3651 Just lost my job coal mining. Now I am training rats to reclaim abandoned land mines. Thanks Kumala. (media.patriots.win) 💩 SHITPOST 💩 posted 73 days ago by 308win 73 days ago by 308win +3654 / -3 111 comments share 111 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (111) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 10 ▼ – loric4882 10 points 73 days ago +10 / -0 How hard is it for you to duckduckgo 'dogs detect cancer' permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 73 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ -3 ▼ – MSG1000 -3 points 73 days ago +1 / -4 The guy’s being rude, but it is true it’s not on him to prove a point for the other side. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – IcyHue 3 points 73 days ago +3 / -0 That doesn't apply here. Your own ignorance and laziness don't entitle you to get facts of common knowledge presented to you on a silver plate whenever you demand them. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – MSG1000 1 point 73 days ago +1 / -0 Dogs detecting cancer is not common knowledge. It does apply. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – IcyHue 1 point 73 days ago +1 / -0 Well, I think it is. At least to know there are several studies claiming it. Things like that are just a quick search away (e.g. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/04/190408114304.htm) which I usually prefer to showing a possibly embarrassing knowledge gap. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – anonymousdonor 1 point 73 days ago +1 / -0 No, it's up to him to prove we're wrong. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – MSG1000 1 point 73 days ago +1 / -0 No, people asserting the fact that dogs can detect cancer are making the assertion, not anyone else. The burden of proof is on them. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – anonymousdonor 1 point 73 days ago +1 / -0 Dogs and rats smelling whatever on people is a well known, publicly understood fact. It is on him to disprove this. permalink parent save report block reply
How hard is it for you to duckduckgo 'dogs detect cancer'
The guy’s being rude, but it is true it’s not on him to prove a point for the other side.
That doesn't apply here. Your own ignorance and laziness don't entitle you to get facts of common knowledge presented to you on a silver plate whenever you demand them.
Dogs detecting cancer is not common knowledge. It does apply.
Well, I think it is. At least to know there are several studies claiming it.
Things like that are just a quick search away (e.g. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/04/190408114304.htm) which I usually prefer to showing a possibly embarrassing knowledge gap.
No, it's up to him to prove we're wrong.
No, people asserting the fact that dogs can detect cancer are making the assertion, not anyone else. The burden of proof is on them.
Dogs and rats smelling whatever on people is a well known, publicly understood fact. It is on him to disprove this.