1660
Comments (153)
sorted by:
159
FuckGovernment 159 points ago +174 / -15

Because too many people here are more interested in cartoons, memes, and jokes.

My serious posts go nowhere. But if I meme Joe Biden giving fellatio to Xi Jinping it skyrockets to the top and gets stickied.

93
Counterforce1 [S] 93 points ago +96 / -3

We all need to let go of the denial - there will be NO PEACEFUL RESOLUTION TO THIS FIGHT -

Unfuxking cuck yourselves!!!

THIS FIGHT IS COMING DOOR TO DOOR

53
deleted 53 points ago +54 / -1
13
aaafirefly123 13 points ago +16 / -3

We can’t organize, we get infiltrated and arrested by the FBI the moment we do.

10
Kspesard45 10 points ago +10 / -0

Sounds like an excuse. If FBI can infiltrate, then why can't we do the same to them? Or get big enough to make it hard to monitor?

4
zeporscheguy 4 points ago +6 / -2

Social media is designed to discourage violent discourse. You want to be the first one to memorialize promoting violent insurrection in social media posts? Good luck with the ensuing red flagging.

1
IroWide 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol Imagine a few thousand patriots busting down the doors of the FBI at 3am, setting off flash bangs and tying up agents in zip ties. Now THAT is a wet dream.

1
LessAndLessIronic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now THAT is a wet dream.

This idea is why they feel safe doing it to you.

25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
5
ProudlyConservative 5 points ago +5 / -0

Do you think it's possible that this will pass since the dems control both the house & the Senate?

1
befehlistbefehl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ask the people of VA about that.

4
6
GingerRyan 6 points ago +6 / -0

I live in Houston and she is the biggest disgrace to not only Houston, but Texas as well. She's a dumb bitch

1
Parhelion12 1 point ago +1 / -0

Soooooo.... seems like an easy problem to solve. If Texans can't deal with one rogue cunt, then fuck all your big talk.

1
cuntard 1 point ago +1 / -0

you seem to be holding on to the absurd notion that votes are counted honestly or even matter at all.

1
LessAndLessIronic 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think he's talking about voting. At least not the kind of voting you are thinking of.

I think he's talking about taking out the trash.

2
Forbidden_outcast 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fellowship with your neighbors and local community. Give a little, take a little. Don’t discount someone bc they aren’t as advanced as your own way of thinking, or are dumber than you think they should be

The internet is not, and will never be- the proper forum to plan anything

25
AllYouHaveIsYourself 25 points ago +26 / -1

Bingo.

One thing u/Anaconda was always right about.

23
LatinSocialDistanced 23 points ago +23 / -0

My most upvoted posts are also memes, not discussions, nor info.

11
lixa 11 points ago +11 / -0

I feel like we need a separate section for activism than for time wasting posts.

18
Kraznaya 18 points ago +21 / -3

Lets see where it goes.

There's been no action on this legislation since it was introduced on the 4th. We know they want to devastate 2A, but its important to remember that of all the many thousands of bills that Congress introduces only a very small percentage become law.

Its good to see what the grabbers are thinking, but until this advances there's no reason to focus on this fight while we have so many others raging around us.

32
fskfsk 32 points ago +32 / -0

What they do is draft an extreme law. Then they make a compromise version that has maybe 10%-20%. Repeat every few years and gradually they get all the restrictions they want.

23
Counterforce1 [S] 23 points ago +23 / -0

Even 5% of this is a declaration of war against 2A. Don’t wait until even standing there armed makes you a felon

14
lake-koshkonong 14 points ago +14 / -0

Correct. What part of "shall not be infringed" do they continue to not understand?

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +8 / -2
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
QSWO1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good use of sarcasm.

1
cuntard 1 point ago +1 / -0

the cunt that wrote it is a c0ngresscunt from Texas...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
15
Counterforce1 [S] 15 points ago +15 / -0

This fight is here

THIS IS THE READLINE

DONT WAIT TO BE A FELON TO FORM UP

8
geotus3000 8 points ago +8 / -0

They need to remove the filibuster first. That's their primary objective. Once that's done it'll be a flood of this legislation and far worse.

6
Counterforce1 [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

LETS NOT “SEE WHERE THIS GOES” WHEN WE ALREADY KNOW WHERE IT GOES. YOU KNEW THE ELECTION WAS RIGGED BEFORE NOV3rd and you “waited to see where things go” Fool me once....

2
Spez_Isacuck 2 points ago +4 / -2

But we’re all supposed to panic and light our hair on fire and denounce Pepe memes.

3
Beardedboom 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know exactly where you are coming from! :/

59
OGpsywar 59 points ago +60 / -1

It's important to know what these idiots are up to, .. but also -- they do this all the time. And both things need to be understood: The veteran's understanding that they do this all the time, as well as the newly-redpilled's Proper Alarm that they shouldn't be trying it.

👍

An amount of extra insight on where they are, with it, is that Sheila Jackson Lee couldn't have written this in her wildest dreams, .. and who ever did write it is so marginalized for sponsors that they had to go with Sheila Jackson Lee.

15
macrolinx 15 points ago +15 / -0

This is truth right here. WHO puts up a bill is almost as important as what's in it.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
Winning_Bigly 1 point ago +1 / -0

Members of Congress haven’t written a bill since the mid nineties. The writing is outsourced.

47
watchman4u 47 points ago +47 / -0

This is Completely Unconstitutional

45
deleted 45 points ago +45 / -0
9
watchman4u 9 points ago +9 / -0

Only when Means Everything to We the People will this Change.

6
grndmrshlgando 6 points ago +6 / -0

pelosi wipes her wrinkly ass with the constitution. this is a dictatorship in every way but the name. rip to the poor covidiots they send to attempt to disarm a defensive, pissed off population wary of rampant communism

2
cuntard 2 points ago +2 / -0

so is mail in voting, but here we are...

36
generated_name 36 points ago +36 / -0

Stuff like this isn't meant to pass. It's meant to prime people for the next bill with less restrictions; so they can say "See we're compromising with you. Compare this to the last one we wanted and you'll see we're giving up a lot here." If that one doesn't fly either, then they'll water it down even more and do it again.

The goal is only to get a few restrictions, then a few more later, then a few more after that until they get what they want.

26
Counterforce1 [S] 26 points ago +27 / -1

Which just happened for the last 30 years - this time is DIFFERENT.

They have gone all the way -

Rigging the election Shutting down the internet Covid lockdowns Market manipulation

They have ALL THREE BRANCHES NOW and they have their masks off.

This is not like before - ITS ENDGAME TIME

8
1A2A 8 points ago +8 / -0

That combined with allowing the Republicans to "fight" against the evil people on the "OTHER" side of the aisle. CUNTS!

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
27
AnthonyS 27 points ago +28 / -1

Boating accidents are real. I’m very sad.

19
Counterforce1 [S] 19 points ago +19 / -0

Oh - I see you haven’t read the bill yet my fren. You’ll be paying insurance and they have the loss stuff pretty covered - ya know that redline....

14
Fluffy_Indigo 14 points ago +14 / -0

Not to mention guns you have to hide, guns you'll be punished worse than the murderer for using to defend your self, are guns that don't mean anything.

All of these boating accident jokers still don't get it.

3
Dogpile1 3 points ago +3 / -0

$75,000 fine and 15 years in the joint.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
2
ikeepforgettingname 2 points ago +2 / -0

Harder to prove the gun sales to individuals prior to registrations. I sold all mine except these 3 muliti-caliber here, sorry.

2
Dogpile1 2 points ago +2 / -0

What’s the point in having them then?

2
Ballind 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not answering your question just making a statement about probability. It's much more likely that a gun will be used to restore the constitution in a revolution than it is that it will be used to defend yourself.

1
Dogpile1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve had to use mine twice to defend myself. Ahead of the curve I guess. But in general, given the amount of gun owners, you’re probably right.

5
Thomas1963-1967 5 points ago +5 / -0

I sold all of mine on Craigslist for cash officer. No, I don't have any receipts.

1
cuntard 1 point ago +1 / -0

no joke. i recently lost all of my firearms in a tragic boating accident.

22
PresidentPussyGraber 22 points ago +22 / -0

Sabika Sheikh bill... *facepalm

8
IncredibleMrE1 8 points ago +8 / -0

Sheila Jackson Lee is a deranged BLM lunatic. Also probably involved in human trafficking.

21
snebe 21 points ago +21 / -0

California laws for the nation... It's the duty of the people to not follow unjust laws. Real Friends, Real Wealth, Real Skills

20
Ayexern 20 points ago +21 / -1

I was under the assumption that the AR-15 isn't a military grade weapon. Also, the amount of limitations on pistols is beyond cringe. Love these people that make our legislation, absolutely no experience with firearms but want to impose restrictions. These people are insanely retarded, brain melting troglodytes.

But seriously this should be stickied. Democrats control all three branches, this could actually happen. Or when it's shit-canned in Congress, our good ol Potato signs an EO.

12
Red37 12 points ago +12 / -0

The $800 “fee” to purchase a firearm is cringe

6
CommunismIsForLosers 6 points ago +6 / -0

Which branch of the military uses AR-15s?

4
kt524 4 points ago +4 / -0

None, in fact the civilian ARs were made for the public and the military didn't want it without full auto so Colt made their own which became the m16.

5
grndmrshlgando 5 points ago +5 / -0

dont bother trying to play by any kind of rules with these psychopaths. they want your fucking guns and they want you fucking dead. nuff said

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
FuckRedditMAGAMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

They aren't; they're big and black, and thus terrifying to Leftists

2
Montanan 2 points ago +2 / -0

The author of this bill is also big and black and terrifies me.

16
Regeth 16 points ago +16 / -0

Gun confiscation has happened before. They did it during Katrina in 2005.. I remember when I was deployed down there and there where rumors of this happening, but didn't believe it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9qUxaTikuc

15
TexasPiper 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yep. But the military is totally on our side. Right guys? Guys?

There were armed standoffs with property/business owners who stayed to protect their shit from the looters, who were allowed to operate with impunity as always.

7
Beardedboom 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is making me wonder more about the troops being left until "April". Set this bill in motion or pass it right along with whatever evil FF they are planning.

6
Counterforce1 [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

This was such a demonstrative video i went and posted separately - HOLY FUCK

IF YOU THINK IT CANT OR WONT HAPPEN GO WATCH THIS VIDEO OF HOW IT HAPPENS

12
BugsleyKAG 12 points ago +12 / -0

Technically an expert - Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee incorrectly claimed that AR-15 rifles fire .50 caliber ammunition and that the weapons are “as heavy as 10 boxes that you might be moving.”

12
Thomas1963-1967 12 points ago +12 / -0

The odds of me doing that if it were to pass, are zero.

9
Ed_Ward 9 points ago +9 / -0

They consider a weapon with a bayonet attachment a military style weapon. Well crap, my water pistol with a plastic knife taped to it is in big trouble.

9
BugsleyKAG 9 points ago +9 / -0

Take it to the BUY-BACK, big profits await.

8
brightfish 8 points ago +8 / -0

There are a handful of perpetual (D) congressmen, including Shiela Jackson-Lee in this case, who regurgitate this same bill every Congress. Not to say that it won’t someday gain traction, but to date it never has.

Important safely tip: They’re always coming for your guns. Nothing really has changed here.

7
Counterforce1 [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

It would be a mistake to consider this bill in the environment of the past.

This bill is within the context of 26k troops already enabling a coup, mass lockdowns, Internet purges and complete market manipulation not to mention the Marxist cultural takeover being ordered across the entire govt. The CCP is unmasked and in full control on broad daylight. The Equity Marxists have seized control and silenced all dissent.

This will not be like before ...

1
SquidThrowFaux 1 point ago +1 / -0

BREAKING THIS IS HAPPENING NOW>>>updoots>>updoots>>>>

Latest Action: House - 01/04/2021 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary

cough Trump was still in the Whitehouse. You are right.

7
CommonSenseForYou 7 points ago +7 / -0

Ah yes, a Texan Democrat Representative is sponsoring it.

2
JohnSpartanSAPD 2 points ago +2 / -0

And no cosponsors, Referred to committee where it will die.

5
Counterforce1 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Because our majority in the.....

Why would this die in committee again? Who will block it? Cause it’s unpopular? Like lockdowns and masks are unpopular? Like shutting down schools is unpopular?

The Dems control ALL three branches of the govt.

Hold onto your butts...

7
TheCucksAreComing 7 points ago +7 / -0

Because unconstitutional laws aren't laws.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
7
Guildpro101 7 points ago +7 / -0

If they pass this bill, i think we move from the ballot box to rhe cartirage box. I dont need an ID to vote but if I want a semi auto AK i need to pay a 800 fee for a license, background check, registrations and a base licenses to just use my god given right...

Whats next, tax you to pray, license to offend? Fuck it, at this point, a poll tax is reasonable in comparison. Hell, male land owners should only get a vote then.

This bill is tyranny and who ever wrote and pushed this shit should be removed from office.

10
Thecryptoclub 10 points ago +10 / -0

With guns, there are tragedies, without guns, there would be genocides.

5
Guildpro101 5 points ago +5 / -0

Damn, you come up with that? Mind if I steal it?

6
Thecryptoclub 6 points ago +6 / -0

I heard something similar a while back - honestly, I give it away freely. Should be meme’d hard.

1
Cyer6 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't forget about your pysch exam.

2
Guildpro101 2 points ago +2 / -0

'Purity' exam. Can't have wrong think with guns.

6
rentfREEEE_since2016 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fuck me. This is so unconstitutional I can’t even. . . Not that that’s ever stopped them before

Also fun times, everybody gets to know exactly what guns you own. Or don’t. Great reference to those joggers who want to rape your wife and daughter when you brought a baseball bat to their unregistered firearm gunfight.

The Attorney General shall make the contents of the database accessible to all members of the public, all Federal, State, and local law enforcement authorities, all branches of the United States Armed Forces, and all State and local governments, as defined by the Bureau.

2
MrStep 2 points ago +2 / -0

Since money can be used to purchase guns, maybe they should also register all cash and assets and post how much is in each home in a public database. Solid plan, sounds totally legal.

6
Badradness 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is how the civil war begins

2
Counterforce1 [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

MINUTEMEN FORM UP!!

1
Montanan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately, I am ready for it.

6
IncredibleMrE1 6 points ago +6 / -0

JFC. Trying to mandate psych evals in order to purchase.

"Oh you like Trump? Mentally unfit to own a gun."

5
trumpmixtape 5 points ago +5 / -0

Because mods hate me and i spent hours reading it and writing an entire summary of the bill for you guys yesterday link

5
Counterforce1 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Dude your summary was the balls!!! That WAS you!!! All my comments and focus today came from your post. I’ve been working this all day in person too.

You’re fucking TOP KEK fren!!!

5
LRRP 5 points ago +5 / -0

You’re a conservative? No gun for you!

“ “(II) undergoes a psychological evaluation conducted in accordance with paragraph (2), and the evaluation does not indicate that the individual is psychologically unsuited to possess a firearm; and...”

5
Sgtt 5 points ago +5 / -0

Woooowww. What in the actual fuck

5
PocketPosse 5 points ago +5 / -0

Whatever you do, DO NOT REGISTER YOUR GUNS. After they pass registration laws, they will pass laws that will make owning a gun hard to afford. The left have learned not to outright ban things. They will financially boil you out of WANTING to own a gun.

5
grndmrshlgando 5 points ago +5 / -0

so at a bare minimum you're looking at 10s of millions of gun owners, who purchased guns for this exact reason in case of a tyrannical regime just like we have now. pigs are outnumbered badly just through sheer attrition

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
StartAgain 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's gonna look nasty in coming days

4
baby_puncher_2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

Publicly available psych eval? I see problems.

4
Turnin_the_frogs_gay 4 points ago +4 / -0

This should be stickied for visibility. These scum want us dead.

3
krofe2 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can see how disingenuous these leeches are by how they name these bills. They don't go out and eulogize all the people that day everyday in the inner cities due to illegal guns do they?

3
MagaHippie88 3 points ago +3 / -0

Where I store my boom boom sticks is none of your Damn concern..... ps hiss hiss... <3 MAGA2021

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
OXIE 3 points ago +3 / -0

Its not the only one.

Guns.com News Gun Culture And Here come the Anti-Gun Bills for 2021 01/07/2021 10:00 AM | CHRIS EGER AND HERE COME THE ANTI-GUN BILLS FOR 2021

https://www.guns.com/news/2021/01/07/and-here-come-the-anti-gun-bills-for-2021 Don't let the momentary interruption fool you, lawmakers on Capitol Hill have been able to submit a flurry of nationwide gun control proposals to be considered by the Democrat-controlled legislature.

The 117th U.S. Congress gaveled into session this week, and at least a half-dozen anti-gun measures have been filed already with the House Judiciary Committee. The majority of those, four bills, were submitted by Rep. Shelia Jackson Lee, D-Texas, with the fifth and sixth filed by Reps. Bobby Rush, D-Ill., and Al Green, D-Texas, respectively.

Related: Republican Lawmakers Reboot Hearing Protection Act, Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act

While the proposed texts and summaries for these legislative measures are not yet available to the public, the titles seem largely self-explanatory and likely mimic bills previously submitted by the same lawmakers in past sessions.

The proposals:

H.R.30 - To increase public safety by punishing and deterring firearms trafficking.

H.R.121 - To provide for the hiring of 200 additional Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agents and investigators to enforce gun laws.

H.R.125 - To amend Title 18, United States Code, to provide for a 7-day waiting period before a semiautomatic firearm, a silencer, armor piercing ammunition, or a large capacity ammunition magazine may be transferred.

H.R.127 - To provide for the licensing of firearm and ammunition possession and the registration of firearms, and to prohibit the possession of certain ammunition.

H.R.130 - To require the safe storage of firearms and ammunition, and to require the investigation of reports of improper storage of firearms or ammunition.

H.R.167 - To prohibit the transfer of a firearm at a gun show by a person who is not a federally licensed firearms dealer.

3
BetsyRossgirl 3 points ago +3 / -0

You have to be 21 to buy a gun according to this bill, but you can have a baby ruthlessly ripped from your body at 16. You can change your gender way younger, but defend yourself?- nah -sheila Jackson lee wants you to be a good little servant and do as the government says

3
Saltyfollower0101 3 points ago +3 / -0

COME AND TAKE IT

3
DAKKREDWHITEandBLUE 3 points ago +3 / -0

Might be because of the mods. they seem to only sticky certain things.. i think they've lost their balls and are falling in line with ole Beijing biden

3
Chickenbaconpoutine 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Attorney General shall make the contents of the database accessible to all members of the public

So some criminals can just look up who's got guns in their neighborhood, wait for them to be gone and go steal them. What could go wrong.

3
TangerineShine 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is a move to provoke us into violence. This is going to fail on a grand scale. Legislators have presented very similar bills in the past.

Plus not many people own guns, most gun owners lost their firearms in tragic boating accidents this past fall.

I will say: if they tax ammo that’s really going to piss me off. I started collecting rounds for all the firearms I lost in MY boating accident. I helps remind me of all the thousands of rounds I’ve shot in my life. It allows me to reminisce on how proficient a sharpshooter I became. Don’t tax the ammo, it’s all I have left :(

2
Counterforce1 [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Oh you didn’t hear about the ammo tax and the FFL tax stamp you will need for all guns and each magazine??

You’re gonna be pretty pissed by the end of the afternoon fren :)

0
TangerineShine 0 points ago +2 / -2

Bro you need to calm the fuck down, in terms of optics you appear to be a “provocateur”.

I understand this is serious shit they are proposing.

Go form a milita

3
Counterforce1 [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

How is pointing to a lawmakers ACTIVE ATTEMPT TO SUSPEND 2A somehow twisted into being a “provocateur”??

Does having an unelected sham government attempting the final step before a genocide of their political opponents get you provoked or something?

3
HenkZeilstra 3 points ago +3 / -0

WHO KEEPS VOTING THIS BITCH

4
ikeepforgettingname 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dominion

2
BadRadDad 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/127/text#HB50613C625124C4CA51FA1F17321BD30

The database will be public...so everyone knows your info and how many weapons are stored at the house...now that sounds like a peachy idea!

2
beta-detector 2 points ago +2 / -0

"H.R.127 - Sabika Sheikh Firearm Licensing and Registration Act"

In the name of Islam, end the 2A!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
BasedofAce 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh look, sponsored by the dumbest ugliest retard in congress. I dont think theres any way this one passes, but it shows what they would do...

2
Ballind 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are avoiding the gun topic altogether. Since the rebrand, not just tonight. Starting to think the mods are compromised.

2
SoEmergence 2 points ago +2 / -0

HR 1 and Domestic Terrorism Act should also be on watch

2
Erikabodereka 2 points ago +2 / -0

This Act may be cited as the “Sabika Sheikh Firearm Licensing and Registration Act”. Pardon me? What the hell is this?

2
redditadminssuckit 2 points ago +2 / -0

BUY GUNS AND AMMO NOW

2
invalid_data 2 points ago +2 / -0

This Act may be cited as the “Shitty Shitty Firearm Licensing and Registration Act”.

2
censorthisss 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was stickied earlier today

2
BabyLivesMatter2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Licenses will be like the Marijuana tax act, whereas they don't exist and no one can buy one so you'll have to turn in your gun or face imprisonment.

2
RentedMule 2 points ago +2 / -0

So, one of the top lines states that when you register, you have to state the date of acquisition of the firearm. Most of my firearms were either gifted or inherited. I wouldn't have a clue as to what specific date each one was acquired. What then? Is registration denied, and the firearm seized?

On a second note, to the few idiots who think this bill is a good idea, replace the word "firearm" with "vote". Do you like it now?