I feel like all the media people are building right now is too fleeting.
We need something that people can read in one sit to get into the rabbit hole that is the red pill.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
I feel like all the media people are building right now is too fleeting.
We need something that people can read in one sit to get into the rabbit hole that is the red pill.
Infogalactic
Infogalactic
https://infogalactic.com/info/Main_Page
We're building a site for data collection for exactly this reason
does it not suck?
lol we're gonna find out!
if I can help just dm me, I can code and sysadmin, also have good experience with UX and publicity
I can’t do any of those things but I know a LOT of dumb shit. For “fact checking” and all.
What I would do is mirror wikipedia (so that URLs are preserved) and then have people redirect maybe via hosts file or a simple browser plugin to that site.
Others have already mentioned it, but have you tried Infogalactic?
We're building it inside our brains
that's not effective, if that accomplished something better than books and internet sites we wouldn't be having this conversation.
I think it's effective. I know stuff that you won't find on any wiki pages.
If we're not all becoming well versed in the events of the last 4 years, on a personal level, we won't be able to do much.
A Magawiki would be cool though. For however long it lasts
conservapedia isn't well maintained or that publicly accessible. really do need a new & real Wikipedia. Citizendium looked like something, but it's not quite the same (and I think Sanger is also liberal)
yeah, that's what I meant too with "doesn't suck"… Conservapedia is just too obvious also. Why not call it something unbiased (because truth isn't "conservative", truth is truth)? It would be more inviting to "moderates" and whatnot.
unfortunately we're in a time period where common sense is automatically regarded as white supremacy/alt right/kkk/etc
that's why people should drop the branding of "conservative" a least in the specific actual branding of the site
Can’t we just download wikipedia complete archive, set the site active, and then instate a MAGA moderation policy. Initially, the lies will remain. Eventually, they will be sifted out.
Centi-Pedia taken?
yeah, Wikipedia's content license allows it if attribution is given
also i don't think Centipedia is taken. dunno. would be nice if doggos hosted a Wikipedia for MAGA
Wiki.Win
OH YES THIS NEEDS TO HAPPEN!
haha, good one
Magapill.com
I would love for archived version of the old Encyclopaedia Brittanica to be online. There's a lot of honest information in them that you won't find anywhere anymore.
https://www.1902encyclopedia.com
Can you please stop killing my movement with your facts and logic?