3761
Comments (316)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
42
DrinkLikeAGilmore 42 points ago +45 / -3

Eh, they were never getting my money anyway. Too many of these companies make massive amounts of money on conditioning girls and women that they need makeup (which the companies conduct horrific animal testing and use toxic chemicals) to look beautiful.

15
DrinkLikeAGilmore 15 points ago +17 / -2

And after looking at many of her YouTube video thumbnails...something seems off..... a LOT of skin exposure for starters.. Think this is manufactured drama.

22
sfmaga 22 points ago +22 / -0

Took a look at her channel as well, quickly came across a 13 year old boy doing his and her makeup, ending up in drag.

Ah yes, a true conservative.

8
deplorabetty [S] 8 points ago +10 / -2

She's a beauty influencer. Of course she's going to show some skin. Does that make it okay for her to be shunned because of her politics?

19
DrinkLikeAGilmore 19 points ago +19 / -0

I didn't say she deserved to be shunned. But also dont get the whole exposing half of yourself, especially to influential young teens (some shots in lingerie) for money. Sort her vids from oldest to newest and you can clearly see the transformation of where YT fame & pressure came in. More heavy makeup, more skin, video with trans teen...so many YTers follow same pattern.

6
MAGAgirl76 6 points ago +6 / -0

I used to watch Amanda’s videos when she lived in TN before she moved out to LA several years ago. She was different then, more wholesome. She also was in some drama a few years ago when another youtuber accused her of “stealing” a t-shirt design. I didn’t keep up with how it played out. Even though I don’t doubt Sephora would drop Amanda for being a Trump supporter (knowing how woke these companies are getting) I am also way to familiar with the antics of these beauty youtubers over the last decade.

7
stratocaster_patriot 7 points ago +8 / -1

The patriarchy is always blamed for the high pressure bullshit women and gays place upon women. It's them who demand what women should look like and convince them what they need to do. These days you not only have those types trying to get them to look like models (gag) but the activist women are trying to get them to follow the path of being dangerously fat whales. Meanwhile us guys are like, whatevs, and we take all the blame.

2
Persevero 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly we do our most careful makeup when going out with the girls.

Anyone over 16 knows to keep it simple with makeup.

1
stratocaster_patriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not far from the truth for me back in the 80's lol. Thing is I never wanted special treatment for being a different sort of hetero (it was a phase anyway) and was fully aware that people were going to fuck with me but it was my choice. If I didn't want to get flipped shit I could just stop doing what I was doing because I was not born that way. It was a choice I was making to get girls. But still I and the people I knew that were gay (I am not) never identified with the mentally ill trannies. We didn't mess with them but we didn't think it was normal human nature either.

Anyone over 16 knows to keep it simple with makeup.

Haha but they don't apparently if they are tranny. Then apparently makeup "makes the woman" and they plaster it on like Gertrude the Clown.

0
lefty295 0 points ago +2 / -2

Well the thing is, making women look like fat whales would help them, cause said fat whales would then need makeup to look decent. They're simply terrified of the idea that people become self sustaining in any way, even when it comes to a woman and makeup.

1
plaaaa 1 point ago +1 / -0

So she kept compromising & it wasnever good enough 4 the woke?