4061
Comments (237)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
45willwinagain -1 points ago +3 / -4

so destroying multiple floors worth of structure by slamming a plane into them at full speed... including the central core where the stairs and elevators were... that probably won't contribute to a weakening of the supporting structure?

then setting that remaining damaged metal on fire and letting it cook?

thats not gonna cause issues eh?

thefuckoutta here with that trash.

6
HockeyMom4Trump 6 points ago +6 / -0

Look, I am not a physics person. But I have seen many well-regarded physicists and people familiar with fire and the science behind how buildings burn discuss it.

Personally, I don't think it hurts to ever examine and question the narrative we've been told by MSM. Look at the situation with the election. The MSM is telling us one thing, yet they are ignoring tons of evidence that fraud exists. I don't know what happened for sure on 9/11 in regard to how three buildings collapsed (include WTC Building 7, which was never hit by a plane) or how they came down at the rate of speed they did, which many in physics say defied the laws of physics. I don't have all the answers. But I do have many questions and it is always a good thing to go forward with a curious mind and an open mind in regard to seeking answers. Good luck to you and have a great Sunday.

-3
45willwinagain -3 points ago +4 / -7

many "well regarded" "experts" claim biden won the election.

stack bricks on top of an empty beer can until it's about to crush, then flick the side of the can, the bricks fall at "near freefall speed".

thats what things do when what is holding them up stops holding them up.

3
BecMonTchew 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m not an expert, but I’ve seen what happens to the structural integrity of over-heated steel. It gets greatly weakened and breaks or even completely falls apart, and that’s without having to support anything. I’m not sure why something so obvious is still so controversial.