302 CAN SOMEONE TELL ME: WHY DOES BIDEN NEED 25K NATIONAL GUARD, BUT THE CITIZEN CAN'T HAVE 1A, 2A; ARMS AND SPEECH? (media.patriots.win) posted 76 days ago by Srslydonnald 76 days ago by Srslydonnald +302 / -0 14 comments share 14 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (14) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 1 ▼ – AnnaGram 1 point 76 days ago +2 / -1 ...we do have 1A and 2A? I'm all for addressing the problems we're all dealing with, but pretending like we don't have these rights is counterproductive. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Srslydonnald [S] 2 points 76 days ago +2 / -0 We do. But they're trying to censor any truth or even statement they don't like or want to make public, and they're trying to curb 2A. We do have them. But it's on his agenda to ban verbal critics and opponents, and abolish 2A. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – AnnaGram 1 point 76 days ago +2 / -1 Oh I hadn't seen anything about restricting 1a permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – GilaMonsterous 1 point 76 days ago +1 / -0 They're just getting big tech to do it for them. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – AnnaGram 1 point 76 days ago +1 / -0 I mean, by definition a private company can't restrict or violate your 1st ammendment rights permalink parent save report block reply
...we do have 1A and 2A? I'm all for addressing the problems we're all dealing with, but pretending like we don't have these rights is counterproductive.
We do. But they're trying to censor any truth or even statement they don't like or want to make public, and they're trying to curb 2A.
We do have them. But it's on his agenda to ban verbal critics and opponents, and abolish 2A.
Oh I hadn't seen anything about restricting 1a
They're just getting big tech to do it for them.
I mean, by definition a private company can't restrict or violate your 1st ammendment rights