Isn't the subject matter jurisdiction of executive orders supposed to only extend to the actual workings of the executive branch of the federal government?
For example, the 100 day mask mandate only applies to federal buildings and federal lands. It is (and has to be) that way to make the executive order legal. (But, even this may be extra-legal. Just saying).
Therefore, if an "executive order" strays from its legal limitations (e.g. an EO that required jail time for making fun of Biden or saying Merry Christmas), it's null and void right out of the gate.
Isn't the subject matter jurisdiction of executive orders supposed to only extend to the actual workings of the executive branch of the federal government?
For example, the 100 day mask mandate only applies to federal buildings and federal lands. It is (and has to be) that way to make the executive order legal. (But, even this may be extra-legal. Just saying).
Therefore, if an "executive order" strays from its legal limitations (e.g. an EO that required jail time for making fun of Biden or saying Merry Christmas), it's null and void right out of the gate.