He's always been a RINO, I've tried telling people that for a year now. These career politicians don't change. They do just enough to get re-elected and then return to the swamp for another six years. Nice catch phrases and strong words on twitter are hardly a sign that someone has become '2.0'.
I really hope you all realize the entire GOP are cowards and traitors. They were never our friends. Get this idea of primarying them out of your heads. We need to start a whole new party. It's not going to be easy, and it may take some time, but it needs to be done. I am never voting for a republican again.
I think this was a shot at Rudy, and Jen (who's a book genius but a trial lawyer??). "The campaign didn't prove"
in other words the cases were prepared so weakly by Rudy that they couldn't get to evidence and merit.
Of course a lot of the judges gave zero fucks (esp. SC) in wanting to go forward. I think with a better legal team we may have gotten further along although I've read there are still open cases.
Trump's legal team fucked him over and over and over and over and over.
If Trump runs again, and I'm allowed to ask him one question, it would be "Did you learn the lessons from 2016 to 2020, and have you hand-picked better staff that IS loyal and reliable."
Senator Ted Cruz: “President Trump’s rhetoric, I think, went way too far over the line. I think it was both reckless and irresponsible because he said repeatedly—and he said over and over again—he won by a landslide; there was massive fraud; it was all stolen everywhere. That evidence, the campaign did not prove that in any court, and to make a determination about an election it has to be based on the evidence, and so simply saying the result you want, that’s not responsible and you’ve never heard me use language like that. What I’ve said is voter fraud is real, and we need to examine the evidence, and look at the actual facts; and in particular, what is the evidence of how much voter fraud occurred, and did it occur in sufficient quantities and in sufficient states to alter the outcome of the election. That would have been the mandate of the election commission; to assess.”
And later around the 25-minute mark, he refers to the events of January 6th, 2021 as “a terrorist attack on the United States Capital.”
I watched the video, it's taken out of context. Ted is strongly in support of an investigation, and acknowledges massive numbers of people think the election was fradulent. He says a few things I don't agree with here or there (I'm not a puritan) but he was strongly in favor of a real investigation and acknowledges it didn't happen and that massive numbers of people believe the election was stolen.
I'd like him to be more MAGA, sure, but it's not at all like the headline claims.
The article is misleading. Ted Cruz is strongly in favor of an election investigation. He's not full-on MAGA in the sense of saying the election was stolen with millions of fraudulent votes, and takes a slightly more cautious stance, but he spends a lot of time talking in favor of a real investigation.
I thought the Knowles/Cruz team-up for the Verdict podcast last year was a great play. What happened to the "Lion Ted" who spoke so strongly and forcefully against the media narrative back then? He's turned into a housecat!
I can only hope Cruz doesn't take Knowles with him down this path of "squishing out" (to use a Knowles phrase) - but the way Knowles carefully toes the line with "suggestions" of how the election really went, rather than name the evil outright, makes me think someone got to him too...
Watch the video. Ted Cruz absolutely supports and investigation. He's not coming full out MAGA and saying "100% the election was stolen by millions of votes" but rather that we absolutely need an investigation into the election, and he was one of our strongest supporters throughout the whole process.
Sure, I wish we had even stronger supporters, but he absolutely in no way is backstabbing everyone who thinks there was massive election fraud.
Is this real or DF? Why does side profile photo of him on chair not look 100% like him...something off about face, chin & cheek area...can't pinpoint it exactly
He's always been a RINO, I've tried telling people that for a year now. These career politicians don't change. They do just enough to get re-elected and then return to the swamp for another six years. Nice catch phrases and strong words on twitter are hardly a sign that someone has become '2.0'.
To be fair, Lyin Lion is correct about the court part, because the courts literally refused to actually see the literal mountains of evidence.
I really hope you all realize the entire GOP are cowards and traitors. They were never our friends. Get this idea of primarying them out of your heads. We need to start a whole new party. It's not going to be easy, and it may take some time, but it needs to be done. I am never voting for a republican again.
I think this was a shot at Rudy, and Jen (who's a book genius but a trial lawyer??). "The campaign didn't prove" in other words the cases were prepared so weakly by Rudy that they couldn't get to evidence and merit. Of course a lot of the judges gave zero fucks (esp. SC) in wanting to go forward. I think with a better legal team we may have gotten further along although I've read there are still open cases.
Trump's legal team fucked him over and over and over and over and over.
If Trump runs again, and I'm allowed to ask him one question, it would be "Did you learn the lessons from 2016 to 2020, and have you hand-picked better staff that IS loyal and reliable."
He's running again. Lying Ted Cruz.
Give it 48 hours to see if it's the truth. Always wait before passing judgement. Gateway is not always truthful.
Senator Ted Cruz: “President Trump’s rhetoric, I think, went way too far over the line. I think it was both reckless and irresponsible because he said repeatedly—and he said over and over again—he won by a landslide; there was massive fraud; it was all stolen everywhere. That evidence, the campaign did not prove that in any court, and to make a determination about an election it has to be based on the evidence, and so simply saying the result you want, that’s not responsible and you’ve never heard me use language like that. What I’ve said is voter fraud is real, and we need to examine the evidence, and look at the actual facts; and in particular, what is the evidence of how much voter fraud occurred, and did it occur in sufficient quantities and in sufficient states to alter the outcome of the election. That would have been the mandate of the election commission; to assess.”
And later around the 25-minute mark, he refers to the events of January 6th, 2021 as “a terrorist attack on the United States Capital.”
To be fair, he picked his words wisely and said he didn't prove it in front of court.
Gateway Pundit is right 99% of the time. So is National File and Infowars. Way too many cucks on T_D trying to discredit sources that are based.
I watched the video, it's taken out of context. Ted is strongly in support of an investigation, and acknowledges massive numbers of people think the election was fradulent. He says a few things I don't agree with here or there (I'm not a puritan) but he was strongly in favor of a real investigation and acknowledges it didn't happen and that massive numbers of people believe the election was stolen.
I'd like him to be more MAGA, sure, but it's not at all like the headline claims.
Damn. That’s just sad. Really liked him.
The article is misleading. Ted Cruz is strongly in favor of an election investigation. He's not full-on MAGA in the sense of saying the election was stolen with millions of fraudulent votes, and takes a slightly more cautious stance, but he spends a lot of time talking in favor of a real investigation.
He has no idea where he stands on anything.
yup ted cruz is now a rino i honestly saw this coming. liberal hivemind even said ted cruz is all talk no action
I thought the Knowles/Cruz team-up for the Verdict podcast last year was a great play. What happened to the "Lion Ted" who spoke so strongly and forcefully against the media narrative back then? He's turned into a housecat!
I can only hope Cruz doesn't take Knowles with him down this path of "squishing out" (to use a Knowles phrase) - but the way Knowles carefully toes the line with "suggestions" of how the election really went, rather than name the evil outright, makes me think someone got to him too...
Told ya.
Watch the video. Ted Cruz absolutely supports and investigation. He's not coming full out MAGA and saying "100% the election was stolen by millions of votes" but rather that we absolutely need an investigation into the election, and he was one of our strongest supporters throughout the whole process.
Sure, I wish we had even stronger supporters, but he absolutely in no way is backstabbing everyone who thinks there was massive election fraud.
Is this real or DF? Why does side profile photo of him on chair not look 100% like him...something off about face, chin & cheek area...can't pinpoint it exactly