4061
Comments (237)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
49
CelesteD 49 points ago +52 / -3

I like my women like I like my world trade center 7, going down for no reason at all

15
K3719er 15 points ago +16 / -1

I like my women how I like my scotch, 12 yrs old and loaded with coke - hunter biden probably

9
TheClassicalLiberal 9 points ago +9 / -0

That was so wrong ... but so funny.

4
ZhouBai-Den 4 points ago +4 / -0

I like my women like I like my coffee. Ground up in a bag in the freezer. /s

1
CelesteD 1 point ago +1 / -0

feel the Bern!

3
buco 3 points ago +7 / -4

"I want a nasty little Jewish Princess" .......

0
paradox123 0 points ago +8 / -8

Remember the plane that also crashed that day. It was the one designated for building 7.

5
RabidZoo 5 points ago +13 / -8

The one in PA that they found no wreckage or bodies at?

7
45willwinagain 7 points ago +11 / -4

LOL, you can't actually believe that.

0
honkpillfarmer 0 points ago +2 / -2

Funny how your swallow wholesale the claims and assertions of the government re: 9/11 but are woke to the election fraud. Perhaps it's time to reexamine. Because you believe absolute bullshit about 9/11, and are a total faggot.

5
45willwinagain 5 points ago +10 / -5

no it wasn't.

that plane was going to go wherever the hell the piece of shit flying it decided it would.

building 7 was so small on the skyline compared to the buildings around the WTC complex it would have been difficult to get in there unless it was essentially straight down into the top of it.

the 4th plane was hijacked last, it got further west than the other 3, by the time they took control it was turned around out over lake erie and started headed back twords DC

thats why, IMO, they took it down.

ANG was in the air at that point, any plane not identifying and immediately landing would have been taken out... and what better place to do it than out over shanksville PA (middle of nowhere) before it could make it back to heavily populated areas.

"let's roll" is probably the only lie about the whole 9/11 story, because people weren't ready to hear that the US military shot down a passenger plane full of US citizens...

they still aren't.

but 7 fell for the same exact reason the other two fell... because slowly heating the metal supports of a damaged area of a building eventually reaches a point where that damaged area can no longer hold the weight of the building above it.

so it fails.

it's why the building that got hit second fell first... because the damage was lower on the tower and therefore it had to hold more weight so it failed faster.

all this dogshit about patriot missiles and windowless planes and whatever the theory is this week... it's all just distractions to make anyone who questions the people who planned it, and let it happen, look crazy.

it's much less complex than the glowies try to make you believe it is.

5
trex76 5 points ago +8 / -3

Shill alert!!! All of 9 11 was a scam. Yes there were crazy stories floated but the truth was fairly easy to find if you ignore all the childish rantings about structural steel suddenly collapsing and notice no other skyscraper has collapsed due to fire. One in Spain burned for 2 fricking days and bent. Also there are no other plane crashes in history with such a small pile of airplane debris. Lots of other evidence if you use your own brain and don't listen to these shills, I mean honestly, a small fire in #7 and it also failed? RIGHT

1
45willwinagain 1 point ago +5 / -4

And no other building has had fully fueled airliners slam into them at full speed before.

Just fire isn't going to be enough, but when you scoop out three or four floors worth of structual supports, THEN set those floors on fire... the weight of the building above is more than the destroyed and weakened metal can support.

If you can't wrap your mind around simple physics you should stop acting like you know what you are talking about.

Because you don't.

also LOL @ 7 having a "small fire"

holy shit you suck at this.

1
honkpillfarmer 1 point ago +2 / -1

Wtc 7 caught on fire how? Which plane hit it?

0
45willwinagain 0 points ago +2 / -2

two giant buildings worth of flaming debris smashed into the ground a few feet from it...

tends to cause problems.

jesus you haven't put an ounce of research into this at all.

you can see dozens and dozens of videos of that day to see the building burning for quite some time before it fell.

but hey don't let facts and evidence get in the way of your masturbatory fantasies about lizard men and UFO's shooting patriot missiles at the twin towers.

1
HockeyMom4Trump 1 point ago +4 / -3

Many experts in physics disagree

6
GreatHumungous 6 points ago +7 / -1

Right I mean modern buildings just collapse at freefall speed due to nothing all the time.

-1
45willwinagain -1 points ago +3 / -4

so destroying multiple floors worth of structure by slamming a plane into them at full speed... including the central core where the stairs and elevators were... that probably won't contribute to a weakening of the supporting structure?

then setting that remaining damaged metal on fire and letting it cook?

thats not gonna cause issues eh?

thefuckoutta here with that trash.

3
Kraken_V_Algorithm 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hadn't heard that. The popular story was that it was headed for the Whitehouse.

2
Sevralann 2 points ago +3 / -1

Holy shit 🤔😳

2
CelesteD 2 points ago +2 / -0

you mean the one that never made it there?

-13
FullAutoFlintlock -13 points ago +1 / -14

Don't worry, she's on Jamal's cock while you are at work.

6
chris82tk 6 points ago +6 / -0

Seek help coomer