They are fully aware of that statistic, it just isn't useful in their PR right now. Don't worry, after they confiscate people's rifles, they will move the goalposts and confiscate handguns.
This is not about gun safety. Confiscating rifles is hugely important to them as a long term goal. If you want to run a totalitarian government that demonizes political opposition, you can't let people own rifles. You just... well, you just can't.
Absolutely. The game plan is to ban "assault rifles" and then once that is done there will be cries of "ITS NOT ENOUGH! AND HANDGUNS CAUSE THE MOST DEATHS"
Then they'll set their sights on banning handguns.
Then after handguns it will be "sniper rifles" (any semi-automatic rifle) which they'll label as extremely dangerous, powerful sniper rifles.
Shotguns will be the last thing left and then they'll go after those.
All rifles <3% of gun violence.
Hand guns greater than 70%.
This tells you everything you need to know about this policy.
It's not about gun violence. It's about disarming us but everyone here already knows this...
They are fully aware of that statistic, it just isn't useful in their PR right now. Don't worry, after they confiscate people's rifles, they will move the goalposts and confiscate handguns.
This is not about gun safety. Confiscating rifles is hugely important to them as a long term goal. If you want to run a totalitarian government that demonizes political opposition, you can't let people own rifles. You just... well, you just can't.
Absolutely. The game plan is to ban "assault rifles" and then once that is done there will be cries of "ITS NOT ENOUGH! AND HANDGUNS CAUSE THE MOST DEATHS"
Then they'll set their sights on banning handguns.
Then after handguns it will be "sniper rifles" (any semi-automatic rifle) which they'll label as extremely dangerous, powerful sniper rifles.
Shotguns will be the last thing left and then they'll go after those.
No no no, "sniper rifles" will be defined by them as deer rifles.