Predictable. The premise of the OP is questioning exactly that. Slavery is evil because it denies the basic humanity of people. Giving women the right to vote has no moral equivalency to slavery. Women didn't even want the right to vote during the suffrage movement because they didn't want the other responsibilities that came with active participation in government.
Its a pointless argument as it's a theoretical argument anyway. No one is going to take women's right to vote away.
Also you may have misunderstood why I referred to slavery, it was addressing how simply because founders didn't properly address it or put it in constitution doesn't mean it isn't an important issue that should have been addressed. Like the 3/5 clause postponed the issue of slavery.
Also the question you previously responded with didn't address topic of individuality it merely detracted.
Except it is part of American identity to judge based on individual not as a general outline.
Is that why women weren't allowed to vote for the first 130 years of our country?
Responding with a question like that is quite idiotic... observe!
Is that why we had slavery for the first century of our country?
Predictable. The premise of the OP is questioning exactly that. Slavery is evil because it denies the basic humanity of people. Giving women the right to vote has no moral equivalency to slavery. Women didn't even want the right to vote during the suffrage movement because they didn't want the other responsibilities that came with active participation in government.
Its a pointless argument as it's a theoretical argument anyway. No one is going to take women's right to vote away.
Right about it being pointless argument.
Although I would agree if you want the right to vote you need to have all the responsibilities that come with it.
Also you may have misunderstood why I referred to slavery, it was addressing how simply because founders didn't properly address it or put it in constitution doesn't mean it isn't an important issue that should have been addressed. Like the 3/5 clause postponed the issue of slavery.
Also the question you previously responded with didn't address topic of individuality it merely detracted.