I think they will if it’s the right issue and the right judge. The judges who refused to hear the election fraud cases just wanted Trump the person gone, not necessarily his policies.
Papa T appointed 3 supreme court justices, Pedo Joe accused another one of rape decades ago, look how that turned out for the Prez. There are no friendly judges, just whores with their hands outstretched waiting for a John with a fat wallet.
The right has been pushing for honest, originalist, textualist judges. They wanted to counter activist leftist judges by appointing judges that wanted to follow the law to the letter and not put personal opinions in the way.
Problem is, that fails to actually advance conservatism or limiting government. A progressive judge will happily ignore or reinterpret law as they please. But a Federalist Society judge won’t. They’ll be hesitant to upset the status quo or establish precedent.
The answer to liberal justices is to get activist conservatives, not textualists. Or a cloning vat so we can get 9 Scalia’s.
This is wrong though. Our judges except for Thomas aren't following the constitution. They are just like the leftist judges, they just have different areas where they make shit up in.
Federalist Society judges have been just as interpretationalist just on different things. Look at how they have reinterpreted the plain language of the Sherman Act which basically said no monopolies ever, into only the specified identifiers in the Act should be cared about.
WE FOUGHT SO HARD, BUT DIDN'T GET VERY FAR. IN THE END, IT DIDN'T EVEN MATTERRRRRRR. CAUSE YOU KILLED YOURSELF OUT OF DESPAIR.
I do no understand why we don't find a friendly judge and sue...just like they did?
Wait, so none of the judges Mitch passed are gonna help us?
-astronaut with a gun-
Nope
That’s why they were approved from my perspective. It will take a lot to change my mind
I think they will if it’s the right issue and the right judge. The judges who refused to hear the election fraud cases just wanted Trump the person gone, not necessarily his policies.
But they HAD to know what the far left's Policies were gonna be!
Packing Courts, open borders, Green Deal.... They knew it would be opposite Trump's
I actually read that’s why they’re not publishing the EOs. They can’t challenge something that isn’t published
WTF
Papa T appointed 3 supreme court justices, Pedo Joe accused another one of rape decades ago, look how that turned out for the Prez. There are no friendly judges, just whores with their hands outstretched waiting for a John with a fat wallet.
The right has been pushing for honest, originalist, textualist judges. They wanted to counter activist leftist judges by appointing judges that wanted to follow the law to the letter and not put personal opinions in the way.
Problem is, that fails to actually advance conservatism or limiting government. A progressive judge will happily ignore or reinterpret law as they please. But a Federalist Society judge won’t. They’ll be hesitant to upset the status quo or establish precedent.
The answer to liberal justices is to get activist conservatives, not textualists. Or a cloning vat so we can get 9 Scalia’s.
This is wrong though. Our judges except for Thomas aren't following the constitution. They are just like the leftist judges, they just have different areas where they make shit up in.
Federalist Society judges have been just as interpretationalist just on different things. Look at how they have reinterpreted the plain language of the Sherman Act which basically said no monopolies ever, into only the specified identifiers in the Act should be cared about.
That ONE LONELY MAGA judge in Texas can't spend ALL his time blocking Joe's EOs.
Sadly, he won't be helped out by Trump's other appointees.
Underrated post.