45
Comments (34)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
13
Langtath 13 points ago +14 / -1

You think a different lawyer would have changed anything? The judges could have had John Quincy Adams and Johnny Cochran before them and it would have been the same outcome.

8
JEARS 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well maybe Rudy could have encouraged Trump to follow through with Flynn's plan to seize the voting machines , ballots and election materials in the 6-8 problematic counties and do a manual recount on line for all to see. That would have solved it one way or another. I do think we are owed an explanation why this didn't happen. In absence of that we have PB's story of what happened. Maybe Rudy put too much faith in his ability to persuade the state legislators to do the right thing. PB said Rudy was making $100k a week, so maybe he wanted it to drag out and not do the recount with the National Guard which PB said could be done in a week or so. For what its worth Flynn retweeted this story and told everyone to read it so it doesn't seem like he is disputing it.

8
Proud_American 8 points ago +8 / -0

This. Nobody would have gotten the upper hand. Courts never even looked at the evidence.