861
Comments (57)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
32
Filo76 32 points ago +32 / -0

Hard to prove your case when no court will hear it. There is a mountain of evidence yet not a single judge or court had the brass to hear it. It’s still unbelievable to me.

5
Maga0351 5 points ago +6 / -1

Cruz tried to argue the election fraud case before the Supreme Court, and they wouldn’t hear it. Now he’s saying that proves there wasn’t enough fraud. For being a Harvard grad senator who has worked on election cases before, he seems to suck horribly at election law.

4
Johnfox13 4 points ago +4 / -0

Like wtf, didn’t he object?

1
BasedTemplar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes a whopping one time! So brave! Much stun!