He says in the video that it was not proven in court which is the same leftist talking point. All of Trumps lawsuits were dismissed on technicalities including the ones filed by independent voters. The court simply refused to look at the merit, spare me with that bs.
Yes, I know what he said. But soon after that statement, he goes on to say the reason for that is because we've never been ALLOWED to present the evidence in court. He's literally in the middle of a 15+ minute segment arguing there was fraud, and we need a real investigation, a real court-case, and we haven't gotten it.
Can you please watch the video? Cruz is literally arguing for MAGA and for Trump in 95% of the video. I'm not interested in debate, you can literally just watch the video. Watch at least 1-2 minutes.
Soon after he goes into how (1) there was fraud (2) there was no investigation and (3) there was no opportunity to present evidence, and (4) we need that investigation and legit court case.
Literally just watch the video, he makes that exact point you're asserting he's avoiding.
He says in the video that it was not proven in court which is the same leftist talking point. All of Trumps lawsuits were dismissed on technicalities including the ones filed by independent voters. The court simply refused to look at the merit, spare me with that bs.
Did you watch at least 1-2 minutes of the video?
Yes, I know what he said. But soon after that statement, he goes on to say the reason for that is because we've never been ALLOWED to present the evidence in court. He's literally in the middle of a 15+ minute segment arguing there was fraud, and we need a real investigation, a real court-case, and we haven't gotten it.
Can you please watch the video? Cruz is literally arguing for MAGA and for Trump in 95% of the video. I'm not interested in debate, you can literally just watch the video. Watch at least 1-2 minutes.
https://youtu.be/p6ReEeokXQI?t=1054
WATCH THE VIDEO, at least 1-2 minutes.
https://youtu.be/p6ReEeokXQI?t=1054
Soon after he goes into how (1) there was fraud (2) there was no investigation and (3) there was no opportunity to present evidence, and (4) we need that investigation and legit court case.
Literally just watch the video, he makes that exact point you're asserting he's avoiding.