They won't let him discuss the election. They'll just silence him with the gavel. They'll say he's only allowed to mention his fake incitement to violence.
The election fraud is material to the 'incitement'. It's what drove the 'incitement' so it's permissible as you have to establish a train of logic and what brought about the end result.
They won't let him discuss the election. They'll just silence him with the gavel. They'll say he's only allowed to mention his fake incitement to violence.
The election fraud is material to the 'incitement'. It's what drove the 'incitement' so it's permissible as you have to establish a train of logic and what brought about the end result.