2528
posted ago by TrumpWinz ago by TrumpWinz +2529 / -1

I am student of history and am always interested in learning about ancient civilizations. Why is it that with all this black history month stuff that I am be bombarded with across MSM and social media, I don't see anything about ancient sub Saharan African civilizations? It seems that black history only started in the last 500 years and all I hear about are activists from the last 100 years. The Egyptians, Hittites, Minoans, Mesopotamians all had empires dating back to 3300 BC. We can see their archaeological remains with buildings, tools, pottery, tablets, skeletons, references to each other within ancient texts. Why don't the black history month people showcase the achievements of ancient Sub Saharan African civilizations?


EDIT For some reason about 20% of you seem to think that I am saying that the Egyptians, Hittites, and Minoans were sub Saharan African civilizations. That would be a complete misread of my post. I am using them as an example of the fact that there are a lot of archaeological remains of other civilizations from 3300 years ago that can be studied. So if that is the case, then there should be some level of material that can be studied for ancient Sub Saharan African civilizations.

In the greater interest of truly understanding Black History it would only make sense to get the full timeline of the African Diaspora and see their plight in full historical context.

Comments (454)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
31
buckiemohawk 31 points ago +32 / -1

Right there on the spot. A lady was telling me how racist I was this summer and i responded had she ever traveled the world. And the answer is no. Once you do and have been to even Thailand were there is a popular saying "Thailand is for Thais." and your are called Farang. You will understand just a little bit better

33
ParadigmShift2070 33 points ago +33 / -0

Asialand for asians, blackland for blacks, beanland for beaners, smallhatland for small Hatians.

Not so fast huwites, huwiteland is for erybody

4
everyman 4 points ago +11 / -7

Outside of some Persians, Aztecs and Ghaghis Khan westerners conquered a lot of places most likely because we figured out the cannon and rifle first and our kings were dicks.

It could have easily been Asians or African that hit an enlightenment first if not because of their tribalism.

Probably western agriculture gave Europe an edge because people could be stationary and build fortifications.

3
Rfmaga 3 points ago +5 / -2

Book "Guns Germs and Steel" Jared Diamond