They are actors, not journalists.
There are very few true journalists left. There are myriad surfeit of anchors. Anchors are heavy pieces of weight that hold you in place, they do not set you free to sail beyond the horizon.
Actors are professional liars. They play a role in order to convince you that they are something that they are not. In the case of anchors, that role is "Somebody intelligent with an opinion worth listening to."
Actors are professional liars.
Anchors are actors.
They're not good actors though, they're more whores who say whatever is put in front of them for money.
Anchors are Activists. They are not for Truth, they are for their employers agenda.
Whenever I meet someone who says they are an actor... "A professional liar. Must take real talent."
You are auto assuming they are human at all
Yes they are C level actors too ugly for Movies but decent enough to be on camera. They also can read.
Been telling everyone who will listen to view them as actors for years now, they are.
The day after the Mueller Report came out, Chris Cuomo had a spot in which he showed a pile of papers, maybe a 8 inches tall. He said he printed the whole thing out and read the whole thing. He repeatedly referred to the stack of paper a said over and over that he read the whole thing, the WHOLE THING, and that everything the right wing said about it was a lie because he read IT ALL.
The problem is, the stack of papers looked like it was in perfect order. Like it was so neat that it just came out of paper packaging they usually come in. It was all so perfectly new.
I read a lot of printed out stacks of paper. I've never had a stack of paper 8 inches tall that was so perfect by the time I had read every single word. Never. It takes time to read that much. Paper gets folded, bent, coffee gets spilled and the edges fray. Even if he read ALL 8 inches in one sitting in a couple of hours, it wouldn't look like that.
I think Chris Cuomo lied and the reason why he insisted to avidly that he had read that stack of papers, every word, was because he wanted us to believe he had read it.
The point being,Chris Cuomo was acting and he wasn't even very good at it. yet, he thinks we're so gullible, we can't see the stack of papers is nearly pristine and perfect and just came out of a box. The stack of papers was a prop. It blew me away because it was the first thing I had watched on CNN for about five years before that. I was amazed at the bold faced lying.
Well yeah they read of teleprompters. Only diagnosed retards think it's their own thoughts and have any clue about the topics they are told to talk about.
Go watch out of shadows itll blow your mind
Anchors are the trusted faces of the propaganda.
Now, late night "comedy" hosts are the "wacky jesters" delivering propaganda via thinly veiled screeds masquerading as stand up bits and sketches. (contrast the likes of Johnny Carson, Leno, even early Conan and maybe even early Letterman) - politics were always mentioned, but it wasn't a 500mg dose of propagandized metanarrative. I don't know how Colbert stays on the air, honestly. Even if I agreed with his politics, the presentation is such a one note bugle. "Orange Man Bad!!!!!" for 5 hours a week from a boomer white guy who chose to pronounce his family surname with an affectation not shared by his siblings. It's clownworld, and these clowns aint funny.
I believe the last true journalist I saw was Walter Kronkite. He was a Democrat but you would never know it from watching him. He just reported factual news in a straightforward manner without putting his spin on it. Back in those days they had an actual editor who aired separately on the news. And “these views do not necessarily reflect those of this network”. Now what is so difficult about going back to that?
YES