113
Comments (57)
sorted by:
21
arthur_morgan 21 points ago +25 / -4

Women in the workforce = downfall of America.

You used to have 1 salary to feed the family. When women entered the workforce en masse, men's wages stagnated and now you have to have 2 salaries to fucking survive.

12
sometimescanbefunny 12 points ago +13 / -1

“Can’t afford to quit your job, stay home with your new child, and homeschool it so it stays away from the insanity and depravity that is a public school? Thank a feminist!”

5
RedFoxOnFire 5 points ago +5 / -0

Labor is a commodity, businesses pay for your time.

Like any commodity, its price is based off of supply vs demand.

When women went to work, suddenly the market was filled with a surplus of laborers, the demand went down hence the price of labor went down.

2
BoughtByBloomberg2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Elizabeth Warren actually wrote a book about this. Back in the ancient times when she was trying to grift the Union workers into voting for her instead of the Blue Hairs.

0
TwistedSister 0 points ago +2 / -2

And yet it's Marjorie Green who has bigger balls than all the "men" in Congress. We need more women and less "men."

11
PelosiSux1776 11 points ago +11 / -0

I also think it was a lie that most women wanted to work out of the home. I think the media just promoted up a few loud mouth feminists like Gloria Steinmen.

6
TheTelltaleFly 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is a fact. It is really really hard to be away from your baby when they are very young. It’s hard on the baby too. This whole feminism thing is a bunch of bullshit.

1
PelosiSux1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah I was just thinking of that dumb movie Mona Lisa’s Smile. If a young woman wanted to just start a family, she’d get accused of wanting an “Mrs” degree back in the day. Like what is so wrong with wanting a family?

3
muddobber 3 points ago +3 / -0

I thought this commie bitch died.

3
0095D 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is a lie. The content women upload to youtube et al is proof of that. If we exclude the "gamer girls" and other women who are obviously making content to profit off their looks and body (not judging, because that's natural for women), the vast majority of what women upload is related to cooking, cosmetics, fashion, health, the arts, and children.

You know... shit they would be getting into if they weren't at work.

9
wwwchae 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's better to stop uninformed idiots from voting then it is to stop an entire sex from doing so.

-2
Ivleeeg -2 points ago +3 / -5

Incorrect, take a look at the political opinions of men vs women.

9
wwwchae 9 points ago +9 / -0

I've taken a look at the political opinions of both and come to the conclusion they both can say very fucking dumb things.

0
Ivleeeg 0 points ago +1 / -1

They sure can. But that's not what I'm saying at all. Men as a whole vote for a government. Women as a whole vote for a father.

0
wwwchae 0 points ago +1 / -1

Except it is part of American identity to judge based on individual not as a general outline.

0
Ivleeeg 0 points ago +1 / -1

Is that why women weren't allowed to vote for the first 130 years of our country?

1
wwwchae 1 point ago +1 / -0

Responding with a question like that is quite idiotic... observe!

Is that why we had slavery for the first century of our country?

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Predictable. The premise of the OP is questioning exactly that. Slavery is evil because it denies the basic humanity of people. Giving women the right to vote has no moral equivalency to slavery. Women didn't even want the right to vote during the suffrage movement because they didn't want the other responsibilities that came with active participation in government.

Its a pointless argument as it's a theoretical argument anyway. No one is going to take women's right to vote away.

8
VaPnut 8 points ago +9 / -1

That, and reducing the voting age from 21 to 18. Don't give me the silly argument about they draft 18 year olds so they should vote because we no longer use the draft and 18 year olds are too immature to even wipe their own ass (unless they enlist into the service where they are finally taught how to take care of themselves)

2
SliceOFriedGold 2 points ago +3 / -1

Half the boots are looking for surrogate daddy until they mature anyway... or they want to play Rambo cause they can't decide what to do with their own lives. Deciding what is best for the country? Sure, let em vote.

7
strictly1957 7 points ago +14 / -7

A man of critical thinking distinction I see...

I post similar here regularly. It all started going wonky from Suffrage on down. We simply can't have emotional children voting. Not now. Not ever!!!

16
sometimescanbefunny 16 points ago +16 / -0

we also need to go back in time and tie voting to being productive (land-owner, net tax positive, whatever other measure is effective). It shouldn’t be universal. A lot of people don’t really care, they just want their gibs. Even a political test or something would be nice. Poll tax of like 10 bucks so people can decide if their vote matters more than a fast food combo meal? I don’t know. I just know that if we could stop the retards, we’d be in an infinitely better situation.

7
strictly1957 7 points ago +7 / -0

I spilt fresh Covfefe grinning over those last two sentences man!!! Hmmmm Tendies or a Vote? lemme think... decisions decisions eh.

Btw this thread should be the lead in Shit Post Sunday! aka "Take A Dump On The NFL Sunday"

3
muddobber 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree completely.

2
muddobber 2 points ago +3 / -1

Time to back up and correct all the shit we created.

5
Ophelia 5 points ago +8 / -3

Most women judge and vote based on looks. Change my mind.

4
strictly1957 4 points ago +5 / -1

I couldn't and ditto my own view on the disaster their votes have wrought!

5
Itiswrittenkjv1611 [S] 5 points ago +7 / -2

Amen

6
BasedBurckhardt 6 points ago +7 / -1

Female political leadership is also a problem because they live perpetually under the expectation that they will be protected and are incapable of truly understanding the ultimate consequences of poor decision making.

You can't have people (men) who are expected to die if the situation requires it being led by those who don't expect to ever have to lay down their lives.

3
Itiswrittenkjv1611 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Right

2
Heywood_youblowme 2 points ago +2 / -0

Something that doesn't get mentioned enough, but is the most important aspect imho.

Great post.

4
SliceOFriedGold 4 points ago +6 / -2

Well you're not wrong... id say get women out of politics too, but there are only like 2 maga in congress right nkw, and 2 are women

-1
Itiswrittenkjv1611 [S] -1 points ago +1 / -2

Had me in agreement right up until the end. So close

5
SliceOFriedGold 5 points ago +6 / -1

Who else is vociferously maga in congress right now other than gaetz, boebert, and greene?

4
Ivleeeg 4 points ago +5 / -1

The business of government is the business of men. The protection of the country, the enforcement of the law, etc are all work dominated by men (for physical reasons). Women vote for the government do women things (be caring and kind, take care of people, etc) and combining those things with the monopoly of force the government has, is a very bad idea.

If women want to vote they need to volunteer to be in the military at the same rate as men. They need to become cops at the same rate as men. They need to become lawyers at the same rate as men. But women aren't drawn to those career fields because they are fields of conflict.

Obviously this doesn't apply to all women, just a generalization that is borne out in the stats.

2
Global_Tornado 2 points ago +4 / -2

No, it started with the fall of the berlin wall when we let all the people raised by communists invade the west.

Or before that when we let the nazis escape to south america

or before that when...

2
2Bad4U 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, the 60s were. We decided to become of bunch of pussies from that point on. Men should have stepped up and said enough is enough. But, men buckled under the pressure because we didn't want to be looked at as not compassionate. It did the opposite, men became pussies and empowered women to walk all over them. I always point back to the 80s also when men were told to be a "sensitive 80s man". It was fucking pathetic that men cut off their balls to be "sensitive". Now, if you stand up for men, you are called a "male chauvinist pig." On a side note, you watch most popular action movies and who is usually the hero? Could it be the bad ass man?

1
JEARS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmmm who or what could be behind that? Not hard to figure out if you engage the ole noggin, you might even figure out not just who is behind it but why.

2
Saltyslug69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Spare the rod and spoil the child.

1
JEARS 1 point ago +1 / -0

This information isnt hard to obtain, unless of course ignorance suits your "argument" better.

55% of white women voted for Trump, an increase of 2% from 2016, 59% of white men voted for Trump, a decrease of 4% from 2016.

18% of black men voted for Trump 8% of black women voted for Trump Other " minorities " didn't do better than 35% for Trump. Good thing he pandered to them nonstop. Maybe the 4% of white males who dumped him in 2020 got sick of hearing about minority unemployment and the platinum plan.

Trumps support amongst white men fell 4% from 2016 which was enough to flip the vote to Biden. From 63% to 59% . Yes, according to the RNC white males were the only demographic where Trump lost support.

Reality check: Trump won in a landslide, but if you want to place " blame " for 2020 I'd start with 1) massive fraud which Trump wouldn't or couldn't prove. 2) loss of 4% of the white male vote ( explain to me why better than 4 out of ten white males would vote for a party that endlessly demonizes them? Woman you could at least argue have something to gain by voting Democratic, but wth caused butt hurt white males to even consider voting Democrat? This is troubling) and 3) very marginal gains in the black vote despite Trumps endless pandering to them. Did anyone in the RNC consider that a more aggressive campaign to bring in the much bigger more flexible Hispanic vote was the better play? What's wrong with the smooth brains at the RNC?

So why aren't we discussing the real problem, ( anyone else smell chicken?) Given that 35% of whites vote democratic because they like high taxes and genocide, and minorities are good for 66% of the democratic vote time to face reality, we aint winning another national election. Trump more than likely garnered 80 million votes running against a corpse, who in the Hell is gonna top that? Rubio, Haley, Cruz or Romney? Haha good one guys. Ya know damn well the RNC will run a pussy RINO in 2024 in loose in spectacular fashion. People by and large want socialism, I don't know how with unlimited resources and spheres of influence behind them the globslists lose. We would have to uncuck half the population.

1
Tenspot20 1 point ago +2 / -1

You can make babies and you don't even have to really try. No degree will lessen or advance this important contribution. Do the work that your body asks of you.

Know your place and know your enemy.

1
StartAgain 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yeah i'm not afraid to admit that I dislike most women

1
tilkibazil 1 point ago +3 / -2

big tech & big corpo & big media & big government cooperation is not because of woman.

you invaded Iraq because your masters in Pentagon told Bush to do it, not because of woman.

1
Old_Timer 1 point ago +2 / -1

Who do you think took care of the American family while patriots were off fighting wars? Only idiots choose not to educate and take advantage of the minds of half their population, and we call them shitholes. Stop being such a blatant misogynist because smart women want nothing to do with you. Get help.

1
Itiswrittenkjv1611 [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

OoOoH a MiSoGyNiSt!! Guess I'm in good company with Trump eh Old_timer? Probably just another guy who's cucked by marriage. Anyway.. sounds like the men were taking care of the family by saving it and going to war. Even if the women took care of the home which is their job, doesn't mean they should vote! Duh! That's like apples to oranges.

-1
MySidesGoUp -1 points ago +4 / -5

Women’s rights, then Black’s right, then Gay’s rights.

Rights given by rights taken away.

2
muddobber 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then the rights of dog freaks to marry their dogs.

1
MySidesGoUp 1 point ago +1 / -0

For the posse of women- voting is fine, workplace improvement etc. . I’m talking about the Right to Murder.

Once we let wahmen decide who lives and dies- we opened the door for all the chicanery. We’ve decriminalized crime and created this inverse society where amorality is rewarded over responsibility.

Over 80% elective or ‘convenience’ abortions- we’re all paying for it now.

✌️

-2
Johnson998 -2 points ago +2 / -4

Even before that, men stopped hitting women.

-4
afro54 -4 points ago +2 / -6

You have dementia - change my mind!

But, seriously - you make a good, but twisted point.

5
Itiswrittenkjv1611 [S] 5 points ago +8 / -3

The face of sjws is women. They go on their emotions not logic or reason.

3
afro54 3 points ago +5 / -2

There is a biblical basis to your argument but, I'm recalling that:

When voting was linked to land ownership, it was restricted to white males.

2
SliceOFriedGold 2 points ago +2 / -0

You could link to land ownership today, and the dems would just find a way to take your land away if they don't like your politics. No land no vote!