This is why, as I've been saying, the federal government is not going to do anything about media censorship: it dovetails precisely with what the feds want without them having to play the bad guy. They can claim that they're not suppressing freedom of speech, and as long as it's a private company that's doing it, the government's hands are tied. (wink, wink)
Conversely this allows Suckerborg to say (paraphrasing, but he says this in the video) "we shouldn't be deciding how to apply censorship, we need the government to give us a democratically approved set of rules".
This is why, as I've been saying, the federal government is not going to do anything about media censorship: it dovetails precisely with what the feds want without them having to play the bad guy. They can claim that they're not suppressing freedom of speech, and as long as it's a private company that's doing it, the government's hands are tied. (wink, wink)
Conversely this allows Suckerborg to say (paraphrasing, but he says this in the video) "we shouldn't be deciding how to apply censorship, we need the government to give us a democratically approved set of rules".