232
Comments (8)
sorted by:
5
raytwentynine 5 points ago +5 / -0

Which is why the "no widespread cheating" meme is stupid. No, it wasn't widespread cheating, it was very targeted and focused cheating in a few counties.

1
Olds77 1 point ago +1 / -0

I disagree. I believe they cheated in Virginia and North Carolina as well and who knows where else using Dominion and other systems to shave votes. It was most obvious in a few counties.

2
Pirate_Lafitte 2 points ago +2 / -0

There was cheating in Texas. Just because they caught that one ballot harvester, doesn't mean the harvested votes weren't counted or there weren't others that didn't get caught

1
Olds77 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was also that one conservative county that used dominion and they flipped it with it.

1
Pirate_Lafitte 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was in several states, so it was widespread.

3
Glue_sniffer1000 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's why they keep pushing the idea of there being no "widespread" fraud. It never needed to be widespread.

3
mightiest_m 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah the graph of bellwether counties is hilarious to show people too. There's not even a defense for that - If that happened ANYWHERE else we'd automatically write of the election as a Banana republic affair.

That's what iratates me most - it's actually really really sloppy and obvious how bad and targeted the cheating was.

2
Jabron661 2 points ago +2 / -0

3 Counties, sure, absolutely. Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia stone cold fraud caught in all of them.

But it was still way more than that. Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada al had major documented fraud.

Toss in Virginia and Minnesota for good measure. And I don't know if enough fraud was done in New York and California to swing them to Trump there was certainly enough to swing many races.