that plane was going to go wherever the hell the piece of shit flying it decided it would.
building 7 was so small on the skyline compared to the buildings around the WTC complex it would have been difficult to get in there unless it was essentially straight down into the top of it.
the 4th plane was hijacked last, it got further west than the other 3, by the time they took control it was turned around out over lake erie and started headed back twords DC
thats why, IMO, they took it down.
ANG was in the air at that point, any plane not identifying and immediately landing would have been taken out... and what better place to do it than out over shanksville PA (middle of nowhere) before it could make it back to heavily populated areas.
"let's roll" is probably the only lie about the whole 9/11 story, because people weren't ready to hear that the US military shot down a passenger plane full of US citizens...
they still aren't.
but 7 fell for the same exact reason the other two fell... because slowly heating the metal supports of a damaged area of a building eventually reaches a point where that damaged area can no longer hold the weight of the building above it.
so it fails.
it's why the building that got hit second fell first... because the damage was lower on the tower and therefore it had to hold more weight so it failed faster.
all this dogshit about patriot missiles and windowless planes and whatever the theory is this week... it's all just distractions to make anyone who questions the people who planned it, and let it happen, look crazy.
it's much less complex than the glowies try to make you believe it is.
Shill alert!!! All of 9 11 was a scam. Yes there were crazy stories floated but the truth was fairly easy to find if you ignore all the childish rantings about structural steel suddenly collapsing and notice no other skyscraper has collapsed due to fire. One in Spain burned for 2 fricking days and bent. Also there are no other plane crashes in history with such a small pile of airplane debris. Lots of other evidence if you use your own brain and don't listen to these shills, I mean honestly, a small fire in #7 and it also failed? RIGHT
And no other building has had fully fueled airliners slam into them at full speed before.
Just fire isn't going to be enough, but when you scoop out three or four floors worth of structual supports, THEN set those floors on fire... the weight of the building above is more than the destroyed and weakened metal can support.
If you can't wrap your mind around simple physics you should stop acting like you know what you are talking about.
no it wasn't.
that plane was going to go wherever the hell the piece of shit flying it decided it would.
building 7 was so small on the skyline compared to the buildings around the WTC complex it would have been difficult to get in there unless it was essentially straight down into the top of it.
the 4th plane was hijacked last, it got further west than the other 3, by the time they took control it was turned around out over lake erie and started headed back twords DC
thats why, IMO, they took it down.
ANG was in the air at that point, any plane not identifying and immediately landing would have been taken out... and what better place to do it than out over shanksville PA (middle of nowhere) before it could make it back to heavily populated areas.
"let's roll" is probably the only lie about the whole 9/11 story, because people weren't ready to hear that the US military shot down a passenger plane full of US citizens...
they still aren't.
but 7 fell for the same exact reason the other two fell... because slowly heating the metal supports of a damaged area of a building eventually reaches a point where that damaged area can no longer hold the weight of the building above it.
so it fails.
it's why the building that got hit second fell first... because the damage was lower on the tower and therefore it had to hold more weight so it failed faster.
all this dogshit about patriot missiles and windowless planes and whatever the theory is this week... it's all just distractions to make anyone who questions the people who planned it, and let it happen, look crazy.
it's much less complex than the glowies try to make you believe it is.
Shill alert!!! All of 9 11 was a scam. Yes there were crazy stories floated but the truth was fairly easy to find if you ignore all the childish rantings about structural steel suddenly collapsing and notice no other skyscraper has collapsed due to fire. One in Spain burned for 2 fricking days and bent. Also there are no other plane crashes in history with such a small pile of airplane debris. Lots of other evidence if you use your own brain and don't listen to these shills, I mean honestly, a small fire in #7 and it also failed? RIGHT
And no other building has had fully fueled airliners slam into them at full speed before.
Just fire isn't going to be enough, but when you scoop out three or four floors worth of structual supports, THEN set those floors on fire... the weight of the building above is more than the destroyed and weakened metal can support.
If you can't wrap your mind around simple physics you should stop acting like you know what you are talking about.
Because you don't.
also LOL @ 7 having a "small fire"
holy shit you suck at this.
The DIA destroyed 2.5 TB of data on Able Danger, but that’s OK because it probably wasn’t important. http://web.archive.org/web/20050922032625/http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/print?id=1131137
The SEC destroyed their records on the investigation into the insider trading before the attacks, but that’s OK because destroying the records of the largest investigation in SEC history is just part of routine record keeping. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/06/sec-government-destroyed-documents-regarding-pre-911-put-options.html
NIST has classified the data that they used for their model of WTC7’s collapse, but that’s OK because knowing how they made their model of that collapse would “jeopardize public safety“. http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-12/nist-denies-access-wtc-collapse-data http://cryptome.org/nist070709.pdf
More here: https://www.corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy-theory/