3651
Comments (111)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
10
loric4882 10 points ago +10 / -0

How hard is it for you to duckduckgo 'dogs detect cancer'

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-3
MSG1000 -3 points ago +1 / -4

The guy’s being rude, but it is true it’s not on him to prove a point for the other side.

3
IcyHue 3 points ago +3 / -0

That doesn't apply here. Your own ignorance and laziness don't entitle you to get facts of common knowledge presented to you on a silver plate whenever you demand them.

1
MSG1000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dogs detecting cancer is not common knowledge. It does apply.

1
IcyHue 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, I think it is. At least to know there are several studies claiming it.

Things like that are just a quick search away (e.g. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/04/190408114304.htm) which I usually prefer to showing a possibly embarrassing knowledge gap.

1
anonymousdonor 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, it's up to him to prove we're wrong.

1
MSG1000 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, people asserting the fact that dogs can detect cancer are making the assertion, not anyone else. The burden of proof is on them.

1
anonymousdonor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dogs and rats smelling whatever on people is a well known, publicly understood fact. It is on him to disprove this.