Because the official data all the media used for the election shows vote decrements and vote leveling. Once is a mistake, dozens of times is malfeasance. The only way to figure out if the data matches the actual ballots is a forensic audit. Instead of allowing one, local politicians are actively blocking them which makes them look even more guilty. Even the audits that were allowed were simply "counting counterfeit money twice".
I think people are just arguing past each other. Some people are arguing very specific data and questions that need answering, others argue in the abstract. Yes, he could have done a better job, but I think the people around him weren't serving him well and the time to get it right worked against him. Now that the facts about the fraud are starting to trickle out, people are arguing that the clock has already ran out, though that's probably irrelevant.
Because the official data all the media used for the election shows vote decrements and vote leveling. Once is a mistake, dozens of times is malfeasance. The only way to figure out if the data matches the actual ballots is a forensic audit. Instead of allowing one, local politicians are actively blocking them which makes them look even more guilty. Even the audits that were allowed were simply "counting counterfeit money twice".
All clear?
https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/arizona/president.json
I think people are just arguing past each other. Some people are arguing very specific data and questions that need answering, others argue in the abstract. Yes, he could have done a better job, but I think the people around him weren't serving him well and the time to get it right worked against him. Now that the facts about the fraud are starting to trickle out, people are arguing that the clock has already ran out, though that's probably irrelevant.