Didn’t this man offer to argue Trumps cases in front of the Supreme Court? I would assume that he would have been intimately aware of the evidence for Fraud as well as the unconstitutional rule changes made in select swing states. What’s his angle here now and how exactly does he think making such remarks will help him politically?
Didn’t this man offer to argue Trumps cases in front of the Supreme Court? I would assume that he would have been intimately aware of the evidence for Fraud as well as the unconstitutional rule changes made in select swing states. What’s his angle here now and how exactly does he think making such remarks will help him politically?