House they would ask something like ‘Hey does your brother work for Citadel? Trying to clear up any conflicts of interest or rumors’, but we know that won’t happen. I think we should dig into this more before spreading fake news.
Wikipedia is fake trash news.. it's nothing but propaganda.. even the founder of Wikipedia came out and said that it was untrustworthy because all of the moderators for the site are just far left and purposely pushed this information.. the CEO is an open communist..
and that's what they do. It's all far left weighing moderators that push this information.. they have openly banned every single right-wing and neutral website and only allow left-wing websites like cnn..
they violate Wikipedia's own mission statement and they remove any information that reflects negatively on the Democrat party..
it's not enough to call them out. You have to do something about it. If we can't make Wikipedia be honest through regulation then we need to pressure search engines to stop displaying Wikipedia results at the top
we need to get duck duck Go to replace Wikipedia with info galactic. Info galactic is a much better site without any of the censorship..
Hahvahd. It's just a small club. I'm surprised there isn't more inbreeding going on within the elite crowd, given how small it is. I bet some of these people can't imagine how big and diverse the world actually is, given that they only seem to be exposed to a small number of people.
****Far-right politics, also referred to as the extreme right or right-wing extremism, are politics further on the right of the left–right political spectrum than the standard political right, particularly in terms of anti-communist, authoritarian, extremist nationalist and nativist ideologies and tendencies.[1]
Historically used to describe the experiences of fascism and Nazism, today far-right politics includes neo-fascism, neo-Nazism, the Third Position, the alt-right, white supremacism, white nationalism and other ideologies or organizations that feature aspects of ultranationalist, chauvinist, xenophobic, theocratic, racist, homophobic, transphobic, or reactionary views.[2]
What's funny is the countries that fit a good amount of those descriptions are all non-white.
Muslim countries. Asian countries (they are extremely nationalist).
It's both sides. Its anyone high up in the uniparty
Rick Scott was CEO of the medical company owned by the Frist family when it plead guilty to the largest fraud case in us history. They are the largest provite hospital company in the USA.
But when Rick Scott was running for Florida governor that info was edited out of Wikipedia over and over.
My wife's medical nerd friends would confirm that when they try to educate Wikipedia with scans from text books and they don't get approved. It's not an online source, yeah it's a $300 - $600 text book educating nurses and doctors to 8 year medical degrees. You tell me which is more credible.
The claim that Wikipedia is not a reliable source comes from Wikipedia, which is not a reliable source, so it's not reliable to say that Wikipedia is not reliable.
Certain pages have more rabid "protectors" than others. Wonder what subject? Anything even tangentially related to marijuana has been censored for years, only subject I see things get deleted off the talk page on when the people trying to control it don't like it.
Look at the pages for Pizzagate and Seth Rich. The wiki editors loudly proclaimed they are "debunked conspiracy theories" and locked the pages from further editing. Dirty fucking communist scum
The big thing is taking control of entries so anything other people post, even if it's objectively fixing a mistake, gets undone. And because the cybersquatter is a senior editor (somebody who sits on their computer 16 hours a day monitoring Wikipedia entries) they can do whatever they want inside their little kingdoms.
Progressives even do edit events where they get together and make random pages more politically correct, and obviously anything political gets rewritten by Correct The Record or whatever the DNC calls their internet misinformation team these days. It's not bad looking up physics or math type of articles, history is hit or miss, but anything remotely political is pure biased garbage.
One of the most compelling arguments that I've seen in repealing 230 is that it would open places like Wikipedia--that only exists as an information laundering smear machine for leftists--up to defamation suits for all the outright lies this cess poll hosts.
Teams of SJW editors will dogpile on a page of interest (like Pizzagate) and make sure nobody can touch it. Even though there is lots of honest investigative reporting on the topic, they claim it's a "debunked conspiracy theory." Best redpill for normies on Pizzagate, by CBS' Ben Swann: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqCbMs5HzDo&list=LLSOrtA0leGHG5JfkHNq8SRQ&index=326
Help me out Pede, because I thought that the problem isn't 230, but is the abuse of 230 by publications that aren't truly eligible to receive it's protection. I mean there are publications like Craigslist who are the ones that 230 was meant to protect. Am I wrong?
230 is meant to protect PLATFORMS from being sued. Platforms don't pick a side. They moderate hate speech as dictated by federal laws, but everything else is hands off. They just host the content. They don't interfere with it.
PUBLICATIONS don't qualify for 230 protection. So Twitter removing things about the election fraud is them inserting their own morality and opinions into the content and dictate what is allowed/disallowed by their own thoughts.
Gab is a PLATFORM
Wikipedia is a PUBLICATION because they censor unduly. The only time censorship is technically acceptable is to remove hate/violent speech (which I don't agree with either. Words aren't violence. People CHOOSE to be violent. They should be held accountable for the ACTIONS, not their words).
I'd add to this that the courts have also misapplied section 230, interpreting it as a blanket immunity. 230 could be fine IF appropriately applied but I believe it's too late for that and it needs to be scrapped.
Orange woman bad allegedly has a brother working for the asshoes who have a hand in trying to restrict the comeuppance being played out on wall street before they got pissed they are looking at losing billions so flipped the "game board" and want to take their money back after losing in the gambling market.
I ran into the same thing, these bastards always use the excuse of consensus. One guy called Snoogasnoogans or something, kept calling every article I put out about the Maricopa Fraud and Ballot switching as from unreliable sources and right wing conspiracies. Even from the AP and AZ Central. So I mean, they are all full of shit. They are a hive mind of BS.
If I was a reporter I would preface each question with, "I understand if you have to circle back, but I want to get the question in front of everybody..."
and, "Circling back to the questions we didn't answer yesterday..."
Wiki is a joke - the editors have god complexes - i remember getting in a edit fight of an objective fact that was wrong in an article - but was cited. They basically do whatever they want since you can find a cite for pretty much anything.
Just create a page for him then link to that page from her page and then list him as her brother. His page will allow her to be listed as a relative because she is notable, and then her page will then link to his page as a notable relative. His notoriety being his relationship to her, to satisfy the requirement for him to be notable. See how this works?
...but did she really waste her time? Now she's the mouthpiece for our entire government and can take a five minute long press briefing and fill it with four minutes of "uh, um, circleback". She's literally a professional Time Waster now.
All you actually have to do is find an article that links the relationship, make a new subheading 'gamestop controversy' and go. while working at the whitehouse, x came under scrutiny for helping to advise regulation on a company her brother was working for, considered a case of conflict of interest. And link the article.
There is a group of discord trannies that go around every right-wing article and put dozens of 'conspiracy theorist' or 'right wing extremism' and 'debunked' crap and get away with it because they link one fucking article.
Obituary search indicates that he is not a sibling, first cousin, or uncle to Jen. Grandfather's obituary lists 2 sons, one of which has the same first name as Wikipedia shows for Jennifer's father; and 3 granddaughters, one of whom is Jennifer. No grandsons. There's also an obituary for the grandfather's other son, which shows no children, but lists the same 3 women as surviving nieces.
It's a very uncommon surname, so it's likely that the Citadel portfolio manager is related to Jen, but apparently not a very close relative.
Jen Psaki, WH press secretary's father (I think, also read brother) is a Portfolio Manager at the company that owns Robinhood.
I think. It's being scrubbed.
Wikipedia is full of shit. Check out the articles of the politicians that objected to the results of the 2020 election, then check out the articles of the ones that objected to the 2016 election. Ask yourself which articles made it a point to mention their objections in their article lead.
So that small bit was added only on the 29th? Are we sure it wasn’t just a troll who saw the last name connection and made an edit? I’m not doubting it’s true but seems odd it wasn’t there for very long in the first place. If we had real reporters at the White House they would ask something like ‘Hey does your brother work for Citadel? Trying to clear up any conflicts of interest or rumors’, but we know that won’t happen. I think we should dig into this more before spreading fake news.
“No hard questions”
“We’ll circle back on that one later”
Do the "journalists" ever go back to the questions she said to circle back on?
Oops, we’ve run out of time!
Wikipedia is fake trash news.. it's nothing but propaganda.. even the founder of Wikipedia came out and said that it was untrustworthy because all of the moderators for the site are just far left and purposely pushed this information.. the CEO is an open communist..
and that's what they do. It's all far left weighing moderators that push this information.. they have openly banned every single right-wing and neutral website and only allow left-wing websites like cnn..
they violate Wikipedia's own mission statement and they remove any information that reflects negatively on the Democrat party..
it's not enough to call them out. You have to do something about it. If we can't make Wikipedia be honest through regulation then we need to pressure search engines to stop displaying Wikipedia results at the top
we need to get duck duck Go to replace Wikipedia with info galactic. Info galactic is a much better site without any of the censorship..
While I agree with you, I didn’t say anything about Wikipedia just now.
Of course not. Circle back is code for "if you ask that question again you are out of here"
Circle jerk is more like it.
She tried to join a circle jerk in college but was so ugly, the guys got disgusted and limp so they left.
circle the bitch and her boss to fucking Gitmo
Flaccid questions only.
Flaccid, like a sweet ripe plantain, ready for the skillet
Lake Flaccid.
He nuked his LinkdIn
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=jeffrey+psaki&ia=web
I noticed that, too
That’s what happened with the crooked Dominion employees too.
Can confirm.
That's probably a smart move, whether he really is her brother or not.
We'll have to circle back with you on that one
Here how’s this
https://www.zoominfo.com/p/Jeffrey-Psaki/16675738
excellent, Zoominfo is uneditable
Hahvahd. It's just a small club. I'm surprised there isn't more inbreeding going on within the elite crowd, given how small it is. I bet some of these people can't imagine how big and diverse the world actually is, given that they only seem to be exposed to a small number of people.
I've heard lefties say they've never even MET a Trump supporter
Doesn't link Jeff to Jen
But a WH Reporter doing Real journalism could ask.... ok jk.
It's a common name! /s
Also at Goldman Sachs, Barclays, and Lehman in 2008.
https://www.zoominfo.com/p/Jeffrey-Psaki/16675738
Where does it say it is her brother?
It doesn't. I'm about 50/50 between this piece of news being an elaborate troll attempt or a Biden admin coverup.
Wikipedia has been overrun by communist editors and those in the organization with the last say always let things like this happen.
Don't EVER donate any money to Commiepedia.
Everyone right of Mao is a far-right extremist to them.
aLT-RiGhT!
****Far-right politics, also referred to as the extreme right or right-wing extremism, are politics further on the right of the left–right political spectrum than the standard political right, particularly in terms of anti-communist, authoritarian, extremist nationalist and nativist ideologies and tendencies.[1]
Historically used to describe the experiences of fascism and Nazism, today far-right politics includes neo-fascism, neo-Nazism, the Third Position, the alt-right, white supremacism, white nationalism and other ideologies or organizations that feature aspects of ultranationalist, chauvinist, xenophobic, theocratic, racist, homophobic, transphobic, or reactionary views.[2]
What's funny is the countries that fit a good amount of those descriptions are all non-white.
Muslim countries. Asian countries (they are extremely nationalist).
But white man bad
Use https://infogalactic.com/
It's both sides. Its anyone high up in the uniparty
Rick Scott was CEO of the medical company owned by the Frist family when it plead guilty to the largest fraud case in us history. They are the largest provite hospital company in the USA.
But when Rick Scott was running for Florida governor that info was edited out of Wikipedia over and over.
I hear Wikipedia is not a reliable source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source
My wife's medical nerd friends would confirm that when they try to educate Wikipedia with scans from text books and they don't get approved. It's not an online source, yeah it's a $300 - $600 text book educating nurses and doctors to 8 year medical degrees. You tell me which is more credible.
The claim that Wikipedia is not a reliable source comes from Wikipedia, which is not a reliable source, so it's not reliable to say that Wikipedia is not reliable.
Certain pages have more rabid "protectors" than others. Wonder what subject? Anything even tangentially related to marijuana has been censored for years, only subject I see things get deleted off the talk page on when the people trying to control it don't like it.
Look at the pages for Pizzagate and Seth Rich. The wiki editors loudly proclaimed they are "debunked conspiracy theories" and locked the pages from further editing. Dirty fucking communist scum
Even the Hunter Ukraine thing. ABC followed that story for 7 years only to now be "Rudy setup Hunter 3 years ago."
The big thing is taking control of entries so anything other people post, even if it's objectively fixing a mistake, gets undone. And because the cybersquatter is a senior editor (somebody who sits on their computer 16 hours a day monitoring Wikipedia entries) they can do whatever they want inside their little kingdoms.
Progressives even do edit events where they get together and make random pages more politically correct, and obviously anything political gets rewritten by Correct The Record or whatever the DNC calls their internet misinformation team these days. It's not bad looking up physics or math type of articles, history is hit or miss, but anything remotely political is pure biased garbage.
Gravity is free!
> We don't report non-notable relatives
oof
Your wikipedia listing lacks "standing"..
One of the most compelling arguments that I've seen in repealing 230 is that it would open places like Wikipedia--that only exists as an information laundering smear machine for leftists--up to defamation suits for all the outright lies this cess poll hosts.
Teams of SJW editors will dogpile on a page of interest (like Pizzagate) and make sure nobody can touch it. Even though there is lots of honest investigative reporting on the topic, they claim it's a "debunked conspiracy theory." Best redpill for normies on Pizzagate, by CBS' Ben Swann:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqCbMs5HzDo&list=LLSOrtA0leGHG5JfkHNq8SRQ&index=326
Help me out Pede, because I thought that the problem isn't 230, but is the abuse of 230 by publications that aren't truly eligible to receive it's protection. I mean there are publications like Craigslist who are the ones that 230 was meant to protect. Am I wrong?
No.
230 is meant to protect PLATFORMS from being sued. Platforms don't pick a side. They moderate hate speech as dictated by federal laws, but everything else is hands off. They just host the content. They don't interfere with it.
PUBLICATIONS don't qualify for 230 protection. So Twitter removing things about the election fraud is them inserting their own morality and opinions into the content and dictate what is allowed/disallowed by their own thoughts.
Gab is a PLATFORM Wikipedia is a PUBLICATION because they censor unduly. The only time censorship is technically acceptable is to remove hate/violent speech (which I don't agree with either. Words aren't violence. People CHOOSE to be violent. They should be held accountable for the ACTIONS, not their words).
I'd add to this that the courts have also misapplied section 230, interpreting it as a blanket immunity. 230 could be fine IF appropriately applied but I believe it's too late for that and it needs to be scrapped.
1984 in action!
Someone please catch me up
Orange woman bad allegedly has a brother working for the asshoes who have a hand in trying to restrict the comeuppance being played out on wall street before they got pissed they are looking at losing billions so flipped the "game board" and want to take their money back after losing in the gambling market.
Thank you
The stupid bitch with the lazy eye, stutter, and inability to not say 'um' or 'uh'.
That's the one.
Is Jen that cunt that wears the Soviet hammer and sickle?
Yes on both counts.
Yes
Yahoo article: https://archive.is/Z5eGo
Zoom Info: https://archive.is/pnqWe
No brakes, wiki wiki. Too late- we know about raggedy Ann and Andy
He disappeared from Linkedin as well.
Raggedy Ann has a brother, Raggedy Andy.
The memes write themselves.
I'm fucking sad that wikipedia became propaganda outlet
Every institution that is not explicitly right-wing always gets subverted by leftists.
I ran into the same thing, these bastards always use the excuse of consensus. One guy called Snoogasnoogans or something, kept calling every article I put out about the Maricopa Fraud and Ballot switching as from unreliable sources and right wing conspiracies. Even from the AP and AZ Central. So I mean, they are all full of shit. They are a hive mind of BS.
Haha, yes I was done with them (donating) when I noticed that one of their most common references was SPLC, are you kidding me??
Yeah, they are full of shit.
SPLC is a meaningless organization. They only have as much power as you give them.
Noticing things is illegal citizens, don't make me call the thought police
Over the target
I wonder if the corrupt media will ask that redheaded ding bat simple question regarding her family member only to have her circle back on that.
If I was a reporter I would preface each question with, "I understand if you have to circle back, but I want to get the question in front of everybody..."
and, "Circling back to the questions we didn't answer yesterday..."
There are no reporters left. The few that are left will certainly not be allowed in the White House.
Wiki is a joke - the editors have god complexes - i remember getting in a edit fight of an objective fact that was wrong in an article - but was cited. They basically do whatever they want since you can find a cite for pretty much anything.
Just create a page for him then link to that page from her page and then list him as her brother. His page will allow her to be listed as a relative because she is notable, and then her page will then link to his page as a notable relative. His notoriety being his relationship to her, to satisfy the requirement for him to be notable. See how this works?
Psaki graduated from Willam and Mary College in 2000 with a double major in English and sociology, according to the school’s website.
She was also on the school’s swim team and in the Chi Omega sorority.
English and sociology. Wow. She basically wasted her time
She was on the swim team. That's good.
Well if she did something productive she wouldn’t be in the Biden administration
...but did she really waste her time? Now she's the mouthpiece for our entire government and can take a five minute long press briefing and fill it with four minutes of "uh, um, circleback". She's literally a professional Time Waster now.
Wikipedia is built around the teachings of how the Ministry of Truth functioned.
These people are pathological liars.
Okay. How do we gain consensus? There's enough of us.
You have to go to the Talk page and have a conversation with a bunch of lefties who then cry to an administrator, getting you banned.
Roger. What was I thinking?
I have seen that it is her brother, husband, and father. So which is it??!! Makes me uneasy about the trustworthiness of all this.
Everything about a leftist is lies
All you have to do is put it back. Wiki is fake news anyway.
All you actually have to do is find an article that links the relationship, make a new subheading 'gamestop controversy' and go. while working at the whitehouse, x came under scrutiny for helping to advise regulation on a company her brother was working for, considered a case of conflict of interest. And link the article.
There is a group of discord trannies that go around every right-wing article and put dozens of 'conspiracy theorist' or 'right wing extremism' and 'debunked' crap and get away with it because they link one fucking article.
Screen shot everything. Use the lovely Waybackmachine too. :) https://www.zoominfo.com/p/Jeffrey-Psaki/16675738
Compare this horseshit to Kayleigh's entry:
((Wiki)) decided her fucking cousin was "notable" to include in an encyclopedia, but a Citadel insider connection isn't LOL.
GET FUCKED WIKIPEDIA FAGGOTS
Obituary search indicates that he is not a sibling, first cousin, or uncle to Jen. Grandfather's obituary lists 2 sons, one of which has the same first name as Wikipedia shows for Jennifer's father; and 3 granddaughters, one of whom is Jennifer. No grandsons. There's also an obituary for the grandfather's other son, which shows no children, but lists the same 3 women as surviving nieces.
It's a very uncommon surname, so it's likely that the Citadel portfolio manager is related to Jen, but apparently not a very close relative.
Sorry, I'm out of touch. What does this mean?
Jen Psaki, WH press secretary's father (I think, also read brother) is a Portfolio Manager at the company that owns Robinhood. I think. It's being scrubbed.
This needs to be blasted out somewhere for the normies to see.
Wasn't the Steel dossier mentioned in a Yahoo news article? Will they remove any mentions of it from Donald Trump's Wikipedia page?
No, that's notable and has "gained consensus". They'll move the goal posts to justify whatever they want.
Bidens guillotine off with the head & shoulders
What type of name is Psaki? Jew?
Sounds more like either Polish or... gasp Russian! Russian collusion in Biden's Regime!
Slavic for sure
Why is she so ugly and plain?
Does not appear to be interested in make up. Angry Lesbian?
She looks evil! Has those psycho eyes. Just like biden and everyone else on his team
I have been turning all media off and don't know much about her...
Does she wear any make up? It does not look like it.
Dunno man, inbred? Mild FAS or some other shit?
Or it was other name that was made to look European, if you know what I mean.
Common practice in Eastern bloc post WW2
How do we go from lovely Kayleigh to this creature. I'm gonna cry.
Greek?
Hahaha
It's Greek.
1984 editing
Biden’s presidency is even dirtier than we knew.
How many cups of coffee did she donate to wikipedia?
Honestly how do they still believe they're the good guys?
How do they not understand?
Wikipedia is full of shit. Check out the articles of the politicians that objected to the results of the 2020 election, then check out the articles of the ones that objected to the 2016 election. Ask yourself which articles made it a point to mention their objections in their article lead.
Here's a fun meme to share to make this easy on everyone
Is there ap viable alternative to wiki?
https://infogalactic.com/info/Main_Page
Thank you!
What is Jeff's actual relation to her? I've seen husband, father, and now brother.
WIKIPEDIA IS TRASH.
Gang members are always promoted.
That brother also worked for Goldman Sachs and Magnetar. Wow, what a slimeball. I mean f***ing Magnetar for godsakes.
Well his LinkedIn page says he works there.