Are the global elites trying to get us used to the idea of living in extremely small spaces and without books?
I am open to the idea of tiny homes except there's no room for the written word.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Are the global elites trying to get us used to the idea of living in extremely small spaces and without books?
I am open to the idea of tiny homes except there's no room for the written word.
There are some exceptions, but most of these tiny houses are on tiny urban lots - there's no place to build a shed.
I agree that Urban living isn't ideal if you want to keep a collection of 55 gallon waste oil drums and a few cords of wood, but it seems like that isn't a problem with the home but the property.
It actually seems like tiny homes are the solution to space restrictions. I've seen plenty of suburban areas with houses almost as large as the properties they sit on. A tiny home would leave you more space for all the non functioning cars your heart desires.
I wasn't talking about keeping a junkyard. Just having space for tools to fix problems as they occur.
I have seen tiny homes on tiny lots most of the time. I've also seen tiny homes stuck into corners of other people's lots or on city property (for the homeless or as cheap rentals). I have also seen a few people buy big tracts of land in the wilderness and build a tiny home off-grid, usually so they can live with a small eco-footprint.
What I'm not seeing is people building tiny homes on lots sized for standard homes in urban or suburban areas. Most urban and suburban areas have building codes, HOAs, and/or deed restrictions on residential lots that effectively prevent tiny homes. They want to "preserve the character of the neighborhood", which really means keep up property values.
Tiny homes on standard lots with a shed on back is an idea that appeals to very few people, so they don't keep up property values in a neighborhood.