The assertion isn’t just plain sickness, which your statement would qualify for many mammals, but specifically cancer. Other assertions are that animal X can even tell where it’s at on the body. Those require sources.
If you weren’t making the initial claims then I apologize. It’s easy to confuse responses at times. I stand by my assertions regarding those who were though.
No, people asserting the fact that dogs can detect cancer are making the assertion, not anyone else. The burden of proof is on them.
Dogs and rats smelling whatever on people is a well known, publicly understood fact. It is on him to disprove this.
The assertion isn’t just plain sickness, which your statement would qualify for many mammals, but specifically cancer. Other assertions are that animal X can even tell where it’s at on the body. Those require sources.
I don't have a statement. I haven't made any.
If you weren’t making the initial claims then I apologize. It’s easy to confuse responses at times. I stand by my assertions regarding those who were though.