2086
Comments (220)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-17
deleted -17 points ago +1 / -18
8
Liberty49220 8 points ago +8 / -0

I don't need to do my own study. Your own study found that masks "worn" by naive (i.e. not-infected) hamsters did not significantly reduce the COVID-19 transmission rate: "The use of surgical mask partition to protect naive hamsters reduced the transmission rate to 33.3%, although this did not reach statistical significance." To the best of my knowledge, no study has found that mask wearing (other than N-95 or equivalent) by healthy persons has a significant effect.

-15
Fignugent -15 points ago +1 / -16

To the best of my knowledge

you're not a doctor. "to the best of your knowledge" means absolutely nothing

8
Liberty49220 8 points ago +8 / -0

Actually I'm an engineer who understands statistics. The only randomized study that I'm aware of tracked over 3000 people and concluded that wearing a mask reduced transmission by 0.3% (basically zero). The number allowed the researchers to conclude at 95% confidence interval that the "real" effect of a mask is between -1.2% to +0.4%. In other words, in the best mask study published (that I'm aware of) the authors concluded with 95% confidence that masks have basically zero effect on transmission, positive or negative. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817

I'll ask again: Regardless of your credentials, do you know of any study showing a statistically significant reduction in covid transmission by healthy people wearing a mask?