37
posted ago by Singingthebattlecry ago by Singingthebattlecry +37 / -0

Are the global elites trying to get us used to the idea of living in extremely small spaces and without books?

I am open to the idea of tiny homes except there's no room for the written word.

Comments (15)
sorted by:
7
fegeline 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's part of the urbanization plan. Think of it this way, anyone living in a rural area likely has a whole shed of timber, propane tanks, oil tanks and the ability to heat their home (and food) using store able fuel. Anyone living in a bigger city needs electricity from the centralized grid.

If you live in a rural place you likely has a truck and some machines running on pure dinosaur, these machinery also has a generator which allows you to generate electricity, even if the government decides you're a domestic terrorist and shuts you off the grid.

If you live in a rural place you probably have some guns for self defense as well as for hunting. If you live in a city you probably don't understand why anyone need guns.

If you live in a rural place you may have additional buildings on your property with the sole purpose to store shit that might be useful some day, if you live in a small apartment you have no place to store useful shit and depends fully on the government and the big box companies to have everything you need in stock.

1
havemydata 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unless you really need to sleep with your propane and oil tanks, build a shed.

1
Liberty4All 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are some exceptions, but most of these tiny houses are on tiny urban lots - there's no place to build a shed.

1
havemydata 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree that Urban living isn't ideal if you want to keep a collection of 55 gallon waste oil drums and a few cords of wood, but it seems like that isn't a problem with the home but the property.

It actually seems like tiny homes are the solution to space restrictions. I've seen plenty of suburban areas with houses almost as large as the properties they sit on. A tiny home would leave you more space for all the non functioning cars your heart desires.

1
Liberty4All 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wasn't talking about keeping a junkyard. Just having space for tools to fix problems as they occur.

I have seen tiny homes on tiny lots most of the time. I've also seen tiny homes stuck into corners of other people's lots or on city property (for the homeless or as cheap rentals). I have also seen a few people buy big tracts of land in the wilderness and build a tiny home off-grid, usually so they can live with a small eco-footprint.

What I'm not seeing is people building tiny homes on lots sized for standard homes in urban or suburban areas. Most urban and suburban areas have building codes, HOAs, and/or deed restrictions on residential lots that effectively prevent tiny homes. They want to "preserve the character of the neighborhood", which really means keep up property values.

Tiny homes on standard lots with a shed on back is an idea that appeals to very few people, so they don't keep up property values in a neighborhood.

6
FlyinHeadlock 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's retarded. It's actually more expensive to live that way than owning a real home long term. Those tiny homes will not appreciate like a modest home. It's just a dumb fad. It takes a special kind of freak to live in that with a family. They will not be invited to by backyard pool/hot tub party and grill kitchen that's for fucking sure. Freaks.

2
SCP0073 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s a fad, for sure. Haven’t met a conservative yet that thinks tiny homes are “cool.” I do work with a worthless lib who wants one, tho.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Proud_American 3 points ago +3 / -0

They banned those things in more places than they allow them. Have a friend who built one and was forced out of it. He lives in his van, now. Somehow that was a better solution according to the state of Colorado.

2
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here's a video from Paul Joseph Watson about it from 2019.

https://youtu.be/baNt9GuwjfE

2
RPchill1 2 points ago +2 / -0

On the west coast they are trying to incentivize homeowners to allow tiny homes on their properties to house homeless. They're definitely trying to normalize us into redistribution of property wealth. Won't be long before they start showing up at our doors to introduce us to our assigned squatters. Hell, we've got one in the White House already! 🤡 🌎

2
Liberty4All 2 points ago +2 / -0

There also isn't room for food storage and real cooking. Or tools to fix your own cars, appliances, and stuff.

Tiny houses on tiny lots are just another tool to make people more dependent on others and the government.

1
Latinalover 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only for the fully indoctrinated. Who would want to live in a house where the toilet lid doubles as the kitchen table? Or where the living room furniture doubles as the bedroom furniture. Utter nonsense.

1
FlyinHeadlock 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like how they try to make them nice with wood floors, nice hardware, sheik cabinets and windows. It's not that they do not like nice, rich looking things. They love those things but can't afford the real thing or just plain fucking lazy to put in the time and effort to earn it the real deal.

It took me half a lifetime to earn the real thing. All hard work, no handouts, lots of sacrifices. Tiny home? Try living in a crackhead neighborhood, paying for college yourself and working a couple jobs. Yeah, none of these fuckers are going to do that.

1
MoldyLocksNesMonste 1 point ago +3 / -2

Yes. They want people in small houses so there is no room for books.

Said no one ever.