4219
Comments (242)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
42
Viewer01 42 points ago +42 / -0

WE FOUGHT SO HARD, BUT DIDN'T GET VERY FAR. IN THE END, IT DIDN'T EVEN MATTERRRRRRR. CAUSE YOU KILLED YOURSELF OUT OF DESPAIR.

42
ginpunk 42 points ago +42 / -0

I do no understand why we don't find a friendly judge and sue...just like they did?

14
Avykins 14 points ago +15 / -1

Papa T appointed 3 supreme court justices, Pedo Joe accused another one of rape decades ago, look how that turned out for the Prez. There are no friendly judges, just whores with their hands outstretched waiting for a John with a fat wallet.

15
Akohekohe 15 points ago +15 / -0

The right has been pushing for honest, originalist, textualist judges. They wanted to counter activist leftist judges by appointing judges that wanted to follow the law to the letter and not put personal opinions in the way.

Problem is, that fails to actually advance conservatism or limiting government. A progressive judge will happily ignore or reinterpret law as they please. But a Federalist Society judge won’t. They’ll be hesitant to upset the status quo or establish precedent.

The answer to liberal justices is to get activist conservatives, not textualists. Or a cloning vat so we can get 9 Scalia’s.