4061
Comments (237)
sorted by:
231
deleted 231 points ago +233 / -2
145
MySidesGoUp 145 points ago +148 / -3

He was luckier than Lucky Larry Silverstein

51
deleted 51 points ago +53 / -2
32
Iteachfuckingscience 32 points ago +33 / -1

What a lucky guy!

25
BestTimeToBAlive 25 points ago +26 / -1

Several Billion$ off of the fall of WTC on 9/11

https://i.imgur.com/VDUJQq7.jpg

10
MySidesGoUp 10 points ago +10 / -0

These are the social hedge funds that mirror the parasitic behavior that happens in financial markets.

Seems to be the same ones gambling in each market....ahh this is just ‘conspiracy theory’...mmm McDonald’s....jojo is gay...I love Amazon....

35
LibertarianXian 35 points ago +36 / -1

He simply made the decision to pull it, what's da big deal

34
SurfingUSA 34 points ago +34 / -0

? Larry cleared a cool 💲 4.5 billion.

💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵

https://gothamist.com/news/wtc-insurance-payout-totals-455-billion

TALK ABOUT LUCKY!

23
independentbystander 23 points ago +23 / -0

If I remember correctly, Silverstein also tried to double-dip the insurance/get paid twice. Lucky indeed!

7
SurfingUSA 7 points ago +7 / -0

... succeeded! ...

5
CEO_of_Muslims 5 points ago +5 / -0

If lawyers told me I could do that, I would. Car equivalent, you get smashed on both sides by two different cars.. you absolutely go after both (hopefully) insured drivers, for the total amount allowable. And then you negotiate.

That part of the Larry story is not the issue

5
Florida_pede 5 points ago +5 / -0

Way to go Larry! You lucky bastard!!

7
MemeWarsVet 7 points ago +7 / -0

Luckier than potato!

3
SomaliSwede_RapeBaby 3 points ago +3 / -0

LUCKY CIRCUMCISION, RABBI!!!

29
ravioli_king [S] 29 points ago +30 / -1

As much as George is always the easy answer... I'm gonna need some proof or evidence. That way I can spread it around.

78
War_Hamster 78 points ago +78 / -0

This is not new. There's a ton of info available with a simple search.

Here's one example: http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/september-eleven/put-options.htm

Happy hunting.

52
sevans77 52 points ago +52 / -0

Thank you. Wow, obvious now, why DJT was so hated. No one wants their crimes uncovered and he did an amazing job pulling back the curtain of so much evil. I know this was about 911, but it shows just how evil the elites are. How very little they care about human life and what they will do to start a war...anything to line their own pockets.

76
Granny 76 points ago +76 / -0

They killed 100,000's of people by withholding HCQ, so that they could have their mail-in fraud election.

25
UnmaskedPatriot 25 points ago +25 / -0

That's what you call a bona-fide conspiracy. It's no theory!

23
Bouldabassed 23 points ago +23 / -0

The thing that kills me the most about that isn't that it happened, it's that they have since backpedaled and said "HCQ is actually okay after all" and not a single NPC bats an eye. Hell, they probably aren't even aware of it.

16
Pickinpox 16 points ago +16 / -0

Exactly right friend. The only thing the NPC remembers is that Geotus wants to inject bleach into everyone.

7
YourWifesBoyfriend 7 points ago +7 / -0

"Drumph told me to drink bleach and eat UV light and that's why I died"

Fake outrage commences...

6
War_Hamster 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'll even take that a step further. Think of all the "elites" around the world who have no idea they are serving the will of the Cabal. They are either too greedy for self-reflection or too stupid to recognize they are playing for the wrong team. This applies to a lot of the gov't functionaries who simply protect the State because it protects their own selfish interests.

4
RachetQueen2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

And coming full circle.. Hoemala's ex boo Willie Brown who was the Mayor of San Francisco at the time said he was told not go fly that day to a Mayor's conference...

11
Stefanos 11 points ago +12 / -1

Fascinating link, but Soros is not Israeli, in fact his globalist BS has seen him banned from Israel. Is he linked in some other way?

7
War_Hamster 7 points ago +8 / -1

There's official Israel and DS Israel.

Soros is part of the latter, I believe.

5
Stefanos 5 points ago +6 / -1

At face value I could believe that of him, but Israel has banned him, so not really sure.

Im not quite buying the israel links at this point.

2
deleted 2 points ago +6 / -4
5
CanadianTrump 5 points ago +5 / -0

While I don’t agree at all with official story, the chance one only 1 person that died in NYC at the world trade centre was jewish is absolutely laughable. There is no way.

“Jews in New York City Jews in New York City comprise approximately 13 percent of the city 's population, making the Jewish community the largest in the world outside of Israel” As per wiki

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Anomalies, I tell you, and always in the same direction.

3
Dr0neRec0very 3 points ago +4 / -1

Made up Stormfront faggotry, I tell you, and tongue always in the same direction (up your boyfriend's rectum).

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, we know the people who died, wouldn't be hard to check. I can believe some people happened to take the day off though

4
day221 4 points ago +4 / -0

Millions of dollars is nothing and more than likely those people had many other positions / hedges as part of general investment. If it were some insider thing you'd see a lot more money involved.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, we also don't get to see all of the trades. A lot of the big money deals are done off-exchange.

17
complythis 17 points ago +17 / -0

Watch "9 ⁄11 The Luckiest Man Alive" on YouTube https://youtu.be/Hf

37
9
Iteachfuckingscience 9 points ago +9 / -0

PLEASE CALP

3
YourWifesBoyfriend 3 points ago +3 / -0

unlucky user name with that spelling error

3
augustinius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jeb! for alt-tech!

2
ProudlyConservative 2 points ago +2 / -0

I watched the video. I am so confused now. What does this mean? He knew there'd be planes flying into the buildings a few weeks before? There were also bombs in the buildings? I saw a video of a Dr on YouTube talking about how the buildings just basically disappeared and there was no rubble. It was interesting.

14
rastren 14 points ago +14 / -0

And... It's gone!

8
crazyjackel 8 points ago +8 / -0

Video was pulled it seems.

4
pcme2 4 points ago +4 / -0

that u tube link is dead hehe no suprize eh

1
BostonVoter 1 point ago +1 / -0

They took it down

2
Anticommuniste2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why is it always Toronto and Frankfurt....

13
fthecoup 13 points ago +13 / -0

Wasn't Durham supposed to release a report by now?

12
Bigsweaties 12 points ago +13 / -1

No. US Attorney John Durham has a Grand Jury and Grand Juries do not issue reports. They issue criminal charges. That being said... where is Durham?

17
anon1011101 17 points ago +18 / -1

Being a useless sack of shit just like every other person who's supposed to actually uphold the rule of law

5
dougkeenan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hey! That one guy got probation!

5
Darkheartisland 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yet if you protest about a stolen election you are a terrorist that should get 20 years in prison.

3
Anticommuniste2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kevin Clinesmith. I’ll be using his name constantly bc I refuse to let them sweep it under the rug. Use the fuckers name.

2
Pickinpox 2 points ago +2 / -0

Couple hundred hours of community service, that'll show em

4
trumpORbust 4 points ago +4 / -0

Eating chicken with bagpipe and smoking crack with hunter

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
7
Nikola_S1 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's not much for him.

4
I_Only_Win 4 points ago +4 / -0

He short casino stocks right before the vegas shooting too. He’s a real clairvoyant

137
blitzstrasse 137 points ago +137 / -0

Weaponized autism will always give me a Patriot boner. Change my mind.

47
deleted 47 points ago +48 / -1
11
Ophelia 11 points ago +11 / -0

I cancelled my TV. I’m ready to serve.

2
trumpORbust 2 points ago +2 / -0

Much to find --+-- so much more firm the memory hole

4
CleetzMcGeetz69 4 points ago +4 / -0

Patriot Missile

4
sentient-potato 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ladyboner here, confirmed.

98
deleted 98 points ago +111 / -13
50
deleted 50 points ago +58 / -8
34
arebee 34 points ago +44 / -10

What an antisemite!!! How dare he! They can’t just go on the Internet, say these things and get away with it!!! We need laws, anti talking about Jews even if it’s the truth laws!

17
Uncle_Remus 17 points ago +19 / -2

Don't worry. Ol One-Eyed Crenshaw is on the case.

-20
deleted -20 points ago +3 / -23
20
Skepticconservative 20 points ago +20 / -0

Hey fellow caterpillar, been here long?

6
deleted 6 points ago +10 / -4
4
deleted 4 points ago +9 / -5
-2
deleted -2 points ago +5 / -7
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
-1
arebee -1 points ago +1 / -2

No idea what you’re talking about

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
49
CelesteD 49 points ago +52 / -3

I like my women like I like my world trade center 7, going down for no reason at all

15
K3719er 15 points ago +16 / -1

I like my women how I like my scotch, 12 yrs old and loaded with coke - hunter biden probably

9
TheClassicalLiberal 9 points ago +9 / -0

That was so wrong ... but so funny.

4
ZhouBai-Den 4 points ago +4 / -0

I like my women like I like my coffee. Ground up in a bag in the freezer. /s

1
CelesteD 1 point ago +1 / -0

feel the Bern!

3
buco 3 points ago +7 / -4

"I want a nasty little Jewish Princess" .......

0
paradox123 0 points ago +8 / -8

Remember the plane that also crashed that day. It was the one designated for building 7.

5
RabidZoo 5 points ago +13 / -8

The one in PA that they found no wreckage or bodies at?

7
45willwinagain 7 points ago +11 / -4

LOL, you can't actually believe that.

0
honkpillfarmer 0 points ago +2 / -2

Funny how your swallow wholesale the claims and assertions of the government re: 9/11 but are woke to the election fraud. Perhaps it's time to reexamine. Because you believe absolute bullshit about 9/11, and are a total faggot.

1
45willwinagain 1 point ago +3 / -2

you clearly don't know my opinions on 9/11 otherwise you wouldn't be running your man-pleaser like you are.

newsflash shit-dick... people can think some fuckery was afoot on 9/11 without believing someone spent 6 months demolishing walls and running thousands of miles of det cord and e-match wire and cutting charges all over a building (and somehow remaining undetected) in order to preform your bullshit "controlled demolition" fairytale make believe.

you should look into the definition of "controlled opposition"

you regurgitating outlandish bullshit theories is exactly what they want you to do.

nice work retard

5
45willwinagain 5 points ago +10 / -5

no it wasn't.

that plane was going to go wherever the hell the piece of shit flying it decided it would.

building 7 was so small on the skyline compared to the buildings around the WTC complex it would have been difficult to get in there unless it was essentially straight down into the top of it.

the 4th plane was hijacked last, it got further west than the other 3, by the time they took control it was turned around out over lake erie and started headed back twords DC

thats why, IMO, they took it down.

ANG was in the air at that point, any plane not identifying and immediately landing would have been taken out... and what better place to do it than out over shanksville PA (middle of nowhere) before it could make it back to heavily populated areas.

"let's roll" is probably the only lie about the whole 9/11 story, because people weren't ready to hear that the US military shot down a passenger plane full of US citizens...

they still aren't.

but 7 fell for the same exact reason the other two fell... because slowly heating the metal supports of a damaged area of a building eventually reaches a point where that damaged area can no longer hold the weight of the building above it.

so it fails.

it's why the building that got hit second fell first... because the damage was lower on the tower and therefore it had to hold more weight so it failed faster.

all this dogshit about patriot missiles and windowless planes and whatever the theory is this week... it's all just distractions to make anyone who questions the people who planned it, and let it happen, look crazy.

it's much less complex than the glowies try to make you believe it is.

5
trex76 5 points ago +8 / -3

Shill alert!!! All of 9 11 was a scam. Yes there were crazy stories floated but the truth was fairly easy to find if you ignore all the childish rantings about structural steel suddenly collapsing and notice no other skyscraper has collapsed due to fire. One in Spain burned for 2 fricking days and bent. Also there are no other plane crashes in history with such a small pile of airplane debris. Lots of other evidence if you use your own brain and don't listen to these shills, I mean honestly, a small fire in #7 and it also failed? RIGHT

1
45willwinagain 1 point ago +5 / -4

And no other building has had fully fueled airliners slam into them at full speed before.

Just fire isn't going to be enough, but when you scoop out three or four floors worth of structual supports, THEN set those floors on fire... the weight of the building above is more than the destroyed and weakened metal can support.

If you can't wrap your mind around simple physics you should stop acting like you know what you are talking about.

Because you don't.

also LOL @ 7 having a "small fire"

holy shit you suck at this.

6
Dennislearsysbastard 6 points ago +8 / -2

Building 7 was never hit. Were you alive then?

0
45willwinagain 0 points ago +6 / -6

Bitch I'm almost 50, I watched it all happen while i was loading up guns and ammo headed to the cabin.

Building 7 WAS hit, buy two of the largest buildings in the country collapsing right next to it.

https://911fantasyworld.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/wtc7corner.jpg

See that giant chunk carved out of the corner of building 7? Thats a big "get your fucking facts straight before you open your mouth" just for you.

5
Boomerangwrangler 5 points ago +7 / -2

The DIA destroyed 2.5 TB of data on Able Danger, but that’s OK because it probably wasn’t important. http://web.archive.org/web/20050922032625/http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/print?id=1131137

The SEC destroyed their records on the investigation into the insider trading before the attacks, but that’s OK because destroying the records of the largest investigation in SEC history is just part of routine record keeping. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/06/sec-government-destroyed-documents-regarding-pre-911-put-options.html

NIST has classified the data that they used for their model of WTC7’s collapse, but that’s OK because knowing how they made their model of that collapse would “jeopardize public safety“. http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-12/nist-denies-access-wtc-collapse-data http://cryptome.org/nist070709.pdf

More here: https://www.corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy-theory/

-1
45willwinagain -1 points ago +4 / -5

you don't seem to be picking up what i'm putting down.

Everything you said still fits into the theory that the people who planned it and allowed it to happen love it when internet jackoffs mouth fuck each other with extra chromosome theories about patriot missiles and windowless planes.

It's called controlled opposition.

Nobody will take you seriously if you keep deepthroating nonsense.

3
GreatHumungous 3 points ago +4 / -1

Oh what happened to building 7 then?

-2
45willwinagain -2 points ago +2 / -4

https://911fantasyworld.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/wtc7corner.jpg

The entire corner of the building was scooped out by the collapse of two of the largest buildings in the country right next door.

it then caught fire.

As the fire burned the structural steel looses it's ability to support the weight of the building above it.

Once the weight of the building was more than the slowly failing supporting structure could support, the support failed and the building fell into the damaged area.

It's exactly how/why the other two towers collapsed.

buildings are heavy.

0
TruthWillOut 0 points ago +1 / -1

"Just fire isn't going to be enough, but when you scoop out three or four floors worth of structural supports, THEN set those floors on fire... the weight of the building above is more than the destroyed and weakened metal can support."

False. Why are you lying?

WTC 1 & 2 had ALL floors FULLY SUPORTED by the multitude of giant core beams constructed in the middle of the buildings surrounded by the heavily reinforced concrete shaft.

This design was created to ensure that both towers could withstand not one but multiple crashes of airliners. It didn't matter how much of the outer walls was destroyed as they just acted like fly screens on a door or window, which you can poke as many holes you like through but that doesn't effect the rigidity or stability of the actual door/window.

The "official fairy tale" also completely omitted the fact that the fire chief got all the way up to the very floors of the crash and could be heard on the recordings reporting "only small pockets of fires and nothing that one or two ladders wouldn't be able to handle".

So, the fire chief was up there IN PERSON and reported that this was not going to be a big deal. There was NO "inferno" like in the "official fairy tale" which you keep parroting.

1
45willwinagain 1 point ago +2 / -1

jesus christ you're fucking stupid...

The buildings were designed to withstand a crash of a much smaller plane flying slowly lost in the fog looking for the nearby airport (see bomber hits the empire state building)

they WERE NOT DESIGNED to withstand a fully loaded, fully fueled modern airliner flying at full speed into the buildings.

the way the towers were constructed the floors were an open design, and this was accomplished by a strong central core bridged to the outer skin (and hat trusses) vis zig zag trusses that held up pre-tensioned concrete.

the planes demolished the outer skin, multiple floors worth of zigzag trusses (in the impact zones) and the central core (thus taking out the elevators and stairs trapping people above the impact zone).

the impact also blew all the fireproofing insulation off the trusses in the impact zone.

you seem to have a very weak and cherry picked concept of how the buildings were constructed... the fact that you are here insisting that each floor was somehow cantilevered out off into space from the central core is just astonishingly stupid and demonstrates a complete lack of simple engineering understanding.

also sauce please for "the fire chief said it was just a small campfire"

you can clearly see there was thick black smoke billowing from both towers for a LONG time after the impacts... meaning the fuel (which was mostly aerosolized on impact) had long since burned away and you were seeing everything on those impacted floors burning.

chairs, desks, carpet, tons of plastic...

the north tower burned from 8:46 till it failed at 10:28 (1 hour and 42 minutes) the south tower burned for less time from 9:02 till 9:59 (56 minutes)

notice how the second tower to be hit fell first? yeah thats because it was struck lower on the tower and had more weight to hold so it failed quicker.

sustained fires weakened the damaged areas until the structure couldn't support the weight of the undamaged floors above the impact zone...

when that happened the top part of the tower fell through the damaged area and into the lower part of the towers.

buildings are heavy, the lower portions aren't able to "catch" the upper portions when they fall into them.

it's really not that complicated, and i can't for the life of me understand why you cousin fuckers can't wrap your waterheads around it.

1
honkpillfarmer 1 point ago +2 / -1

Wtc 7 caught on fire how? Which plane hit it?

0
45willwinagain 0 points ago +2 / -2

two giant buildings worth of flaming debris smashed into the ground a few feet from it...

tends to cause problems.

jesus you haven't put an ounce of research into this at all.

you can see dozens and dozens of videos of that day to see the building burning for quite some time before it fell.

but hey don't let facts and evidence get in the way of your masturbatory fantasies about lizard men and UFO's shooting patriot missiles at the twin towers.

1
HockeyMom4Trump 1 point ago +4 / -3

Many experts in physics disagree

6
GreatHumungous 6 points ago +7 / -1

Right I mean modern buildings just collapse at freefall speed due to nothing all the time.

-1
45willwinagain -1 points ago +3 / -4

so destroying multiple floors worth of structure by slamming a plane into them at full speed... including the central core where the stairs and elevators were... that probably won't contribute to a weakening of the supporting structure?

then setting that remaining damaged metal on fire and letting it cook?

thats not gonna cause issues eh?

thefuckoutta here with that trash.

6
HockeyMom4Trump 6 points ago +6 / -0

Look, I am not a physics person. But I have seen many well-regarded physicists and people familiar with fire and the science behind how buildings burn discuss it.

Personally, I don't think it hurts to ever examine and question the narrative we've been told by MSM. Look at the situation with the election. The MSM is telling us one thing, yet they are ignoring tons of evidence that fraud exists. I don't know what happened for sure on 9/11 in regard to how three buildings collapsed (include WTC Building 7, which was never hit by a plane) or how they came down at the rate of speed they did, which many in physics say defied the laws of physics. I don't have all the answers. But I do have many questions and it is always a good thing to go forward with a curious mind and an open mind in regard to seeking answers. Good luck to you and have a great Sunday.

-3
45willwinagain -3 points ago +4 / -7

many "well regarded" "experts" claim biden won the election.

stack bricks on top of an empty beer can until it's about to crush, then flick the side of the can, the bricks fall at "near freefall speed".

thats what things do when what is holding them up stops holding them up.

1
honkpillfarmer 1 point ago +3 / -2

Take the L, reddit fag

0
45willwinagain 0 points ago +3 / -3

suck the D conspirtatard.

3
Kraken_V_Algorithm 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hadn't heard that. The popular story was that it was headed for the Whitehouse.

2
Sevralann 2 points ago +3 / -1

Holy shit 🤔😳

2
CelesteD 2 points ago +2 / -0

you mean the one that never made it there?

-13
FullAutoFlintlock -13 points ago +1 / -14

Don't worry, she's on Jamal's cock while you are at work.

6
chris82tk 6 points ago +6 / -0

Seek help coomer

3
PensivePatriot 3 points ago +5 / -2

let’s just say this ain’t a Presbyterian problem!

68
Christopian 68 points ago +71 / -3

Red pills dropping like rain drops

38
dougkeenan 38 points ago +39 / -1

like nonflammable passports

10
Sexual-Assault-Rifle 10 points ago +10 / -0

KEK

10
MookMook 10 points ago +10 / -0

non flammable fuel-soaked passports

3
FuckReddit4545 3 points ago +3 / -0

My first red pill. I wasn't even in high school yet and I was like how in the fuck did passports survive a plane crash and building collapse?

14
War_Hamster 14 points ago +14 / -0

This seems like a good place to drop this link:

http://www.buyins.com/images/tomronk.pdf

Tom Ronk is a guy in Newport Beach who has been fighting against naked shorts for a long time. If you want to really dig into the issue of naked short selling, he's the definitive source.

Disclaimer: I know the man and can vouch for his legitimacy on this subject, but he's got some skeletons in his closet from manipulating Pink Sheets stocks.

8
SurfingUSA 8 points ago +8 / -0

Isn't this like every single other issue in the country --

naked short selling (election fraud ... illegal immigration ... etc.) is not legal but the laws are laughed off ?

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've been saying something similar for awhile. We don't lack laws, and we don't even lack some good laws. What we lack is the political will to enforce them. More specifically, our "leaders" lack the will (and motive).

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

He does know what he's talking about. I've spent 20+ years in finance and I know this sh*t really well. Ronk is a computer science PHD and a mathematical genius who has dedicated his life to the topic. He works out of his impressive garage in Newport Beach and he's got all the characteristics of a crazy hermit genius.

The problem is his skeletons involve integrity issues. I had to walk away from the project I was consulting with him on, and it was costly. I have still not recovered financially.

65
ellegrigori1 65 points ago +66 / -1

something @ trillions and rumsfeldt? airline stocks shorted but only certain ones? Extra insurance, restructured terms for the two buildings? so many things

63
angular-velocity 63 points ago +63 / -0

From Snopes (LOL): "The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (also known as the “9/11 Commission”) investigated these rumors and found that although some unusual trading activity did occur in the days prior to September 11, but it was all blah blah blah blah blah cover up blah blah blah." Fyi, if anyone doesn't know how to read Snopes (or any other 'fact checker' for that matter):

  1. Read their own modified version of the claim and see if you can point out exactly where they intentionally changed the original argument so that they can try to claim it's false later.
  2. Read, "False" and LOL.
  3. The important part: Skip to the last paragraph of the article. Literally, I've done this every time and it works. The last paragraph will contradict their own rating of the claim. In this particular case, the claim is that a ton of insanely large and suspicious airline trades were conducted immediately prior to 9/11. On September 6, 7, and 10th. Snopes then goes on to modify this claim to, "In the days just prior to the September 11 attacks, large quantities of stock in United and American Airlines were traded by persons with foreknowledge of the upcoming 9/11 attacks." See how they add that little bit at the end? "...traded BY persons with foreknowledge of the upcoming 9/11 attack."? So let me get this straight, because person A, who knew about 9/11, told person B to sell and/or short the stocks. And person B didn't know about the upcoming attack. Then this claim is "False". The Ministry of Truth are faggots.
13
SurfingUSA 13 points ago +15 / -2

Too bad, Snopes doesn't have comments, if they did, I would put a link to Franken's infamous "J3w call" audio.

https://youtu.be/byjlfHbh6AQ

5
Florida_pede 5 points ago +5 / -0

Another method is to just see if the article is about a conservative or a liberal. If it makes conservatives look good / liberals look bad, they’ll claim it’s “FALSE!!”, but if it makes conservatives look bad / liberals look good, they’ll claim True. However they have to spin it.

35
GreatHumungous 35 points ago +36 / -1

Check into all the unusual Vegas market activity before that false flag.

15
Rubberbunnies 15 points ago +15 / -0

Soros 60 days prior.

30
strictly1957 30 points ago +31 / -1

I see what you did there King... (smiles and salutes)

21
ckover9000 21 points ago +21 / -0

This was the first thing I thought about after hearing about GME. Shorting airline stocks, and whoever did itsprivacy protected by law.

21
Jappletime 21 points ago +21 / -0

Now That’s Gonna Be One Hell Of An Easter Hunt.

18
kjj9 18 points ago +20 / -2

Fuck. This guy is going to get incinerated by a space laser. Can't remember who owns it, but it is there.

2
excaliboor 2 points ago +4 / -2

I see what you did there

12
QuantumBogosity 12 points ago +12 / -0

All stocks are shorted all the time. To show that there might be something unusual you'd have to show that there was an unusually large amount of shorting and that there were no bad news or similar that might have set it off.

4
GainesvilleFlorida 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yeah I too have immediate questions. Because I’m not a sheep.

11
Drud14 11 points ago +22 / -11

Doing research is antisemitic. Don’t be racist. Curiosity killed the cat, you know!

Israel is our greatest ally!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
ArvGarv 11 points ago +11 / -0

Could also look to see whom shorted just before the chyna flu became a thing.

9
IcyHue 9 points ago +15 / -6

I hate posts like that. Either you have those info and share it or you don't.

14
maga_mama_757 14 points ago +21 / -7

I like them - it forces people who don't know anything about it to do the research themselves. If he'd just told people, they'd be less apt to believe him and/or call him a conspiracy theorist. Doing one's own research leads people to truth.

8
IcyHue 8 points ago +11 / -3

If I researched everything some random dude on twitter tells me to I wouldn't do anything else anymore. Show me the fucking info and evidence and I'll look into it. But don't just drop vague hints.

2
jubyeonin 2 points ago +3 / -1

The answer to these is "they who must not be named". Watch as the mods delete the posts and comments mentioning them.

1
IcyHue 1 point ago +2 / -1

X

-3
Nezmith -3 points ago +4 / -7

it forces people who don't know anything about it to do the research themselves

It doesn't force anyone to do anything except for people who might still naively have an interest in obscure posts

Most look at it and ignore it

5
maga_mama_757 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Forces" was the wrong word to use, so yes, you're right in that respect. However, most would look at it and skip over it it anyway, whether he'd given more information or not. I just think a curious person is more apt to believe the research and conclusions that they come to themselves when it comes to certain subjects.

6
CrankHandler1991 6 points ago +7 / -1

You can get called a conspiracy theoretard or you can let people pill themselves

-1
tufftoffee -1 points ago +2 / -3

Maybe there's a reason for that.

7
SirReginald 7 points ago +8 / -1

This was my biggest red flag. This is so easy to trace. Another woman said one of the companies on the top floors was having insane amounts of money moving out of the USA. They would have had a lot of explaining but as fate would have it, they were hit by a plane.

6
SauronWasFramed 6 points ago +6 / -0

Please also investigate the stock market crash of 2008 that threw the election to zippy.

11
45willwinagain 11 points ago +13 / -2

That one isn't that hard...

CRA forced banks to make risky loans or else they would lose their FDIC insurance

Those banks then shuffled off their risky loans to bundlers so they could mitigate their risk.

Those paper mills bought and sold those notes until the ARM's adjusted and everyone started to default on their loans.

Then several democrats went on TV making claims of bank runs and how the economy was about to collapse.

They made it happen so they could blame bush to get that half white big eared socialist piece of shit into office to start destroying the country.

2
SauronWasFramed 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is the “they” that should be thrown into prison.

3
45willwinagain 3 points ago +4 / -1

fuck wasting prison space... get the rope.

6
lmao 6 points ago +7 / -1

Now that Trump is out of office and he didn't say anything, I'm just going to have to let it all go and not wait for an answer. Trump was the best chance, he was even in New York that day.

6
HeavenlyTrumpets 6 points ago +6 / -0

He knows. It was apparent that he knew on that very day.

3
GreatestAmericanHero 3 points ago +5 / -2

The presidents are kept on tight leashes aren't they? Even Trump dared not stray far off the beaten path.

5
TyrantsAreCucks 5 points ago +7 / -2

They probably take them into a dark room with a projector and play them the zapruder followed by more films from angles that aren't known to exist and then walk the first lady into the room in Jackie Kennedys' dress which probably implies the implication.

7
GreatestAmericanHero 7 points ago +8 / -1

I've called this election a Soft-JFK since it was evident the fix was in. Trump not wanting to be a martyr and the DS afraid of creating the martyr.

7
TyrantsAreCucks 7 points ago +7 / -0

I've called this election a Soft-JFK

They figured out they can just totally character assassinate almost anyone they need to with their stranglehold on media. Anyone else who they need to take out for whatever reason just 'commits suicice'

3
wooster81 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bill Hicks had a joke that basically said this.

5
ArcNoculus 5 points ago +6 / -1

Never forget guys. They lied to us about everything involving 9/11.

5
RedPillMAGALegend 5 points ago +5 / -0

George soros needs a massive heart attack asap. Guys the scum of the earth. First class piece of shit

8
DroppsaDuece 8 points ago +8 / -0

He has some hatchlings so his legacy will continue

1
RedPillMAGALegend 1 point ago +1 / -0

YUUUUSSSSSSSS!!!!!

4
Bronski 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pentagon missing $$$$$$$$ on 9/10...

Memory holed on 9/11

3
obamagavemeaphone 3 points ago +4 / -1

Pentagon couldn't account for $2.3 trillion

https://youtu.be/xU4GdHLUHwU

next day:

BOOM!

4
Lemontree75 4 points ago +5 / -1

Ever see the video of George Bush in the classroom in Sarasota, before the towers were struck? From his anxious expression, he knew something was going to happen!

2
LibertarianXian 2 points ago +3 / -1

He was concerned about his pet goat!

1
TruthWillOut 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not only that. He admitted live at a later public appearance that he BEFORE he went into the school was watching the FIRST plane crashing into the WTC.

Later when he was in the classroom Card reportedly came in to announce the SECOND crash to "W".

The SMOKING GUN is George Bush's school visit. What happened, and what DIDN'T happen during that visit. At the height of the "hijackings" scenario there were fourteen 14(!) planes suspected of being hijacked!

Had there been REAL terrorist attacks then the Secret Service would have rushed in and carried "W" away to a safe location, just like they "allegedly" did with Cheney that morning. But NO, here he was left sitting in the car waiting to get into the school, while there were at least 14 planes that potentially had been hijacked(!), watching the first plane strike WTC, and then later in the classroom, getting whispers of the SECOND plane striking WTC. And Secret Service had done NOTHING to secure the "President".

It was all a SHAM.

3
WuhunFastFoodCourt 3 points ago +7 / -4

Sweet Lord, forgive OP for raking this stupid shit up again. Let's cut to the chase. You blame the jews. End of story.

1
GainesvilleFlorida 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, it’s like there a few groups on here, MAGA hard workers, people right leaning but wanting a “righteous” govt leader to fix things, and some bizarro cross of conspiracy of the jews people. And I don’t understand the latter.

3
BostonVoter 3 points ago +4 / -1

This is amazing.
Some of the options on the airlines were never excersized

Meaning someone who made millions, decided to not cash in on them.

Not all. But a massive amount. Which is scary to think about

1
jubyeonin 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's weird. You can usually sell some of the contracts to fund exercising at least one. From there, you can fund everything. Maybe it was someone new to it?

0
TruthWillOut 0 points ago +1 / -1

Bernard "Buzzy" Krongard was behind the majority of the put options before 9/11.

-3
Gilead -3 points ago +1 / -4

Options hardly get exercised. They just sell the options as is.

4
Onethirty62 4 points ago +5 / -1

Whoever buys the options needs to exercise them or they lose money. Market makers will buy options at expiration and exercise them. If someone truly did not want to benefit from their options they would keep them and tell their broker not to exercise them, because most brokers will exercise in the money options at close.

2
MagaChief 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don’t automatically exercise out options though. That would mean the buyer would be short the stock he doesn’t own from buying a put.

1
Onethirty62 1 point ago +1 / -0

Puts are also automatically exercised. Your broker buys the stock for you and sells it to fulfill the contract. If you don’t have enough maintenance margin in the account, the broker may close your other position to cover it, or require you to deposit funds or charge you some sort of fee. Options and futures that close in the money are always automatically exercised, search it up. That’s one reason you never want to hold future to expiration, you will be required to take delivery of the oil or whatever the commodity is. Well some futures are cash settled. Oil is not.

1
BostonVoter 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are correct. However you are also Wrong.

When someone closes out an option. They purchase the opposite option. And square up the difference, hopefully Making a Profit. Or Closing a Loss.

So if they Bought a Call . They close it by sellington the same Call . If they sold a call. They close it by buying a call.

Before 9/11 the options were " in the money" and the person never turned it into a Profit. And It was mostly anonymous.

Regardless of whatever me or you think happened.

Someone either got caught. Got scared, was murdered, or something else.

But the volume for the 9/11 PUT options were there. And there was alot of them

2
sentient-potato 2 points ago +2 / -0

I remember reading about this at the time, it was infuriating how the media circled the wagons about the subject.

1
HOSEQ 1 point ago +2 / -1

One YUGE Question is How Much did Trump Lose with the 9/11, and then the Stock Market of 2008??? Nobody is asking that Question, are they???

1
Ottoandersson 1 point ago +9 / -8

That's antisemitic!

1
obamagavemeaphone 1 point ago +1 / -0

sssssssssSOROS

1
saltykeklobster 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s always the CIA, those evil fucks.

1
MakeFreedomRing 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/25/business/us-suggests-without-proof-stock-adviser-knew-of-9-11.html

Elgindy bribed a FBI agent while shorting airline stocks before 9-11

1
complythis 1 point ago +2 / -1

short doc about the 'luckiest man alive' Watch "9 ⁄11 The Luckiest Man Alive" on YouTube https://youtu.be/Hf

1
zippy2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Link

1
793D 1 point ago +3 / -2

lemme guess- lots of Jews?

1
18-to-life 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not this one

1
RecallGavinNewsom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where can I learn more about this? I was too young when 9/11 happened, my parents never let me watch any of it at the time.

1
Bronski 1 point ago +2 / -1

Look into who bought insurance a week before his building collapsed.

(Solomon)

1
basedboston 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Flight of the Bumble Planes answers almost every question you have about 9/11 https://www.serendipity.li/wot/plissken.htm

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
SkyKasai 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cant believe people only just realise what shorting is, i know nothing about stocks, math, fucking all that bullshit but i knew what shorting was and that they have been doing it forever! If we carry on like this were never gonna get anywhere is this mentally retarded shit hole of a world and it's populus's machinations. All the Game Stop thing is gonna do is make a few people loads of money, most others will get fuck all or nothing.. Then they are going to restrict everything, so unless you have a high amount you can add to an account when you open one you wont be able to do shit! plus the funds they will get bailed out from all this by somebody.. Its a rigged game, House Always Wins! but no matter what people find out they keep fucking going to work and paying those taxes and believing in government or 'authority' like a good little slaves.

1
winsome 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've seen this a lot. Interesting.

1
62jawbill 1 point ago +1 / -0

I bet a majority of them wear small hats.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +4 / -4
2
45willwinagain 2 points ago +4 / -2

what would you say is more common for a fire chief to say

"pull it" = destroy a large building in a major metropolis with covertly planted explosives

or

"pull it" = pull all of our people out of a structure that appears ready to fail (just like the two giant buildings right next door just did)

it's obviously short for something... whats more likely?

-1
trex76 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Paid Jackass!

1
45willwinagain 1 point ago +3 / -2

LOL, go fuck yourself shit-on-balls faggot.

Keep regurgitating tired weak ass fake dumb bullshit from Korey and Dylan

0
silflay 0 points ago +3 / -3

Doesn't matter now, the programming is fully complete. They could come out and admit to everything and still it would just be called a conspiracy theory.

0
hailXenu 0 points ago +1 / -1

This post is "antisemitic".

-1
Esco152 -1 points ago +0 / -1

Who was the democrat mayor that didnt let the evidence be thoroughly investigated?

-1
Staatssicherheit -1 points ago +1 / -2

Why don't you tell us, Nathan Fraser?

Why are we posting random twitter shit from fags who look like antifa?

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
-2
Unpopular_Opinion -2 points ago +1 / -3

So Hitler was trying to save us after all?