3344
Comments (95)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
49
Leatherwood 49 points ago +49 / -0

THERE SHOULD BE A WAY TO PROSECUTE THE SICK FUCK FOR CONTRIBUTING TO THE REMOVAL OF A LIFE SAVING MEDICATION FROM SICK PEOPLE IN NEED.

19
MikesBigJockstrap 19 points ago +19 / -0

There is a way to prosecute him, we just gotta borrow a tool from Bubba Wallace's garage.

12
goldkeyboardwarrior 12 points ago +14 / -2

Nothing will happen. The primary reason to block the information was to discredit Trump and increase the chances of him losing his reelection bid. Since they were successful, the primary beneficiary of their treachery (Joe Biden) will not sic his DOJ against them in any form.

8
GlobalPatriotism 8 points ago +8 / -0

I wouldn't say that so quickly. All it would take is for some pissed off patriots to get together and file a class action lawsuit with a hungry law firm for wrongful death.

Facebook was in effect was falsely acting as a medical provider, which led to killing people by actively preventing and suppressing them from hearing of what would have saved them. There are many wrongful death lawsuits that are based on a doctor just alone forgetting or even not knowing of a treatment; facebook etc, were not only actively suppressing information, they were impersonating medical qualifications and authority to give make medical advice.

I have not directly lost anyone, but if I had, I would be shopping around major attorney's right now. You will need to find someone specialized in medical practice, is large enough, and also does not represent the tech companies due to conflict of interest. It will likely take a while to find the right firm, but it could mean hundreds of millions individually once punitive damages are added, or triple digit billions or even trillions for a class action.

It could also be brought by a laser eyes attorney general of, e.g., South Dakota. It could quite literally even be taken so far as to shut down Facebook, even though the pressure against that would be immense. A wild eyed state AG could do it though for at least their state if not push for national shutdown of Facebook like they would move against any other organization providing fraudulent medical services.

1
goldkeyboardwarrior 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope you’re right. Not for my sake, since the information wouldn’t have helped anybody I know (the only person I know that died of COVID was in her late 80s and already had other health issues), but for the sake of others that were denied this information for political reasons.

I don’t know how Zuckerberg can look in the mirror knowing that he may have contributed to the deaths of thousands for the sole purpose of helping getting Biden elected, but then again I have doubts Zuck even shows up in a mirror the way he is.

1
GlobalPatriotism 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am quite certain that he would not see anything in a mirror. I think anti-Christian beady eyed, money grabbler demons don't have reflections.

6
Sl0re10 6 points ago +6 / -0

Actually... there is. Any relative of someone who died should sue them.

It is the weakest link of the chain. They didn't just allow content that got someone hurt. They censored helpful information and replaced with bad info. Publisher. No way that can be defended as the action of a platform.