1805
Comments (61)
sorted by:
44
FightingTeuton 44 points ago +44 / -0

Good timeline but forgot one really important part. The campaign against hcq from that woman who fed her and her husband fish tablets and he died, the press made hcq into the most dangerous thing and Trump caused it all, might as well have dosed them both because orange man bad. Remember that, was horrible how they treated the President.

20
MustBeTrump 20 points ago +20 / -0

TRUMP TOLD US ALL TO DRINK FISH CLEANER AND WE ARE ALL CLEAN FISH NOW.

3
anon2309011 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did she get away with the perfect murder?

3
Keiichi81 3 points ago +3 / -0

The woman who pretended to be a Trump supporter who "heard what her president said and trusted him" who then turned out to be a deranged Democrat with Stage 5 TDS and anti-Trump stuff all over her social media.

The woman who fucking deliberately murdered her husband just so she could have an Orange Man Bad story for the media.

What ever happened with her? As I recall, she was being investigated, and then it all just disappeared.

2
Jleinf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep the Lincoln project ran with that fake bs and normies sucked it up

26
Sildaran 26 points ago +26 / -0

You forgot the study from 2005 of HCQs effective against SARs proven in lab. Since Covid and Sars are 70% same rna strand and both use ace2 receptors for infection. HCQ was not just randomly picked for study it already had a very solid lab proven capability to also be effective against covid.

They always knew HCQ would stop this BS.

12
Bonami 12 points ago +12 / -0

And Fauci knew of that research, said at the time that it proved that HCQ was ideal for SARs.

7
QuantumBogosity 7 points ago +7 / -0

Guns are effective against viruses in vitro; lots of things are. In vitro doesn't tell you as much as you think it does. What it tells you is that if the medication could get to the right place, in the right concentration in the right amount of time to still be relevant, with doses that aren't dangerous and none of the other tens of thousands of substances in the body inhibits the effect, it might be effective.

There is no substitute for testing these things in vivo, and most medicines tested in vivo fail even if they showed some effect in vitro.

With COVID-19 in particular it is known that there is a viral replication phase and an inflammationary phase. Giving HCQ 14 days after infection, when vulnerable people start to get put in respirators is entirely meaningless. There is no virus left; there is only dead virus particles and an overactive immune system going scorched earth. That's when they give steroids to weaken the immune systems hyperinflammatory response; which would be bad if there still was a lot of live virus. Giving HCQ early in the onset, before you end up in a hospital; when you do not yet know if you're going to be severely affected; is what could have a large effect on reducing viral growt. That requires you to proactively give HCQ. Most studies in vivo focused on giving very excessive doses (far larger than is used as profylaxis against malaria) and usually without zinc and azithromycin; and they gave those doses to people who had little or no virus left.

What that's going to do is give you a mess of studies that show different things, because they are actually testing different doses in different stages of the disease combined with different things (some give zinc, some don't).

4
Sildaran 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep I spent a decent amount of time browsing around in pubmed and lancet looking for HCQ related research also. The point of it being already known to be effective to some degree in early stages of a SARs infection. Combined with SARs and Covid being the same family of virus with same cell attachment method. Means that HCQ was not just some accidental drug to test. They had a fairly good idea it would be effective. I think a time-line should reflect this. The medical community already knew they had a potential treatment for early stage infection.

5
snoopy3210 5 points ago +5 / -0

He also forgot that the VA study (May 19) was not claiming it was ineffective, it claimed that it KILLS people.

Governors BANNED HCQ after that corrupt study. The french doctor analysed it, said they took people that died of Covid, selected some that had received HCQ very late and falsly claimed that is the reason of death.

Headlines went ballistic and Neil Cavuto believed the headlines.

1
Surfsup [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't see a specific reference it kills (by the VA). Only included what was specifically written or said

1
Sildaran 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ya. I think that study said it was ineffective not that it actually caused complications. Still sick as heck. HCQ was shown to be useful in early stages not the advanced late stages of a bad infection, and all the tests where on veterans either on oxygen about to be ventilated or already ventilated. Instead of testing the steroids that COULD be effective in severe cases and maybe save lives. They tested HCQ which showed no signs of being useful in the late stages...

These demons had to have known of the HCQ studies before this. So they intentionally let veterans die then used that BS study. To convince people HCQ was bad... killing more people.

And every day these people who KNEW the research and KNEW there actions would get people killed, committed actual murder... the MSM praises them, and at least 30% of this country faps themselves daily waiting for their MSM masters to tell them what to think......

1
snoopy3210 1 point ago +1 / -0

The VA study. Paid by NIH. Analyzed on his podcast by the great Dr Didier Raoult.
I didn't read it, but this man knows what he's talking about. The study falsely claims that HCQ killed people at the VA. In comparison it said that taking nothing was better. It was complete fabrication. And it generated all the headlines at the time.

14
Beer-_-Belly 14 points ago +14 / -0

Don't forget the HCQ plant in India that burned down.

10
Bonami 10 points ago +10 / -0

And the family that was the largest producer of HCQ in Canada were murdered.

2
jimmajamma 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is this it? This was Taiwan:

https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4082989

14
GreatestAmericanHero 14 points ago +14 / -0

You missed the May 24th "I gave my husband fishbowl cleaner because of Trump and he died" that all the Twatter bots spammed.

2
Darkheartisland 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't let idiots stay in the history books.

2
GreatestAmericanHero 2 points ago +2 / -0

This 'case' was used to say ORANGE MAN KILLED SOMEONE. Meanwhile, democrat governors were begging for ventilators and doctors were intubating everyone to death so their hospitals would make more money.

12
Mrsattorney 12 points ago +12 / -0

You could add Dem state representative Karen Whitsett crediting HCQ with saving her life. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.freep.com/amp/2955430001 I would also add Neil Cavuto who went nuts on air saying HCQ could kill you. He mocked the President who had said "What have you got to lose?" Cavuto replied, "YOU COULD LOSE YOUR LIFE!" And there's an African American nursing home Dr who treated all of his patients with HCQ and reported excellent results. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wfaa.com/amp/article/news/health/coronavirus/texas-elderly-hydroxychloroquine-coronavirus-treatment-texas-city/287-7383185c-940c-4cb2-82ea-c4a5ffad3ffb And put Fauci on here...he publicly stated he wouldn't recommend taking HCQ.

2
thallos 2 points ago +2 / -0

It would be sweet to get this timeline as article headline screenshots with dates

8
AsaNisiMAGA 8 points ago +8 / -0

Needs an "oh yeah and btw..." with Fauxi's old paper showing the efficacy of HCQ for SARS and related corona virus diseases. The prophylactic and the cure, he said himself IIRC.

6
3
Surfsup [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Simply type what I wrote into a search engine it will all come up. I didn't want to cloud the timeline with extra text

6
mixednuts86 6 points ago +6 / -0

For those of us rational people who watched this unfold, it makes a complete picture. For the NPCs, "Oops we made a mistake." Is a justified response to anything that happened in the beginning... "We learned so much in this year!"

Infuriating to no end. HCQ could have stopped this thing dead. No mail in ballots, no destroyed economy. All a part of the plan.

1
Surfsup [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your last sentence

5
mugatucrazypills 5 points ago +5 / -0

you should add fauci's own paper from a dozen years back recomending HCQ adjunct therapies as a first line against this class of infection.

1
Surfsup [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not part of the timeline. It's just a timeline of main events

2
Southern_Belle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Important to the timeline:

In January 2020, France removed HCQ from the safe list.

Here's the timeline: On January 13, Agnes Buzyn, still France's Health Minister, classifies chloroquine as a "poisonous substance," from now on only available by prescription. An astonishing move, considering that it has been sold off the shelf in France for half a century. https://www.opednews.com/articles/Why-France-is-hiding-a-che-by-Pepe-Escobar-Chloroquine_France_Frances-Fox-Piven_Tsunami-200328-903.html

They were in on the scam from the beginning.

https://www.politico.eu/article/france-bans-use-of-hydroxychloroquine-to-cure-coronavirus/

Edit to correct date.

1
FirosAhoge 1 point ago +1 / -0

This kinda blew up on my facebook and a lib commented "theRe r No ciTations". I basically told her you can look it up if you want, it looks about right to me just using my memory. Not gonna waste my time linking articles she can clearly google herself, when she's just gonna ignore anything I say anyway. If you have a separate file with the links that could help. Since you already did all the work I thought it was pointless for me to do so, especially with someone with severe TDS. Anyway, thanks for the timeline. They need to come face to face with their double standards and hypocrisy

5
LesboPregnancyScare 5 points ago +5 / -0

you forgot the trials, tests, and proven data from 50 fucking years ago at the top of this timeline.

3
Surfsup [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's was more about trump coming out with hcq as a possibility and the media organizing the anti hcq message. Not a history of hcq but feel free

2
LesboPregnancyScare 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its maddening that there were supposedly new data to be had on an already proven safe drug that has been used for 50 years. All because of severe TDS. Those people allowed citizens to die because of their TDS.

4
turdinthepunch 4 points ago +4 / -0

Democrats and their media machine are sinister and depraved.

1
Surfsup [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
FreedomYeah 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, henry ford study showed it was effective. Prior to that Governor Whitmer sent a letter from the licensing director threatening against use of it, but apparently retracted it. https://www.metrotimes.com/news-hits/archives/2020/03/31/gov-whitmer-reverses-course-on-coronavirus-drugs-is-now-asking-feds-for-hydroxychloroquine-and-chloroquine

2
WeAreGonnaWin 2 points ago +2 / -0

HCQ is safe for even pregnant women, fish cleaner not so much.

2
TheSinkingMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does anyone have saved footage of media blasting HCQ? I know it's they did it since I frequently saw it live but I'm putting a presentation together and it'd be nice if there was an archive. I could even browse through an entire day's worth of broadcasts just for footage. I just need to know where that footage is.

1
FAQ-REDDIT 1 point ago +1 / -0

And recently, two hcq production plant cought on fire. So when this penny cure starts making it to market and cost is skyrocketed... Well we know why... It because of darn fires... Supply is low you know. What a fucking scam.

1
system76 1 point ago +1 / -0

Great List. If I may:

Jan 20 - Biden Inaugurated

Jan 28 - HMH releases study that shows HCQ effective

Would be even more telling

1
thallos 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is amazing, we need to push on this.

Maybe add a line for when Amy Klobuchar said on the radio that her husband received HCQ treatment.

1
Bonami 1 point ago +1 / -0

If there were still schools of journalism this horrific medical deception would be a for credit course all on its own.

But there are no more schools that teach objective journalism, for if they did, they would be target and closed.

Dark times people, dark times.

1
SteelDriver 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ingsoc can not allow anything other than Trump criticism. If Trump cured cancer, the cure would be dismissed as dangerous or fraudulent.

1
UsernameKeksOut 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fauci the director of NAIAD got it wrong about HCQ. I’m assuming the biggest miss of NAIAD history. Why does he still hold the position. Also why can’t we ask that question in a public forum without being blocked/attacked?

1
meanwhileinamerica 1 point ago +1 / -0

The left has lied, cheated, stole and killed.

1
mainrift 1 point ago +1 / -0

Friend of mine had it, I had ordered some a few months back thru frontline, wanted to help, "helped her", using frontline protocol. Day 1 102 fever, day 3 working out in home gym. Just saying.

1
ImpeachTheWitchHunt 1 point ago +1 / -0

hmmmm

1
A-Blinkin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here is all the scientific evidence that HCQ works against Covid19: https://c19study.com.

In the Lancet study that claimed it was dangerous they gave patients an overdose of HCQ and gave it to them too late.

1
Hershey 1 point ago +1 / -0

I posted an article on Facebook last year February or March about Hydroxychloroquine. It was removed. First time, I was censored.

1
pink_virtuoso 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can we get links to all these dates? That would make this perfect.

1
BiteMeMarxist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Left out where Lancet removes its article.

2
Surfsup [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's there June 4

1
BiteMeMarxist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Damn Evelyn Wood!

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1