so destroying multiple floors worth of structure by slamming a plane into them at full speed... including the central core where the stairs and elevators were... that probably won't contribute to a weakening of the supporting structure?
then setting that remaining damaged metal on fire and letting it cook?
Look, I am not a physics person. But I have seen many well-regarded physicists and people familiar with fire and the science behind how buildings burn discuss it.
Personally, I don't think it hurts to ever examine and question the narrative we've been told by MSM. Look at the situation with the election. The MSM is telling us one thing, yet they are ignoring tons of evidence that fraud exists. I don't know what happened for sure on 9/11 in regard to how three buildings collapsed (include WTC Building 7, which was never hit by a plane) or how they came down at the rate of speed they did, which many in physics say defied the laws of physics. I don't have all the answers. But I do have many questions and it is always a good thing to go forward with a curious mind and an open mind in regard to seeking answers. Good luck to you and have a great Sunday.
I’m not an expert, but I’ve seen what happens to the structural integrity of over-heated steel. It gets greatly weakened and breaks or even completely falls apart, and that’s without having to support anything. I’m not sure why something so obvious is still so controversial.
it's absolutely insane these fucking kids continue to regurgitate this dumb shit.
when you heat steel up it looses all of it's structural integrity, there is data sheets readily available to see exactly what kind of steel was used in the buildings and what temps they begin to turn into useless garbage when it comes to carrying the weight of a god-damned skyscraper.
the planes took out a huge portion of the support structure on impact... the damaged and undamaged supports left standing were able to hold the upper floors, but not after you cook them with a fire for that long.
it's just lazy logic... it's easier for them to think/believe that some magical conspiracy shit happened because it's more comfortable than the realization that someone can decide to do this again whenever the fuck they want.
so destroying multiple floors worth of structure by slamming a plane into them at full speed... including the central core where the stairs and elevators were... that probably won't contribute to a weakening of the supporting structure?
then setting that remaining damaged metal on fire and letting it cook?
thats not gonna cause issues eh?
thefuckoutta here with that trash.
Look, I am not a physics person. But I have seen many well-regarded physicists and people familiar with fire and the science behind how buildings burn discuss it.
Personally, I don't think it hurts to ever examine and question the narrative we've been told by MSM. Look at the situation with the election. The MSM is telling us one thing, yet they are ignoring tons of evidence that fraud exists. I don't know what happened for sure on 9/11 in regard to how three buildings collapsed (include WTC Building 7, which was never hit by a plane) or how they came down at the rate of speed they did, which many in physics say defied the laws of physics. I don't have all the answers. But I do have many questions and it is always a good thing to go forward with a curious mind and an open mind in regard to seeking answers. Good luck to you and have a great Sunday.
many "well regarded" "experts" claim biden won the election.
stack bricks on top of an empty beer can until it's about to crush, then flick the side of the can, the bricks fall at "near freefall speed".
thats what things do when what is holding them up stops holding them up.
I’m not an expert, but I’ve seen what happens to the structural integrity of over-heated steel. It gets greatly weakened and breaks or even completely falls apart, and that’s without having to support anything. I’m not sure why something so obvious is still so controversial.
it's absolutely insane these fucking kids continue to regurgitate this dumb shit.
when you heat steel up it looses all of it's structural integrity, there is data sheets readily available to see exactly what kind of steel was used in the buildings and what temps they begin to turn into useless garbage when it comes to carrying the weight of a god-damned skyscraper.
the planes took out a huge portion of the support structure on impact... the damaged and undamaged supports left standing were able to hold the upper floors, but not after you cook them with a fire for that long.
it's just lazy logic... it's easier for them to think/believe that some magical conspiracy shit happened because it's more comfortable than the realization that someone can decide to do this again whenever the fuck they want.
That still does not explain Building 7
sure it does... the exact same principals apply.
both towers collapsed next to 7 and when that happened it took a massive chunk out of the corner of the building and set it on fire
https://911fantasyworld.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/wtc7corner.jpg
damage + heat from fires = slowly weakening damaged area which eventually can no longer hold the weight of the above building.
Take the L, reddit fag
suck the D conspirtatard.