that plane was going to go wherever the hell the piece of shit flying it decided it would.
building 7 was so small on the skyline compared to the buildings around the WTC complex it would have been difficult to get in there unless it was essentially straight down into the top of it.
the 4th plane was hijacked last, it got further west than the other 3, by the time they took control it was turned around out over lake erie and started headed back twords DC
thats why, IMO, they took it down.
ANG was in the air at that point, any plane not identifying and immediately landing would have been taken out... and what better place to do it than out over shanksville PA (middle of nowhere) before it could make it back to heavily populated areas.
"let's roll" is probably the only lie about the whole 9/11 story, because people weren't ready to hear that the US military shot down a passenger plane full of US citizens...
they still aren't.
but 7 fell for the same exact reason the other two fell... because slowly heating the metal supports of a damaged area of a building eventually reaches a point where that damaged area can no longer hold the weight of the building above it.
so it fails.
it's why the building that got hit second fell first... because the damage was lower on the tower and therefore it had to hold more weight so it failed faster.
all this dogshit about patriot missiles and windowless planes and whatever the theory is this week... it's all just distractions to make anyone who questions the people who planned it, and let it happen, look crazy.
it's much less complex than the glowies try to make you believe it is.
Shill alert!!! All of 9 11 was a scam. Yes there were crazy stories floated but the truth was fairly easy to find if you ignore all the childish rantings about structural steel suddenly collapsing and notice no other skyscraper has collapsed due to fire. One in Spain burned for 2 fricking days and bent. Also there are no other plane crashes in history with such a small pile of airplane debris. Lots of other evidence if you use your own brain and don't listen to these shills, I mean honestly, a small fire in #7 and it also failed? RIGHT
And no other building has had fully fueled airliners slam into them at full speed before.
Just fire isn't going to be enough, but when you scoop out three or four floors worth of structual supports, THEN set those floors on fire... the weight of the building above is more than the destroyed and weakened metal can support.
If you can't wrap your mind around simple physics you should stop acting like you know what you are talking about.
you don't seem to be picking up what i'm putting down.
Everything you said still fits into the theory that the people who planned it and allowed it to happen love it when internet jackoffs mouth fuck each other with extra chromosome theories about patriot missiles and windowless planes.
It's called controlled opposition.
Nobody will take you seriously if you keep deepthroating nonsense.
The entire corner of the building was scooped out by the collapse of two of the largest buildings in the country right next door.
it then caught fire.
As the fire burned the structural steel looses it's ability to support the weight of the building above it.
Once the weight of the building was more than the slowly failing supporting structure could support, the support failed and the building fell into the damaged area.
It's exactly how/why the other two towers collapsed.
"Just fire isn't going to be enough, but when you scoop out three or four floors worth of structural supports, THEN set those floors on fire... the weight of the building above is more than the destroyed and weakened metal can support."
False. Why are you lying?
WTC 1 & 2 had ALL floors FULLY SUPORTED by the multitude of giant core beams constructed in the middle of the buildings surrounded by the heavily reinforced concrete shaft.
This design was created to ensure that both towers could withstand not one but multiple crashes of airliners. It didn't matter how much of the outer walls was destroyed as they just acted like fly screens on a door or window, which you can poke as many holes you like through but that doesn't effect the rigidity or stability of the actual door/window.
The "official fairy tale" also completely omitted the fact that the fire chief got all the way up to the very floors of the crash and could be heard on the recordings reporting "only small pockets of fires and nothing that one or two ladders wouldn't be able to handle".
So, the fire chief was up there IN PERSON and reported that this was not going to be a big deal. There was NO "inferno" like in the "official fairy tale" which you keep parroting.
The buildings were designed to withstand a crash of a much smaller plane flying slowly lost in the fog looking for the nearby airport (see bomber hits the empire state building)
they WERE NOT DESIGNED to withstand a fully loaded, fully fueled modern airliner flying at full speed into the buildings.
the way the towers were constructed the floors were an open design, and this was accomplished by a strong central core bridged to the outer skin (and hat trusses) vis zig zag trusses that held up pre-tensioned concrete.
the planes demolished the outer skin, multiple floors worth of zigzag trusses (in the impact zones) and the central core (thus taking out the elevators and stairs trapping people above the impact zone).
the impact also blew all the fireproofing insulation off the trusses in the impact zone.
you seem to have a very weak and cherry picked concept of how the buildings were constructed... the fact that you are here insisting that each floor was somehow cantilevered out off into space from the central core is just astonishingly stupid and demonstrates a complete lack of simple engineering understanding.
also sauce please for "the fire chief said it was just a small campfire"
you can clearly see there was thick black smoke billowing from both towers for a LONG time after the impacts... meaning the fuel (which was mostly aerosolized on impact) had long since burned away and you were seeing everything on those impacted floors burning.
chairs, desks, carpet, tons of plastic...
the north tower burned from 8:46 till it failed at 10:28 (1 hour and 42 minutes)
the south tower burned for less time from 9:02 till 9:59 (56 minutes)
notice how the second tower to be hit fell first? yeah thats because it was struck lower on the tower and had more weight to hold so it failed quicker.
sustained fires weakened the damaged areas until the structure couldn't support the weight of the undamaged floors above the impact zone...
when that happened the top part of the tower fell through the damaged area and into the lower part of the towers.
buildings are heavy, the lower portions aren't able to "catch" the upper portions when they fall into them.
it's really not that complicated, and i can't for the life of me understand why you cousin fuckers can't wrap your waterheads around it.
two giant buildings worth of flaming debris smashed into the ground a few feet from it...
tends to cause problems.
jesus you haven't put an ounce of research into this at all.
you can see dozens and dozens of videos of that day to see the building burning for quite some time before it fell.
but hey don't let facts and evidence get in the way of your masturbatory fantasies about lizard men and UFO's shooting patriot missiles at the twin towers.
so destroying multiple floors worth of structure by slamming a plane into them at full speed... including the central core where the stairs and elevators were... that probably won't contribute to a weakening of the supporting structure?
then setting that remaining damaged metal on fire and letting it cook?
Look, I am not a physics person. But I have seen many well-regarded physicists and people familiar with fire and the science behind how buildings burn discuss it.
Personally, I don't think it hurts to ever examine and question the narrative we've been told by MSM. Look at the situation with the election. The MSM is telling us one thing, yet they are ignoring tons of evidence that fraud exists. I don't know what happened for sure on 9/11 in regard to how three buildings collapsed (include WTC Building 7, which was never hit by a plane) or how they came down at the rate of speed they did, which many in physics say defied the laws of physics. I don't have all the answers. But I do have many questions and it is always a good thing to go forward with a curious mind and an open mind in regard to seeking answers. Good luck to you and have a great Sunday.
no it wasn't.
that plane was going to go wherever the hell the piece of shit flying it decided it would.
building 7 was so small on the skyline compared to the buildings around the WTC complex it would have been difficult to get in there unless it was essentially straight down into the top of it.
the 4th plane was hijacked last, it got further west than the other 3, by the time they took control it was turned around out over lake erie and started headed back twords DC
thats why, IMO, they took it down.
ANG was in the air at that point, any plane not identifying and immediately landing would have been taken out... and what better place to do it than out over shanksville PA (middle of nowhere) before it could make it back to heavily populated areas.
"let's roll" is probably the only lie about the whole 9/11 story, because people weren't ready to hear that the US military shot down a passenger plane full of US citizens...
they still aren't.
but 7 fell for the same exact reason the other two fell... because slowly heating the metal supports of a damaged area of a building eventually reaches a point where that damaged area can no longer hold the weight of the building above it.
so it fails.
it's why the building that got hit second fell first... because the damage was lower on the tower and therefore it had to hold more weight so it failed faster.
all this dogshit about patriot missiles and windowless planes and whatever the theory is this week... it's all just distractions to make anyone who questions the people who planned it, and let it happen, look crazy.
it's much less complex than the glowies try to make you believe it is.
Shill alert!!! All of 9 11 was a scam. Yes there were crazy stories floated but the truth was fairly easy to find if you ignore all the childish rantings about structural steel suddenly collapsing and notice no other skyscraper has collapsed due to fire. One in Spain burned for 2 fricking days and bent. Also there are no other plane crashes in history with such a small pile of airplane debris. Lots of other evidence if you use your own brain and don't listen to these shills, I mean honestly, a small fire in #7 and it also failed? RIGHT
And no other building has had fully fueled airliners slam into them at full speed before.
Just fire isn't going to be enough, but when you scoop out three or four floors worth of structual supports, THEN set those floors on fire... the weight of the building above is more than the destroyed and weakened metal can support.
If you can't wrap your mind around simple physics you should stop acting like you know what you are talking about.
Because you don't.
also LOL @ 7 having a "small fire"
holy shit you suck at this.
Building 7 was never hit. Were you alive then?
Bitch I'm almost 50, I watched it all happen while i was loading up guns and ammo headed to the cabin.
Building 7 WAS hit, buy two of the largest buildings in the country collapsing right next to it.
https://911fantasyworld.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/wtc7corner.jpg
See that giant chunk carved out of the corner of building 7? Thats a big "get your fucking facts straight before you open your mouth" just for you.
The DIA destroyed 2.5 TB of data on Able Danger, but that’s OK because it probably wasn’t important. http://web.archive.org/web/20050922032625/http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/print?id=1131137
The SEC destroyed their records on the investigation into the insider trading before the attacks, but that’s OK because destroying the records of the largest investigation in SEC history is just part of routine record keeping. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/06/sec-government-destroyed-documents-regarding-pre-911-put-options.html
NIST has classified the data that they used for their model of WTC7’s collapse, but that’s OK because knowing how they made their model of that collapse would “jeopardize public safety“. http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-12/nist-denies-access-wtc-collapse-data http://cryptome.org/nist070709.pdf
More here: https://www.corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy-theory/
you don't seem to be picking up what i'm putting down.
Everything you said still fits into the theory that the people who planned it and allowed it to happen love it when internet jackoffs mouth fuck each other with extra chromosome theories about patriot missiles and windowless planes.
It's called controlled opposition.
Nobody will take you seriously if you keep deepthroating nonsense.
Oh what happened to building 7 then?
https://911fantasyworld.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/wtc7corner.jpg
The entire corner of the building was scooped out by the collapse of two of the largest buildings in the country right next door.
it then caught fire.
As the fire burned the structural steel looses it's ability to support the weight of the building above it.
Once the weight of the building was more than the slowly failing supporting structure could support, the support failed and the building fell into the damaged area.
It's exactly how/why the other two towers collapsed.
buildings are heavy.
"Just fire isn't going to be enough, but when you scoop out three or four floors worth of structural supports, THEN set those floors on fire... the weight of the building above is more than the destroyed and weakened metal can support."
False. Why are you lying?
WTC 1 & 2 had ALL floors FULLY SUPORTED by the multitude of giant core beams constructed in the middle of the buildings surrounded by the heavily reinforced concrete shaft.
This design was created to ensure that both towers could withstand not one but multiple crashes of airliners. It didn't matter how much of the outer walls was destroyed as they just acted like fly screens on a door or window, which you can poke as many holes you like through but that doesn't effect the rigidity or stability of the actual door/window.
The "official fairy tale" also completely omitted the fact that the fire chief got all the way up to the very floors of the crash and could be heard on the recordings reporting "only small pockets of fires and nothing that one or two ladders wouldn't be able to handle".
So, the fire chief was up there IN PERSON and reported that this was not going to be a big deal. There was NO "inferno" like in the "official fairy tale" which you keep parroting.
jesus christ you're fucking stupid...
The buildings were designed to withstand a crash of a much smaller plane flying slowly lost in the fog looking for the nearby airport (see bomber hits the empire state building)
they WERE NOT DESIGNED to withstand a fully loaded, fully fueled modern airliner flying at full speed into the buildings.
the way the towers were constructed the floors were an open design, and this was accomplished by a strong central core bridged to the outer skin (and hat trusses) vis zig zag trusses that held up pre-tensioned concrete.
the planes demolished the outer skin, multiple floors worth of zigzag trusses (in the impact zones) and the central core (thus taking out the elevators and stairs trapping people above the impact zone).
the impact also blew all the fireproofing insulation off the trusses in the impact zone.
you seem to have a very weak and cherry picked concept of how the buildings were constructed... the fact that you are here insisting that each floor was somehow cantilevered out off into space from the central core is just astonishingly stupid and demonstrates a complete lack of simple engineering understanding.
also sauce please for "the fire chief said it was just a small campfire"
you can clearly see there was thick black smoke billowing from both towers for a LONG time after the impacts... meaning the fuel (which was mostly aerosolized on impact) had long since burned away and you were seeing everything on those impacted floors burning.
chairs, desks, carpet, tons of plastic...
the north tower burned from 8:46 till it failed at 10:28 (1 hour and 42 minutes) the south tower burned for less time from 9:02 till 9:59 (56 minutes)
notice how the second tower to be hit fell first? yeah thats because it was struck lower on the tower and had more weight to hold so it failed quicker.
sustained fires weakened the damaged areas until the structure couldn't support the weight of the undamaged floors above the impact zone...
when that happened the top part of the tower fell through the damaged area and into the lower part of the towers.
buildings are heavy, the lower portions aren't able to "catch" the upper portions when they fall into them.
it's really not that complicated, and i can't for the life of me understand why you cousin fuckers can't wrap your waterheads around it.
Wtc 7 caught on fire how? Which plane hit it?
two giant buildings worth of flaming debris smashed into the ground a few feet from it...
tends to cause problems.
jesus you haven't put an ounce of research into this at all.
you can see dozens and dozens of videos of that day to see the building burning for quite some time before it fell.
but hey don't let facts and evidence get in the way of your masturbatory fantasies about lizard men and UFO's shooting patriot missiles at the twin towers.
Many experts in physics disagree
Right I mean modern buildings just collapse at freefall speed due to nothing all the time.
so destroying multiple floors worth of structure by slamming a plane into them at full speed... including the central core where the stairs and elevators were... that probably won't contribute to a weakening of the supporting structure?
then setting that remaining damaged metal on fire and letting it cook?
thats not gonna cause issues eh?
thefuckoutta here with that trash.
Look, I am not a physics person. But I have seen many well-regarded physicists and people familiar with fire and the science behind how buildings burn discuss it.
Personally, I don't think it hurts to ever examine and question the narrative we've been told by MSM. Look at the situation with the election. The MSM is telling us one thing, yet they are ignoring tons of evidence that fraud exists. I don't know what happened for sure on 9/11 in regard to how three buildings collapsed (include WTC Building 7, which was never hit by a plane) or how they came down at the rate of speed they did, which many in physics say defied the laws of physics. I don't have all the answers. But I do have many questions and it is always a good thing to go forward with a curious mind and an open mind in regard to seeking answers. Good luck to you and have a great Sunday.
many "well regarded" "experts" claim biden won the election.
stack bricks on top of an empty beer can until it's about to crush, then flick the side of the can, the bricks fall at "near freefall speed".
thats what things do when what is holding them up stops holding them up.
Take the L, reddit fag
suck the D conspirtatard.