354
Comments (8)
sorted by:
4
Wind-chasing_luhua 4 points ago +4 / -0

Embargo Communism and Socialism.

4
MudDog 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well no shit, Sherlock!

2
Watermelons 2 points ago +3 / -1

This paper reads like the meme where the guy is connecting the strings of a conspiracy theory.

The conclusion might be correct, but the way to get there is 193 pages of crap.

1
winningX3 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't read it but damn the first author is a beast:

Steven Quay is the founder of Seattle-based Atossa Therapeutics Inc. (Nasdaq:ATOS), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing novel therapeutics and for breast cancer, other breast conditions, and COVID-19 therapeutics. He received his an M.D. and Ph.D. from The University of Michigan, was a postdoctoral fellow at MIT with Nobel Laureate H. Gobind Khorana, a resident at the Harvard-MGH Hospital, and was on the faculty of Stanford University School of Medicine. His contributions to medicine have been cited over 9,600 times. He has founded six startups, invented seven FDA-approved pharmaceuticals, and holds 87 US patents. Over 80 million people have benefited from the medicines he invented. His current passion is the prevention of the two million yearly breast cancer cases worldwide.

1
me-no-likely2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Heard this guy on the Warroom today. The commies need to pay.

1
Lowilson6170 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fauci Gates and others paid for it! Fuck CCP and these deep staters

-1
Watermelons -1 points ago +2 / -3

Good Lord. This guy is a charlatan. Page 21 discounts his entire analysis. Specifically this line. To paraphrase I didn't like the numbers so I changed them.

Since some of the probability calculations have astronomical values which would make a single such evidence statement, if inputted directly, swamp any further calculation and make their later contribution mute, a decision was made to simply treat quantitative probabilities as significant at the p = 0.05 level, no matter how much ‘more significant’ the calculation suggested.

2
GeneralFlynn 2 points ago +2 / -0

There’s value to what he’s doing here in beginning his analysis and such... put when publishing a statistical paper?

Use the significant figures. For fuck’s sake.